Cargando…
Evaluation of the dosimetric and radiobiological parameters in four radiotherapy regimens for synchronous bilateral breast cancer
This study is to investigate the optimal treatment option for synchronous bilateral breast cancer (SBBC) by comparing dosimetric and radiobiological parameters of intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans using single and dual isocenters. Twenty patien...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9359036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35727562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13706 |
_version_ | 1784764054807511040 |
---|---|
author | Kang, Sang‐Won Kang, Seonghee Lee, Boram Song, Changhoon Eom, Keun‐Yong Jang, Bum‐Sup Kim, In Ah Kim, Jae‐Sung Cho, Woong Shin, Dong‐Suk Kim, Jin‐Young Chung, Jin‐Beom |
author_facet | Kang, Sang‐Won Kang, Seonghee Lee, Boram Song, Changhoon Eom, Keun‐Yong Jang, Bum‐Sup Kim, In Ah Kim, Jae‐Sung Cho, Woong Shin, Dong‐Suk Kim, Jin‐Young Chung, Jin‐Beom |
author_sort | Kang, Sang‐Won |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study is to investigate the optimal treatment option for synchronous bilateral breast cancer (SBBC) by comparing dosimetric and radiobiological parameters of intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans using single and dual isocenters. Twenty patients with SBBC without lymph node involvement were selected retrospectively. Four treatment plans were generated for each patient using the Eclipse treatment planning system (Varian Medical System, Palo Alto, CA, USA) following two delivery techniques with two isocenter conditions—IMRT using a single isocenter (IMRT_Iso1), VMAT using a single isocenter (VMAT_Iso1), IMRT using dual isocenters (IMRT_Iso2), and VMAT using dual isocenters (VMAT_Iso2). A dose of 42.56 Gy in 16 fractions was prescribed for the planning target volume (PTV). All plans were calculated using the Acuros XB algorithm and a photon optimizer for a 6‐MV beam of a Vital Beam linear accelerator. PTV‐related dosimetric parameters were analyzed. Further, the homogeneity index, conformity index, and conformation number were computed to evaluate plan quality. Dosimetric parameters were also measured for the organs at risk (OARs). In addition, the equivalent uniform dose corresponding to an equivalent dose related to a reference of 2 Gy per fraction, the tumor control probability, and the normal tissue complication probability were calculated based on the dose–volume histogram to investigate the radiobiological impact on PTV and OARs. IMRT_Iso1 exhibited similar target coverage and a certain degree of dosimetric improvement in OAR sparing compared to the other techniques. It also exhibited some radiobiological improvement, albeit insignificant. Although IMRT_Iso1 significantly increased monitor unit compared to VMAT_Iso1, which is the best option in terms of delivery efficiency, there was only a 22% increase in delivery time. Therefore, in conclusion, IMRT_Iso1, the complete treatment of which can be completed using a single setup, is the most effective method for treating SBBC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9359036 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93590362022-08-10 Evaluation of the dosimetric and radiobiological parameters in four radiotherapy regimens for synchronous bilateral breast cancer Kang, Sang‐Won Kang, Seonghee Lee, Boram Song, Changhoon Eom, Keun‐Yong Jang, Bum‐Sup Kim, In Ah Kim, Jae‐Sung Cho, Woong Shin, Dong‐Suk Kim, Jin‐Young Chung, Jin‐Beom J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics This study is to investigate the optimal treatment option for synchronous bilateral breast cancer (SBBC) by comparing dosimetric and radiobiological parameters of intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans using single and dual isocenters. Twenty patients with SBBC without lymph node involvement were selected retrospectively. Four treatment plans were generated for each patient using the Eclipse treatment planning system (Varian Medical System, Palo Alto, CA, USA) following two delivery techniques with two isocenter conditions—IMRT using a single isocenter (IMRT_Iso1), VMAT using a single isocenter (VMAT_Iso1), IMRT using dual isocenters (IMRT_Iso2), and VMAT using dual isocenters (VMAT_Iso2). A dose of 42.56 Gy in 16 fractions was prescribed for the planning target volume (PTV). All plans were calculated using the Acuros XB algorithm and a photon optimizer for a 6‐MV beam of a Vital Beam linear accelerator. PTV‐related dosimetric parameters were analyzed. Further, the homogeneity index, conformity index, and conformation number were computed to evaluate plan quality. Dosimetric parameters were also measured for the organs at risk (OARs). In addition, the equivalent uniform dose corresponding to an equivalent dose related to a reference of 2 Gy per fraction, the tumor control probability, and the normal tissue complication probability were calculated based on the dose–volume histogram to investigate the radiobiological impact on PTV and OARs. IMRT_Iso1 exhibited similar target coverage and a certain degree of dosimetric improvement in OAR sparing compared to the other techniques. It also exhibited some radiobiological improvement, albeit insignificant. Although IMRT_Iso1 significantly increased monitor unit compared to VMAT_Iso1, which is the best option in terms of delivery efficiency, there was only a 22% increase in delivery time. Therefore, in conclusion, IMRT_Iso1, the complete treatment of which can be completed using a single setup, is the most effective method for treating SBBC. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9359036/ /pubmed/35727562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13706 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Kang, Sang‐Won Kang, Seonghee Lee, Boram Song, Changhoon Eom, Keun‐Yong Jang, Bum‐Sup Kim, In Ah Kim, Jae‐Sung Cho, Woong Shin, Dong‐Suk Kim, Jin‐Young Chung, Jin‐Beom Evaluation of the dosimetric and radiobiological parameters in four radiotherapy regimens for synchronous bilateral breast cancer |
title | Evaluation of the dosimetric and radiobiological parameters in four radiotherapy regimens for synchronous bilateral breast cancer |
title_full | Evaluation of the dosimetric and radiobiological parameters in four radiotherapy regimens for synchronous bilateral breast cancer |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the dosimetric and radiobiological parameters in four radiotherapy regimens for synchronous bilateral breast cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the dosimetric and radiobiological parameters in four radiotherapy regimens for synchronous bilateral breast cancer |
title_short | Evaluation of the dosimetric and radiobiological parameters in four radiotherapy regimens for synchronous bilateral breast cancer |
title_sort | evaluation of the dosimetric and radiobiological parameters in four radiotherapy regimens for synchronous bilateral breast cancer |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9359036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35727562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13706 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kangsangwon evaluationofthedosimetricandradiobiologicalparametersinfourradiotherapyregimensforsynchronousbilateralbreastcancer AT kangseonghee evaluationofthedosimetricandradiobiologicalparametersinfourradiotherapyregimensforsynchronousbilateralbreastcancer AT leeboram evaluationofthedosimetricandradiobiologicalparametersinfourradiotherapyregimensforsynchronousbilateralbreastcancer AT songchanghoon evaluationofthedosimetricandradiobiologicalparametersinfourradiotherapyregimensforsynchronousbilateralbreastcancer AT eomkeunyong evaluationofthedosimetricandradiobiologicalparametersinfourradiotherapyregimensforsynchronousbilateralbreastcancer AT jangbumsup evaluationofthedosimetricandradiobiologicalparametersinfourradiotherapyregimensforsynchronousbilateralbreastcancer AT kiminah evaluationofthedosimetricandradiobiologicalparametersinfourradiotherapyregimensforsynchronousbilateralbreastcancer AT kimjaesung evaluationofthedosimetricandradiobiologicalparametersinfourradiotherapyregimensforsynchronousbilateralbreastcancer AT chowoong evaluationofthedosimetricandradiobiologicalparametersinfourradiotherapyregimensforsynchronousbilateralbreastcancer AT shindongsuk evaluationofthedosimetricandradiobiologicalparametersinfourradiotherapyregimensforsynchronousbilateralbreastcancer AT kimjinyoung evaluationofthedosimetricandradiobiologicalparametersinfourradiotherapyregimensforsynchronousbilateralbreastcancer AT chungjinbeom evaluationofthedosimetricandradiobiologicalparametersinfourradiotherapyregimensforsynchronousbilateralbreastcancer |