Cargando…

A mixed methods study evaluating acceptability of a daily COVID-19 testing regimen with a mobile-app connected, at-home, rapid antigen test: Implications for current and future pandemics

BACKGROUND: Widespread use of at-home rapid COVID-19 antigen tests has been proposed as an important public health intervention to interrupt chains of transmission. Antigen tests may be preferred over PCR because they provide on-demand results for relatively low cost and can identify people when the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nguyen, Nadia, Lane, Benjamin, Lee, Sangwon, Gorman, Sharon Lipsky, Wu, Yumeng, Li, Alicia, Lu, Helen, Elhadad, Noemie, Yin, Michael, Meyers, Kathrine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9359568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35939422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267766
_version_ 1784764168529772544
author Nguyen, Nadia
Lane, Benjamin
Lee, Sangwon
Gorman, Sharon Lipsky
Wu, Yumeng
Li, Alicia
Lu, Helen
Elhadad, Noemie
Yin, Michael
Meyers, Kathrine
author_facet Nguyen, Nadia
Lane, Benjamin
Lee, Sangwon
Gorman, Sharon Lipsky
Wu, Yumeng
Li, Alicia
Lu, Helen
Elhadad, Noemie
Yin, Michael
Meyers, Kathrine
author_sort Nguyen, Nadia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Widespread use of at-home rapid COVID-19 antigen tests has been proposed as an important public health intervention to interrupt chains of transmission. Antigen tests may be preferred over PCR because they provide on-demand results for relatively low cost and can identify people when they are most likely to be infectious, particularly when used daily. Yet the extent to which a frequent antigen testing intervention will result in a positive public health impact for COVID-19 will depend on high acceptability and high adherence to such regimens. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study assessing acceptability of and adherence to a daily at-home mobile-app connected rapid antigen testing regimen among employees of a US-based media company. Acceptability was assessed across seven domains of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. RESULTS: Among 31 study participants, acceptability of the daily testing intervention was generally high, with participants reporting high perceived effectiveness, intervention coherence, and self-efficacy; positive affective attitude; acceptable degree of burden and opportunity cost; and assessing the intervention as ethical. 71% reported a preference to test daily using an at-home antigen test than weekly employment-based PCR. Mean adherence to the 21-day testing regimen was 88% with 43% of participants achieving 100% adherence, 48% testing at least every other day, and 10% testing less than every other day. CONCLUSIONS: Despite overall high acceptability and adherence, we identified three implementation challenges that must be addressed for frequent serial testing for COVID-19 to be implemented at scale and have a positive public health impact. First, users need guidance on how and when to adapt testing frequencies to different epidemiological conditions. Second, users and institutions need guidelines for how to safely store and share test results. Third, implementation of serial testing strategies must prioritize health equity and protect those most vulnerable to COVID-19.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9359568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93595682022-08-10 A mixed methods study evaluating acceptability of a daily COVID-19 testing regimen with a mobile-app connected, at-home, rapid antigen test: Implications for current and future pandemics Nguyen, Nadia Lane, Benjamin Lee, Sangwon Gorman, Sharon Lipsky Wu, Yumeng Li, Alicia Lu, Helen Elhadad, Noemie Yin, Michael Meyers, Kathrine PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Widespread use of at-home rapid COVID-19 antigen tests has been proposed as an important public health intervention to interrupt chains of transmission. Antigen tests may be preferred over PCR because they provide on-demand results for relatively low cost and can identify people when they are most likely to be infectious, particularly when used daily. Yet the extent to which a frequent antigen testing intervention will result in a positive public health impact for COVID-19 will depend on high acceptability and high adherence to such regimens. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study assessing acceptability of and adherence to a daily at-home mobile-app connected rapid antigen testing regimen among employees of a US-based media company. Acceptability was assessed across seven domains of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. RESULTS: Among 31 study participants, acceptability of the daily testing intervention was generally high, with participants reporting high perceived effectiveness, intervention coherence, and self-efficacy; positive affective attitude; acceptable degree of burden and opportunity cost; and assessing the intervention as ethical. 71% reported a preference to test daily using an at-home antigen test than weekly employment-based PCR. Mean adherence to the 21-day testing regimen was 88% with 43% of participants achieving 100% adherence, 48% testing at least every other day, and 10% testing less than every other day. CONCLUSIONS: Despite overall high acceptability and adherence, we identified three implementation challenges that must be addressed for frequent serial testing for COVID-19 to be implemented at scale and have a positive public health impact. First, users need guidance on how and when to adapt testing frequencies to different epidemiological conditions. Second, users and institutions need guidelines for how to safely store and share test results. Third, implementation of serial testing strategies must prioritize health equity and protect those most vulnerable to COVID-19. Public Library of Science 2022-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9359568/ /pubmed/35939422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267766 Text en © 2022 Nguyen et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nguyen, Nadia
Lane, Benjamin
Lee, Sangwon
Gorman, Sharon Lipsky
Wu, Yumeng
Li, Alicia
Lu, Helen
Elhadad, Noemie
Yin, Michael
Meyers, Kathrine
A mixed methods study evaluating acceptability of a daily COVID-19 testing regimen with a mobile-app connected, at-home, rapid antigen test: Implications for current and future pandemics
title A mixed methods study evaluating acceptability of a daily COVID-19 testing regimen with a mobile-app connected, at-home, rapid antigen test: Implications for current and future pandemics
title_full A mixed methods study evaluating acceptability of a daily COVID-19 testing regimen with a mobile-app connected, at-home, rapid antigen test: Implications for current and future pandemics
title_fullStr A mixed methods study evaluating acceptability of a daily COVID-19 testing regimen with a mobile-app connected, at-home, rapid antigen test: Implications for current and future pandemics
title_full_unstemmed A mixed methods study evaluating acceptability of a daily COVID-19 testing regimen with a mobile-app connected, at-home, rapid antigen test: Implications for current and future pandemics
title_short A mixed methods study evaluating acceptability of a daily COVID-19 testing regimen with a mobile-app connected, at-home, rapid antigen test: Implications for current and future pandemics
title_sort mixed methods study evaluating acceptability of a daily covid-19 testing regimen with a mobile-app connected, at-home, rapid antigen test: implications for current and future pandemics
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9359568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35939422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267766
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyennadia amixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics
AT lanebenjamin amixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics
AT leesangwon amixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics
AT gormansharonlipsky amixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics
AT wuyumeng amixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics
AT lialicia amixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics
AT luhelen amixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics
AT elhadadnoemie amixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics
AT yinmichael amixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics
AT meyerskathrine amixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics
AT nguyennadia mixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics
AT lanebenjamin mixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics
AT leesangwon mixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics
AT gormansharonlipsky mixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics
AT wuyumeng mixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics
AT lialicia mixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics
AT luhelen mixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics
AT elhadadnoemie mixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics
AT yinmichael mixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics
AT meyerskathrine mixedmethodsstudyevaluatingacceptabilityofadailycovid19testingregimenwithamobileappconnectedathomerapidantigentestimplicationsforcurrentandfuturepandemics