Cargando…

Programmatic Adoption and Implementation of Video-Observed Therapy in Minnesota: Prospective Observational Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: In-person directly observed therapy (DOT) is standard of care for tuberculosis (TB) treatment adherence monitoring in the US, with increasing use of video-DOT (vDOT). In Minneapolis, vDOT became available in 2019. OBJECTIVE: In this paper, we aimed to evaluate the use and effectiveness o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bachina, Preetham, Lippincott, Christopher Kirk, Perry, Allison, Munk, Elizabeth, Maltas, Gina, Bohr, Rebecca, Rock, Robert Bryan, Shah, Maunank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9359306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35834671
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/38247
_version_ 1784764116239384576
author Bachina, Preetham
Lippincott, Christopher Kirk
Perry, Allison
Munk, Elizabeth
Maltas, Gina
Bohr, Rebecca
Rock, Robert Bryan
Shah, Maunank
author_facet Bachina, Preetham
Lippincott, Christopher Kirk
Perry, Allison
Munk, Elizabeth
Maltas, Gina
Bohr, Rebecca
Rock, Robert Bryan
Shah, Maunank
author_sort Bachina, Preetham
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In-person directly observed therapy (DOT) is standard of care for tuberculosis (TB) treatment adherence monitoring in the US, with increasing use of video-DOT (vDOT). In Minneapolis, vDOT became available in 2019. OBJECTIVE: In this paper, we aimed to evaluate the use and effectiveness of vDOT in a program setting, including comparison of verified adherence among those receiving vDOT and in-person DOT. We also sought to understand the impact of COVID-19 on TB treatment adherence and technology adoption. METHODS: We abstracted routinely collected data on individuals receiving therapy for TB in Minneapolis, MN, between September 2019 and June 2021. Our primary outcomes were to assess vDOT use and treatment adherence, defined as the proportion of prescribed doses (7 days per week) verified by observation (in person versus video-DOT), and to compare individuals receiving therapy in the pre–COVID-19 (before March 2020), and post–COVID-19 (after March 2020) periods; within the post–COVID-19 period, we evaluated early COVID-19 (March-August 2020), and intra–COVID-19 (after August 2020) periods. RESULTS: Among 49 patients with TB (mean age 41, SD 19; n=27, 55% female and n=47, 96% non–US born), 18 (36.7%) received treatment during the post–COVID-19 period. Overall, verified adherence (proportion of observed doses) was significantly higher when using vDOT (mean 81%, SD 17.4) compared to in-person DOT (mean 54.5%, SD 10.9; P=.001). The adoption of vDOT increased significantly from 35% (11/31) of patients with TB in the pre–COVID-19 period to 67% (12/18) in the post–COVID-19 period (P=.04). Consequently, overall verified (ie, observed) adherence among all patients with TB in the clinic improved across the study periods (56%, 67%, and 79%, P=.001 for the pre–, early, and intra–COVID-19 periods, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: vDOT use increased after the COVID-19 period, was more effective than in-person DOT at verifying ingestion of prescribed treatment, and led to overall increased verified adherence in the clinic despite the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9359306
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93593062022-08-10 Programmatic Adoption and Implementation of Video-Observed Therapy in Minnesota: Prospective Observational Cohort Study Bachina, Preetham Lippincott, Christopher Kirk Perry, Allison Munk, Elizabeth Maltas, Gina Bohr, Rebecca Rock, Robert Bryan Shah, Maunank JMIR Form Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: In-person directly observed therapy (DOT) is standard of care for tuberculosis (TB) treatment adherence monitoring in the US, with increasing use of video-DOT (vDOT). In Minneapolis, vDOT became available in 2019. OBJECTIVE: In this paper, we aimed to evaluate the use and effectiveness of vDOT in a program setting, including comparison of verified adherence among those receiving vDOT and in-person DOT. We also sought to understand the impact of COVID-19 on TB treatment adherence and technology adoption. METHODS: We abstracted routinely collected data on individuals receiving therapy for TB in Minneapolis, MN, between September 2019 and June 2021. Our primary outcomes were to assess vDOT use and treatment adherence, defined as the proportion of prescribed doses (7 days per week) verified by observation (in person versus video-DOT), and to compare individuals receiving therapy in the pre–COVID-19 (before March 2020), and post–COVID-19 (after March 2020) periods; within the post–COVID-19 period, we evaluated early COVID-19 (March-August 2020), and intra–COVID-19 (after August 2020) periods. RESULTS: Among 49 patients with TB (mean age 41, SD 19; n=27, 55% female and n=47, 96% non–US born), 18 (36.7%) received treatment during the post–COVID-19 period. Overall, verified adherence (proportion of observed doses) was significantly higher when using vDOT (mean 81%, SD 17.4) compared to in-person DOT (mean 54.5%, SD 10.9; P=.001). The adoption of vDOT increased significantly from 35% (11/31) of patients with TB in the pre–COVID-19 period to 67% (12/18) in the post–COVID-19 period (P=.04). Consequently, overall verified (ie, observed) adherence among all patients with TB in the clinic improved across the study periods (56%, 67%, and 79%, P=.001 for the pre–, early, and intra–COVID-19 periods, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: vDOT use increased after the COVID-19 period, was more effective than in-person DOT at verifying ingestion of prescribed treatment, and led to overall increased verified adherence in the clinic despite the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. JMIR Publications 2022-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9359306/ /pubmed/35834671 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/38247 Text en ©Preetham Bachina, Christopher Kirk Lippincott, Allison Perry, Elizabeth Munk, Gina Maltas, Rebecca Bohr, Robert Bryan Rock, Maunank Shah. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 05.08.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Bachina, Preetham
Lippincott, Christopher Kirk
Perry, Allison
Munk, Elizabeth
Maltas, Gina
Bohr, Rebecca
Rock, Robert Bryan
Shah, Maunank
Programmatic Adoption and Implementation of Video-Observed Therapy in Minnesota: Prospective Observational Cohort Study
title Programmatic Adoption and Implementation of Video-Observed Therapy in Minnesota: Prospective Observational Cohort Study
title_full Programmatic Adoption and Implementation of Video-Observed Therapy in Minnesota: Prospective Observational Cohort Study
title_fullStr Programmatic Adoption and Implementation of Video-Observed Therapy in Minnesota: Prospective Observational Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Programmatic Adoption and Implementation of Video-Observed Therapy in Minnesota: Prospective Observational Cohort Study
title_short Programmatic Adoption and Implementation of Video-Observed Therapy in Minnesota: Prospective Observational Cohort Study
title_sort programmatic adoption and implementation of video-observed therapy in minnesota: prospective observational cohort study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9359306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35834671
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/38247
work_keys_str_mv AT bachinapreetham programmaticadoptionandimplementationofvideoobservedtherapyinminnesotaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT lippincottchristopherkirk programmaticadoptionandimplementationofvideoobservedtherapyinminnesotaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT perryallison programmaticadoptionandimplementationofvideoobservedtherapyinminnesotaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT munkelizabeth programmaticadoptionandimplementationofvideoobservedtherapyinminnesotaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT maltasgina programmaticadoptionandimplementationofvideoobservedtherapyinminnesotaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT bohrrebecca programmaticadoptionandimplementationofvideoobservedtherapyinminnesotaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT rockrobertbryan programmaticadoptionandimplementationofvideoobservedtherapyinminnesotaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT shahmaunank programmaticadoptionandimplementationofvideoobservedtherapyinminnesotaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy