Cargando…

Adhesive Ability of Different Oral Pathogens to Various Dental Materials: An In Vitro Study

INTRODUCTION: In dental treatments, the reason for secondary caries and the failure of root canal treatment is the microbial infection, which concerns most dentists. The challenge of how to reduce the number of bacteria at the filling materials and the number of residual bacteria in the root canal h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tu, Yan, Deng, Shuli, Wang, Yuan, Lin, Xiaolong, Yang, Zhenyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9359852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35959001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9595067
_version_ 1784764222734860288
author Tu, Yan
Deng, Shuli
Wang, Yuan
Lin, Xiaolong
Yang, Zhenyu
author_facet Tu, Yan
Deng, Shuli
Wang, Yuan
Lin, Xiaolong
Yang, Zhenyu
author_sort Tu, Yan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In dental treatments, the reason for secondary caries and the failure of root canal treatment is the microbial infection, which concerns most dentists. The challenge of how to reduce the number of bacteria at the filling materials and the number of residual bacteria in the root canal has become a research hotspot. In this study, the bacterial adhesion properties of several common dental materials were compared to provide a theoretical basis for the selection of antibacterial properties of dental materials. Methodology. Three commonly used dental restorative materials and five sealers in root canal treatment were selected. Each material block was immersed in the corresponding supragingival (Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces viscosus) or subgingival (Porphyromonas gingivalis and Enterococcus faecalis) bacterial solution and cultured under anaerobic conditions at 37°C for 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 h. The adhesion of bacteria was observed, and the number of different bacteria adhering to various material model disks was calculated at different time intervals under a scanning electron microscope. The adherent CFU load of the materials was determined by colony counting. RESULTS: Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces viscosus exhibited the strongest adhesion ability to the resin material blocks. Porphyromonas gingivalis and Enterococcus faecalis exhibited the highest adhesion ability to the AH-Plus sealer block. CONCLUSIONS: In dental treatments, dental materials should be selected based on the chemical, physical, and biological properties of materials. In addition, it is necessary to develop new antibacterial dental materials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9359852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93598522022-08-10 Adhesive Ability of Different Oral Pathogens to Various Dental Materials: An In Vitro Study Tu, Yan Deng, Shuli Wang, Yuan Lin, Xiaolong Yang, Zhenyu Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol Research Article INTRODUCTION: In dental treatments, the reason for secondary caries and the failure of root canal treatment is the microbial infection, which concerns most dentists. The challenge of how to reduce the number of bacteria at the filling materials and the number of residual bacteria in the root canal has become a research hotspot. In this study, the bacterial adhesion properties of several common dental materials were compared to provide a theoretical basis for the selection of antibacterial properties of dental materials. Methodology. Three commonly used dental restorative materials and five sealers in root canal treatment were selected. Each material block was immersed in the corresponding supragingival (Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces viscosus) or subgingival (Porphyromonas gingivalis and Enterococcus faecalis) bacterial solution and cultured under anaerobic conditions at 37°C for 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 h. The adhesion of bacteria was observed, and the number of different bacteria adhering to various material model disks was calculated at different time intervals under a scanning electron microscope. The adherent CFU load of the materials was determined by colony counting. RESULTS: Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces viscosus exhibited the strongest adhesion ability to the resin material blocks. Porphyromonas gingivalis and Enterococcus faecalis exhibited the highest adhesion ability to the AH-Plus sealer block. CONCLUSIONS: In dental treatments, dental materials should be selected based on the chemical, physical, and biological properties of materials. In addition, it is necessary to develop new antibacterial dental materials. Hindawi 2022-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9359852/ /pubmed/35959001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9595067 Text en Copyright © 2022 Yan Tu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tu, Yan
Deng, Shuli
Wang, Yuan
Lin, Xiaolong
Yang, Zhenyu
Adhesive Ability of Different Oral Pathogens to Various Dental Materials: An In Vitro Study
title Adhesive Ability of Different Oral Pathogens to Various Dental Materials: An In Vitro Study
title_full Adhesive Ability of Different Oral Pathogens to Various Dental Materials: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Adhesive Ability of Different Oral Pathogens to Various Dental Materials: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Adhesive Ability of Different Oral Pathogens to Various Dental Materials: An In Vitro Study
title_short Adhesive Ability of Different Oral Pathogens to Various Dental Materials: An In Vitro Study
title_sort adhesive ability of different oral pathogens to various dental materials: an in vitro study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9359852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35959001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9595067
work_keys_str_mv AT tuyan adhesiveabilityofdifferentoralpathogenstovariousdentalmaterialsaninvitrostudy
AT dengshuli adhesiveabilityofdifferentoralpathogenstovariousdentalmaterialsaninvitrostudy
AT wangyuan adhesiveabilityofdifferentoralpathogenstovariousdentalmaterialsaninvitrostudy
AT linxiaolong adhesiveabilityofdifferentoralpathogenstovariousdentalmaterialsaninvitrostudy
AT yangzhenyu adhesiveabilityofdifferentoralpathogenstovariousdentalmaterialsaninvitrostudy