Cargando…

Totality outcome of afatinib sequential treatment in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer in South Korea (TOAST): Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG) LU-19-22

BACKGROUND: Irrespective of the first-line epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor chosen, acquired resistance to therapy is inevitable. Therefore, a key consideration when assessing therapeutic choices is the availability of subsequent treatment options following disease p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jung, Hyun Ae, Hong, Min Hee, Lee, Hyun Woo, Lee, Kyung Hee, Kim, Il Hwan, Min, Young Joo, Ahn, Hee Kyung, Shim, Byoung Yong, Choi, Yoon Hee, Lee, Yun-Gyoo, Kim, Jeong A, Jang, Joung Soon, Shin, Seong-Hoon, Park, Keon Uk, Kang, Jin Hyoung, Park, Keunchil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9359965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35958320
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-22-79
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Irrespective of the first-line epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor chosen, acquired resistance to therapy is inevitable. Therefore, a key consideration when assessing therapeutic choices is the availability of subsequent treatment options following disease progression. We assessed clinical outcomes in patients who received first-line afatinib treatment with various second-line treatments including osimertinib for patients acquiring the T790M mutation. METHODS: A total of 737 EGFR mutation-positive (EGFR M+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving first-line afatinib treatment were categorized by second-line treatment: T790M+ sequentially treated with osimertinib (cohort A, n=116); T790M− given chemotherapy or others (cohort B, n=143); patients with unknown T790M status (cohort C, n=111); and patients who were undergoing afatinib treatment at the time of data collection, were dead, had discontinued afatinib treatment due to serious adverse events or were lost to follow-up (cohort D, n=367). The primary outcomes were total time on treatment (TOT) and TOT for first-line (TOT-1) and second-line treatments (TOT-2). Secondary outcomes were objective response rates (ORR), overall survival (OS), and central nervous system (CNS) efficacy. RESULTS: Median total TOT in cohorts A, B, C, and D were 35.10 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 30.09–43.53 months], 18.80 months (95% CI: 16.92–20.20 months), 12.00 months (95% CI: 10.22–14.98 months), and 42.60 months (95% CI: 30.95–59.23 months), respectively. The ORR of patients given afatinib was 75.7%. In patients with initial brain metastasis without local treatment, the CNS response rate was 67.0% and CNS progression-free survival was 24.70 months (95% CI: 19.84–33.15 months). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that sequential approach of afatinib followed by second line treatment is an effective therapeutic strategy for EGFR M+ NSCLC patients.