Cargando…

Treatment planning system commissioning of the first clinical biology‐guided radiotherapy machine

PURPOSE: The RefleXion X1 is a novel radiotherapy machine designed for image‐guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and biology‐guided radiotherapy (BgRT). Its treatment planning system (TPS) generates IMRT and SBRT plans for a 6MV‐FFF beam delivered axially via 50 firing positions with the couch advancing ever...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simiele, Eric, Capaldi, Dante, Breitkreutz, Dylan, Han, Bin, Yeung, Timothy, White, John, Zaks, Daniel, Owens, Michael, Maganti, Srinath, Xing, Lei, Surucu, Murat, Kovalchuk, Nataliya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9359035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35644039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13638
_version_ 1784764054563192832
author Simiele, Eric
Capaldi, Dante
Breitkreutz, Dylan
Han, Bin
Yeung, Timothy
White, John
Zaks, Daniel
Owens, Michael
Maganti, Srinath
Xing, Lei
Surucu, Murat
Kovalchuk, Nataliya
author_facet Simiele, Eric
Capaldi, Dante
Breitkreutz, Dylan
Han, Bin
Yeung, Timothy
White, John
Zaks, Daniel
Owens, Michael
Maganti, Srinath
Xing, Lei
Surucu, Murat
Kovalchuk, Nataliya
author_sort Simiele, Eric
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The RefleXion X1 is a novel radiotherapy machine designed for image‐guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and biology‐guided radiotherapy (BgRT). Its treatment planning system (TPS) generates IMRT and SBRT plans for a 6MV‐FFF beam delivered axially via 50 firing positions with the couch advancing every 2.1 mm. The purpose of this work is to report the TPS commissioning results for the first clinical installation of RefleXion™ X1. METHODS: CT images of multiple phantoms were imported into the RefleXion TPS to evaluate the accuracy of data transfer, anatomical modeling, plan evaluation, and dose calculation. Comparisons were made between the X1, Eclipse™, and MIM™. Dosimetric parameters for open static fields were evaluated in water and heterogeneous slab phantoms. Representative clinical IMRT and SBRT cases were planned and verified with ion chamber, film, and ArcCHECK(@) measurements. The agreement between TPS and measurements for various clinical plans was evaluated using Gamma analysis with a criterion of 3%/2 mm for ArcCHECK(@) and film. End‐to‐end (E2E) testing was performed using anthropomorphic head and lung phantoms. RESULTS: The average difference between the TPS‐reported and known HU values was −1.4 ± 6.0 HU. For static fields, the agreements between the TPS‐calculated and measured PDD(10), crossline profiles, and inline profiles (FWHM) were within 1.5%, 1.3%, and 0.5 mm, respectively. Measured output factors agreed with the TPS within 1.3%. Measured and calculated dose for static fields in heterogeneous phantoms agreed within 2.5%. The ArcCHECK(@) mean absolute Gamma passing rate was 96.4% ± 3.4% for TG 119 and TG 244 plans and 97.8% ± 3.6% for the 21 clinical plans. E2E film analysis showed 0.8 mm total targeting error for isocentric and 1.1 mm for off‐axis treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The TPS commissioning results of the RefleXion X1 TPS were within the tolerances specified by AAPM TG 53, MPPG 5.a, TG 119, and TG 148. A subset of the commissioning tests has been identified as baseline data for an ongoing QA program.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9359035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93590352022-08-10 Treatment planning system commissioning of the first clinical biology‐guided radiotherapy machine Simiele, Eric Capaldi, Dante Breitkreutz, Dylan Han, Bin Yeung, Timothy White, John Zaks, Daniel Owens, Michael Maganti, Srinath Xing, Lei Surucu, Murat Kovalchuk, Nataliya J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: The RefleXion X1 is a novel radiotherapy machine designed for image‐guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and biology‐guided radiotherapy (BgRT). Its treatment planning system (TPS) generates IMRT and SBRT plans for a 6MV‐FFF beam delivered axially via 50 firing positions with the couch advancing every 2.1 mm. The purpose of this work is to report the TPS commissioning results for the first clinical installation of RefleXion™ X1. METHODS: CT images of multiple phantoms were imported into the RefleXion TPS to evaluate the accuracy of data transfer, anatomical modeling, plan evaluation, and dose calculation. Comparisons were made between the X1, Eclipse™, and MIM™. Dosimetric parameters for open static fields were evaluated in water and heterogeneous slab phantoms. Representative clinical IMRT and SBRT cases were planned and verified with ion chamber, film, and ArcCHECK(@) measurements. The agreement between TPS and measurements for various clinical plans was evaluated using Gamma analysis with a criterion of 3%/2 mm for ArcCHECK(@) and film. End‐to‐end (E2E) testing was performed using anthropomorphic head and lung phantoms. RESULTS: The average difference between the TPS‐reported and known HU values was −1.4 ± 6.0 HU. For static fields, the agreements between the TPS‐calculated and measured PDD(10), crossline profiles, and inline profiles (FWHM) were within 1.5%, 1.3%, and 0.5 mm, respectively. Measured output factors agreed with the TPS within 1.3%. Measured and calculated dose for static fields in heterogeneous phantoms agreed within 2.5%. The ArcCHECK(@) mean absolute Gamma passing rate was 96.4% ± 3.4% for TG 119 and TG 244 plans and 97.8% ± 3.6% for the 21 clinical plans. E2E film analysis showed 0.8 mm total targeting error for isocentric and 1.1 mm for off‐axis treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The TPS commissioning results of the RefleXion X1 TPS were within the tolerances specified by AAPM TG 53, MPPG 5.a, TG 119, and TG 148. A subset of the commissioning tests has been identified as baseline data for an ongoing QA program. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9359035/ /pubmed/35644039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13638 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Simiele, Eric
Capaldi, Dante
Breitkreutz, Dylan
Han, Bin
Yeung, Timothy
White, John
Zaks, Daniel
Owens, Michael
Maganti, Srinath
Xing, Lei
Surucu, Murat
Kovalchuk, Nataliya
Treatment planning system commissioning of the first clinical biology‐guided radiotherapy machine
title Treatment planning system commissioning of the first clinical biology‐guided radiotherapy machine
title_full Treatment planning system commissioning of the first clinical biology‐guided radiotherapy machine
title_fullStr Treatment planning system commissioning of the first clinical biology‐guided radiotherapy machine
title_full_unstemmed Treatment planning system commissioning of the first clinical biology‐guided radiotherapy machine
title_short Treatment planning system commissioning of the first clinical biology‐guided radiotherapy machine
title_sort treatment planning system commissioning of the first clinical biology‐guided radiotherapy machine
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9359035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35644039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13638
work_keys_str_mv AT simieleeric treatmentplanningsystemcommissioningofthefirstclinicalbiologyguidedradiotherapymachine
AT capaldidante treatmentplanningsystemcommissioningofthefirstclinicalbiologyguidedradiotherapymachine
AT breitkreutzdylan treatmentplanningsystemcommissioningofthefirstclinicalbiologyguidedradiotherapymachine
AT hanbin treatmentplanningsystemcommissioningofthefirstclinicalbiologyguidedradiotherapymachine
AT yeungtimothy treatmentplanningsystemcommissioningofthefirstclinicalbiologyguidedradiotherapymachine
AT whitejohn treatmentplanningsystemcommissioningofthefirstclinicalbiologyguidedradiotherapymachine
AT zaksdaniel treatmentplanningsystemcommissioningofthefirstclinicalbiologyguidedradiotherapymachine
AT owensmichael treatmentplanningsystemcommissioningofthefirstclinicalbiologyguidedradiotherapymachine
AT magantisrinath treatmentplanningsystemcommissioningofthefirstclinicalbiologyguidedradiotherapymachine
AT xinglei treatmentplanningsystemcommissioningofthefirstclinicalbiologyguidedradiotherapymachine
AT surucumurat treatmentplanningsystemcommissioningofthefirstclinicalbiologyguidedradiotherapymachine
AT kovalchuknataliya treatmentplanningsystemcommissioningofthefirstclinicalbiologyguidedradiotherapymachine