Cargando…
A mixed methods study evaluating acceptability of a daily COVID-19 testing regimen with a mobile-app connected, at-home, rapid antigen test: Implications for current and future pandemics
BACKGROUND: Widespread use of at-home rapid COVID-19 antigen tests has been proposed as an important public health intervention to interrupt chains of transmission. Antigen tests may be preferred over PCR because they provide on-demand results for relatively low cost and can identify people when the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9359568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35939422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267766 |
_version_ | 1784764168529772544 |
---|---|
author | Nguyen, Nadia Lane, Benjamin Lee, Sangwon Gorman, Sharon Lipsky Wu, Yumeng Li, Alicia Lu, Helen Elhadad, Noemie Yin, Michael Meyers, Kathrine |
author_facet | Nguyen, Nadia Lane, Benjamin Lee, Sangwon Gorman, Sharon Lipsky Wu, Yumeng Li, Alicia Lu, Helen Elhadad, Noemie Yin, Michael Meyers, Kathrine |
author_sort | Nguyen, Nadia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Widespread use of at-home rapid COVID-19 antigen tests has been proposed as an important public health intervention to interrupt chains of transmission. Antigen tests may be preferred over PCR because they provide on-demand results for relatively low cost and can identify people when they are most likely to be infectious, particularly when used daily. Yet the extent to which a frequent antigen testing intervention will result in a positive public health impact for COVID-19 will depend on high acceptability and high adherence to such regimens. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study assessing acceptability of and adherence to a daily at-home mobile-app connected rapid antigen testing regimen among employees of a US-based media company. Acceptability was assessed across seven domains of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. RESULTS: Among 31 study participants, acceptability of the daily testing intervention was generally high, with participants reporting high perceived effectiveness, intervention coherence, and self-efficacy; positive affective attitude; acceptable degree of burden and opportunity cost; and assessing the intervention as ethical. 71% reported a preference to test daily using an at-home antigen test than weekly employment-based PCR. Mean adherence to the 21-day testing regimen was 88% with 43% of participants achieving 100% adherence, 48% testing at least every other day, and 10% testing less than every other day. CONCLUSIONS: Despite overall high acceptability and adherence, we identified three implementation challenges that must be addressed for frequent serial testing for COVID-19 to be implemented at scale and have a positive public health impact. First, users need guidance on how and when to adapt testing frequencies to different epidemiological conditions. Second, users and institutions need guidelines for how to safely store and share test results. Third, implementation of serial testing strategies must prioritize health equity and protect those most vulnerable to COVID-19. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9359568 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93595682022-08-10 A mixed methods study evaluating acceptability of a daily COVID-19 testing regimen with a mobile-app connected, at-home, rapid antigen test: Implications for current and future pandemics Nguyen, Nadia Lane, Benjamin Lee, Sangwon Gorman, Sharon Lipsky Wu, Yumeng Li, Alicia Lu, Helen Elhadad, Noemie Yin, Michael Meyers, Kathrine PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Widespread use of at-home rapid COVID-19 antigen tests has been proposed as an important public health intervention to interrupt chains of transmission. Antigen tests may be preferred over PCR because they provide on-demand results for relatively low cost and can identify people when they are most likely to be infectious, particularly when used daily. Yet the extent to which a frequent antigen testing intervention will result in a positive public health impact for COVID-19 will depend on high acceptability and high adherence to such regimens. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study assessing acceptability of and adherence to a daily at-home mobile-app connected rapid antigen testing regimen among employees of a US-based media company. Acceptability was assessed across seven domains of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. RESULTS: Among 31 study participants, acceptability of the daily testing intervention was generally high, with participants reporting high perceived effectiveness, intervention coherence, and self-efficacy; positive affective attitude; acceptable degree of burden and opportunity cost; and assessing the intervention as ethical. 71% reported a preference to test daily using an at-home antigen test than weekly employment-based PCR. Mean adherence to the 21-day testing regimen was 88% with 43% of participants achieving 100% adherence, 48% testing at least every other day, and 10% testing less than every other day. CONCLUSIONS: Despite overall high acceptability and adherence, we identified three implementation challenges that must be addressed for frequent serial testing for COVID-19 to be implemented at scale and have a positive public health impact. First, users need guidance on how and when to adapt testing frequencies to different epidemiological conditions. Second, users and institutions need guidelines for how to safely store and share test results. Third, implementation of serial testing strategies must prioritize health equity and protect those most vulnerable to COVID-19. Public Library of Science 2022-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9359568/ /pubmed/35939422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267766 Text en © 2022 Nguyen et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nguyen, Nadia Lane, Benjamin Lee, Sangwon Gorman, Sharon Lipsky Wu, Yumeng Li, Alicia Lu, Helen Elhadad, Noemie Yin, Michael Meyers, Kathrine A mixed methods study evaluating acceptability of a daily COVID-19 testing regimen with a mobile-app connected, at-home, rapid antigen test: Implications for current and future pandemics |
title | A mixed methods study evaluating acceptability of a daily COVID-19 testing regimen with a mobile-app connected, at-home, rapid antigen test: Implications for current and future pandemics |
title_full | A mixed methods study evaluating acceptability of a daily COVID-19 testing regimen with a mobile-app connected, at-home, rapid antigen test: Implications for current and future pandemics |
title_fullStr | A mixed methods study evaluating acceptability of a daily COVID-19 testing regimen with a mobile-app connected, at-home, rapid antigen test: Implications for current and future pandemics |
title_full_unstemmed | A mixed methods study evaluating acceptability of a daily COVID-19 testing regimen with a mobile-app connected, at-home, rapid antigen test: Implications for current and future pandemics |
title_short | A mixed methods study evaluating acceptability of a daily COVID-19 testing regimen with a mobile-app connected, at-home, rapid antigen test: Implications for current and future pandemics |
title_sort | mixed methods study evaluating acceptability of a daily covid-19 testing regimen with a mobile-app connected, at-home, rapid antigen test: implications for current and future pandemics |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9359568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35939422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267766 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nguyennadia amixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics AT lanebenjamin amixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics AT leesangwon amixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics AT gormansharonlipsky amixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics AT wuyumeng amixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics AT lialicia amixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics AT luhelen amixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics AT elhadadnoemie amixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics AT yinmichael amixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics AT meyerskathrine amixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics AT nguyennadia mixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics AT lanebenjamin mixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics AT leesangwon mixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics AT gormansharonlipsky mixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics AT wuyumeng mixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics AT lialicia mixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics AT luhelen mixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics AT elhadadnoemie mixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics AT yinmichael mixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics AT meyerskathrine mixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics |