Cargando…
Association of dry eye disease with smoking: A systematic review and meta-analysis
There is conflicting evidence for the association between smoking and dry eye disease (DED). We conducted a meta-analysis to determine the true relationship between smoking and DED. A systematic literature search was performed using electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9359251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35647954 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2193_21 |
_version_ | 1784764102225166336 |
---|---|
author | Tariq, Muhammad Ali Amin, Hamza Ahmed, Bilal Ali, Uzair Mohiuddin, Ashar |
author_facet | Tariq, Muhammad Ali Amin, Hamza Ahmed, Bilal Ali, Uzair Mohiuddin, Ashar |
author_sort | Tariq, Muhammad Ali |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is conflicting evidence for the association between smoking and dry eye disease (DED). We conducted a meta-analysis to determine the true relationship between smoking and DED. A systematic literature search was performed using electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library, till August 2021 to identify observational studies with data on smoking as risk factor of DED. Quality assessment of the included studies was conducted using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklists. The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled odds ratio (OR). Heterogeneity was evaluated by Cochrane Q and I(2) index; in addition, subgroup, sensitivity, and meta-regression analyses were performed. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plot and Egger’s regression test. A total of 22 studies (4 cohort and 18 cross-sectional studies) with 160,217 subjects met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. There is no statistically significant relationship between current smokers (OR(adjusted) = 1.14; 95% CI: 0.95–1.36; P = 0.15; I(2) = 84%) and former smokers (OR(adjusted) = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.93–1.20; P = 0.38; I(2) = 26.7%) for the risk of DED. The results remained consistent across various subgroups. No risk of publication bias was detected by funnel plot and Eggers’s test (P > 0.05). No source of heterogeneity was observed in the meta-regression analysis. Our meta-analysis suggest current or former smoking may not be involved in the risk of dry eye disease. Further studies to understand the mechanism of interaction between current smokers and formers smokers with DED are recommended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9359251 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93592512022-08-10 Association of dry eye disease with smoking: A systematic review and meta-analysis Tariq, Muhammad Ali Amin, Hamza Ahmed, Bilal Ali, Uzair Mohiuddin, Ashar Indian J Ophthalmol Review Article There is conflicting evidence for the association between smoking and dry eye disease (DED). We conducted a meta-analysis to determine the true relationship between smoking and DED. A systematic literature search was performed using electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library, till August 2021 to identify observational studies with data on smoking as risk factor of DED. Quality assessment of the included studies was conducted using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklists. The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled odds ratio (OR). Heterogeneity was evaluated by Cochrane Q and I(2) index; in addition, subgroup, sensitivity, and meta-regression analyses were performed. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plot and Egger’s regression test. A total of 22 studies (4 cohort and 18 cross-sectional studies) with 160,217 subjects met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. There is no statistically significant relationship between current smokers (OR(adjusted) = 1.14; 95% CI: 0.95–1.36; P = 0.15; I(2) = 84%) and former smokers (OR(adjusted) = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.93–1.20; P = 0.38; I(2) = 26.7%) for the risk of DED. The results remained consistent across various subgroups. No risk of publication bias was detected by funnel plot and Eggers’s test (P > 0.05). No source of heterogeneity was observed in the meta-regression analysis. Our meta-analysis suggest current or former smoking may not be involved in the risk of dry eye disease. Further studies to understand the mechanism of interaction between current smokers and formers smokers with DED are recommended. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-06 2022-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9359251/ /pubmed/35647954 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2193_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Tariq, Muhammad Ali Amin, Hamza Ahmed, Bilal Ali, Uzair Mohiuddin, Ashar Association of dry eye disease with smoking: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Association of dry eye disease with smoking: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Association of dry eye disease with smoking: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Association of dry eye disease with smoking: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Association of dry eye disease with smoking: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Association of dry eye disease with smoking: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | association of dry eye disease with smoking: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9359251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35647954 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2193_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tariqmuhammadali associationofdryeyediseasewithsmokingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT aminhamza associationofdryeyediseasewithsmokingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ahmedbilal associationofdryeyediseasewithsmokingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT aliuzair associationofdryeyediseasewithsmokingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mohiuddinashar associationofdryeyediseasewithsmokingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |