Cargando…
Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Measurement: Comparison of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Fat Content Evaluation by Dixon Chemical Shift MRI
BACKGROUND: To assess whether the fat signal intensity and fat fraction (FF) of the lumbar vertebrae as measured on the Dixon chemical shift magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique can be correlated with the lumbar vertebra bone mineral density (BMD) measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometr...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9359785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35957757 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S370814 |
_version_ | 1784764208284434432 |
---|---|
author | Chang, Fei-xia Fan, Dun-hui Huang, Gang He, Jian-hong |
author_facet | Chang, Fei-xia Fan, Dun-hui Huang, Gang He, Jian-hong |
author_sort | Chang, Fei-xia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To assess whether the fat signal intensity and fat fraction (FF) of the lumbar vertebrae as measured on the Dixon chemical shift magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique can be correlated with the lumbar vertebra bone mineral density (BMD) measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). METHODS: Forty-five patients were retrospectively collected, and 180 lumbar vertebral bodies (L1-L4) were included. All patients underwent DXA and MRI examinations of the lumbar spine. Taking the T value of DXA as the gold standard and using the diagnostic criteria of the World Health Organization: T score ≥ −1.0SD as normal, −1.0 ~ −2.5SD as osteopenia, and ≤ −2.5SD as osteoporosis. Meanwhile, the signal intensity on T2WI was measured, and FF of L1-L4 vertebral bodies was calculated on MRI images. Bone marrow fat FF calculation formula: FF = [Mfat/(Mfat + Mwater)] × 100% (Mwater and Mfat refer to the total pixel signal intensity value of the region of interest in water image and lipid image, respectively). Finally, the association of signal intensity and FF with DXA was evaluated. RESULTS: Totally 180 vertebral bodies in 45 patients were enrolled. According to the T value, they were divided into the normal group (n = 70), osteopenia group (n = 40), and osteoporosis group (n = 70). The fat signal intensity of the normal group, osteopenia group, and osteoporosis group were 96.6 ± 21.8, 154.5 ± 48.7, 216.3 ± 92.6, and the FF were 30.1 ± 6.2%, 52.6 ± 7.6%, 77.5 ± 7.9%, respectively. Among the three groups, the lumbar T2 fat signal intensity and FF had statistical differences (P < 0.01). Besides, the lumbar fat signal intensity and FF were negatively related to DXA (r =−0.65 and −0.93, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The fat content calculated using the Dixon chemical shift MRI had an inverse relation with BMD. Moreover, the Dixon chemical shift MRI might provide complementary information to osteoporosis-related research fields. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9359785 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93597852022-08-10 Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Measurement: Comparison of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Fat Content Evaluation by Dixon Chemical Shift MRI Chang, Fei-xia Fan, Dun-hui Huang, Gang He, Jian-hong Int J Gen Med Original Research BACKGROUND: To assess whether the fat signal intensity and fat fraction (FF) of the lumbar vertebrae as measured on the Dixon chemical shift magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique can be correlated with the lumbar vertebra bone mineral density (BMD) measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). METHODS: Forty-five patients were retrospectively collected, and 180 lumbar vertebral bodies (L1-L4) were included. All patients underwent DXA and MRI examinations of the lumbar spine. Taking the T value of DXA as the gold standard and using the diagnostic criteria of the World Health Organization: T score ≥ −1.0SD as normal, −1.0 ~ −2.5SD as osteopenia, and ≤ −2.5SD as osteoporosis. Meanwhile, the signal intensity on T2WI was measured, and FF of L1-L4 vertebral bodies was calculated on MRI images. Bone marrow fat FF calculation formula: FF = [Mfat/(Mfat + Mwater)] × 100% (Mwater and Mfat refer to the total pixel signal intensity value of the region of interest in water image and lipid image, respectively). Finally, the association of signal intensity and FF with DXA was evaluated. RESULTS: Totally 180 vertebral bodies in 45 patients were enrolled. According to the T value, they were divided into the normal group (n = 70), osteopenia group (n = 40), and osteoporosis group (n = 70). The fat signal intensity of the normal group, osteopenia group, and osteoporosis group were 96.6 ± 21.8, 154.5 ± 48.7, 216.3 ± 92.6, and the FF were 30.1 ± 6.2%, 52.6 ± 7.6%, 77.5 ± 7.9%, respectively. Among the three groups, the lumbar T2 fat signal intensity and FF had statistical differences (P < 0.01). Besides, the lumbar fat signal intensity and FF were negatively related to DXA (r =−0.65 and −0.93, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The fat content calculated using the Dixon chemical shift MRI had an inverse relation with BMD. Moreover, the Dixon chemical shift MRI might provide complementary information to osteoporosis-related research fields. Dove 2022-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9359785/ /pubmed/35957757 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S370814 Text en © 2022 Chang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Chang, Fei-xia Fan, Dun-hui Huang, Gang He, Jian-hong Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Measurement: Comparison of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Fat Content Evaluation by Dixon Chemical Shift MRI |
title | Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Measurement: Comparison of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Fat Content Evaluation by Dixon Chemical Shift MRI |
title_full | Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Measurement: Comparison of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Fat Content Evaluation by Dixon Chemical Shift MRI |
title_fullStr | Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Measurement: Comparison of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Fat Content Evaluation by Dixon Chemical Shift MRI |
title_full_unstemmed | Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Measurement: Comparison of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Fat Content Evaluation by Dixon Chemical Shift MRI |
title_short | Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Measurement: Comparison of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Fat Content Evaluation by Dixon Chemical Shift MRI |
title_sort | lumbar spine bone mineral density measurement: comparison of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and fat content evaluation by dixon chemical shift mri |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9359785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35957757 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S370814 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT changfeixia lumbarspinebonemineraldensitymeasurementcomparisonofdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryandfatcontentevaluationbydixonchemicalshiftmri AT fandunhui lumbarspinebonemineraldensitymeasurementcomparisonofdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryandfatcontentevaluationbydixonchemicalshiftmri AT huanggang lumbarspinebonemineraldensitymeasurementcomparisonofdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryandfatcontentevaluationbydixonchemicalshiftmri AT hejianhong lumbarspinebonemineraldensitymeasurementcomparisonofdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryandfatcontentevaluationbydixonchemicalshiftmri |