Cargando…
The effects of pelvic ring injuries on quality of life, physical, and mental health: results of a 2-year prospective cohort study
PURPOSE: Pelvic ring injuries are known to affect the patients’ daily life in terms of physical functioning and quality of life (QoL). Still, prospective studies on the patient’s perception over the first 2 years of rehabilitation are lacking. Therefore, patients cannot be properly informed about wh...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9360067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35254459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-01893-3 |
_version_ | 1784764271872180224 |
---|---|
author | Banierink, Hester ten Duis, Kaj Meesters, Anne M. L. Trouwborst, Nymke M. Heineman, Erik Wendt, Klaus W. Ploegmakers, Joris J. W. Reininga, Inge H. F. IJpma, Frank F. A. |
author_facet | Banierink, Hester ten Duis, Kaj Meesters, Anne M. L. Trouwborst, Nymke M. Heineman, Erik Wendt, Klaus W. Ploegmakers, Joris J. W. Reininga, Inge H. F. IJpma, Frank F. A. |
author_sort | Banierink, Hester |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Pelvic ring injuries are known to affect the patients’ daily life in terms of physical functioning and quality of life (QoL). Still, prospective studies on the patient’s perception over the first 2 years of rehabilitation are lacking. Therefore, patients cannot be properly informed about whether or when they will return to their pre-existing level of physical functioning and QoL. METHODS: A prospective longitudinal cohort study was performed over a 4-year period including all consecutive patients above 18 years who sustained a pelvic ring injury in a level 1 trauma center. Validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were used to assess physical functioning (SMFA) and QoL (EQ-5D) at baseline (recalled pre-injury score), 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after the injury. It was assessed whether patients had fully recovered by comparing follow-up scores to baseline PROMs. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors for patients who did not fully recover. Most experienced difficulties at 3 months and 1 year were identified by analyzing the highest reported scores on individual items of the SMFA. RESULTS: A total of 297 patients with a pelvic ring injury were identified of which 189 were eligible for follow-up and 154 (82%) responded. Median SMFA function score at 3 months, 1 and 2 years was 70, 78 and 88, respectively, compared to 96 out of 100 before the injury. Median SMFA bother score was 67, 79 and 88, respectively. Median EQ-5D score at 3 months, 1 and 2 years was 0.61, 0.81 and 0.85, respectively, compared to 1 (maximum achievable) before the injury. After 1 and 2 years of follow-up, 61% and 75% of the patients fully “recovered” in physical functioning and 52% and 71% fully recovered in terms of QoL. Female gender and high-energy trauma were independent predictors for not fully recovering after 1 year. After 3 months of follow-up, 54% of patients reported severe difficulties with recreational activities, whereas after 1 year, most experienced difficulties (31% of patients) concerned heavy house or yard work. Moreover, after 3 months and 1 year, 44% and 27% of patients reported feeling physically disabled. CONCLUSION: Pelvic ring injuries have a large impact on the patients’ daily life in the first 2 years of rehabilitation. Directly after the injury, physical functioning and QoL decrease strongly but then gradually improve over a 2-year period with about 75% of patients fully recovering. Female gender and high-energy trauma are shown to be independent predictors for not fully recovering. After 3 months, patients experience difficulties with both the physical and mental effects of the injury which continue to be present after 1 year. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00068-022-01893-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9360067 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93600672022-08-10 The effects of pelvic ring injuries on quality of life, physical, and mental health: results of a 2-year prospective cohort study Banierink, Hester ten Duis, Kaj Meesters, Anne M. L. Trouwborst, Nymke M. Heineman, Erik Wendt, Klaus W. Ploegmakers, Joris J. W. Reininga, Inge H. F. IJpma, Frank F. A. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Original Article PURPOSE: Pelvic ring injuries are known to affect the patients’ daily life in terms of physical functioning and quality of life (QoL). Still, prospective studies on the patient’s perception over the first 2 years of rehabilitation are lacking. Therefore, patients cannot be properly informed about whether or when they will return to their pre-existing level of physical functioning and QoL. METHODS: A prospective longitudinal cohort study was performed over a 4-year period including all consecutive patients above 18 years who sustained a pelvic ring injury in a level 1 trauma center. Validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were used to assess physical functioning (SMFA) and QoL (EQ-5D) at baseline (recalled pre-injury score), 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after the injury. It was assessed whether patients had fully recovered by comparing follow-up scores to baseline PROMs. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors for patients who did not fully recover. Most experienced difficulties at 3 months and 1 year were identified by analyzing the highest reported scores on individual items of the SMFA. RESULTS: A total of 297 patients with a pelvic ring injury were identified of which 189 were eligible for follow-up and 154 (82%) responded. Median SMFA function score at 3 months, 1 and 2 years was 70, 78 and 88, respectively, compared to 96 out of 100 before the injury. Median SMFA bother score was 67, 79 and 88, respectively. Median EQ-5D score at 3 months, 1 and 2 years was 0.61, 0.81 and 0.85, respectively, compared to 1 (maximum achievable) before the injury. After 1 and 2 years of follow-up, 61% and 75% of the patients fully “recovered” in physical functioning and 52% and 71% fully recovered in terms of QoL. Female gender and high-energy trauma were independent predictors for not fully recovering after 1 year. After 3 months of follow-up, 54% of patients reported severe difficulties with recreational activities, whereas after 1 year, most experienced difficulties (31% of patients) concerned heavy house or yard work. Moreover, after 3 months and 1 year, 44% and 27% of patients reported feeling physically disabled. CONCLUSION: Pelvic ring injuries have a large impact on the patients’ daily life in the first 2 years of rehabilitation. Directly after the injury, physical functioning and QoL decrease strongly but then gradually improve over a 2-year period with about 75% of patients fully recovering. Female gender and high-energy trauma are shown to be independent predictors for not fully recovering. After 3 months, patients experience difficulties with both the physical and mental effects of the injury which continue to be present after 1 year. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00068-022-01893-3. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-03-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9360067/ /pubmed/35254459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-01893-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Banierink, Hester ten Duis, Kaj Meesters, Anne M. L. Trouwborst, Nymke M. Heineman, Erik Wendt, Klaus W. Ploegmakers, Joris J. W. Reininga, Inge H. F. IJpma, Frank F. A. The effects of pelvic ring injuries on quality of life, physical, and mental health: results of a 2-year prospective cohort study |
title | The effects of pelvic ring injuries on quality of life, physical, and mental health: results of a 2-year prospective cohort study |
title_full | The effects of pelvic ring injuries on quality of life, physical, and mental health: results of a 2-year prospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | The effects of pelvic ring injuries on quality of life, physical, and mental health: results of a 2-year prospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | The effects of pelvic ring injuries on quality of life, physical, and mental health: results of a 2-year prospective cohort study |
title_short | The effects of pelvic ring injuries on quality of life, physical, and mental health: results of a 2-year prospective cohort study |
title_sort | effects of pelvic ring injuries on quality of life, physical, and mental health: results of a 2-year prospective cohort study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9360067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35254459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-01893-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT banierinkhester theeffectsofpelvicringinjuriesonqualityoflifephysicalandmentalhealthresultsofa2yearprospectivecohortstudy AT tenduiskaj theeffectsofpelvicringinjuriesonqualityoflifephysicalandmentalhealthresultsofa2yearprospectivecohortstudy AT meestersanneml theeffectsofpelvicringinjuriesonqualityoflifephysicalandmentalhealthresultsofa2yearprospectivecohortstudy AT trouwborstnymkem theeffectsofpelvicringinjuriesonqualityoflifephysicalandmentalhealthresultsofa2yearprospectivecohortstudy AT heinemanerik theeffectsofpelvicringinjuriesonqualityoflifephysicalandmentalhealthresultsofa2yearprospectivecohortstudy AT wendtklausw theeffectsofpelvicringinjuriesonqualityoflifephysicalandmentalhealthresultsofa2yearprospectivecohortstudy AT ploegmakersjorisjw theeffectsofpelvicringinjuriesonqualityoflifephysicalandmentalhealthresultsofa2yearprospectivecohortstudy AT reiningaingehf theeffectsofpelvicringinjuriesonqualityoflifephysicalandmentalhealthresultsofa2yearprospectivecohortstudy AT ijpmafrankfa theeffectsofpelvicringinjuriesonqualityoflifephysicalandmentalhealthresultsofa2yearprospectivecohortstudy AT banierinkhester effectsofpelvicringinjuriesonqualityoflifephysicalandmentalhealthresultsofa2yearprospectivecohortstudy AT tenduiskaj effectsofpelvicringinjuriesonqualityoflifephysicalandmentalhealthresultsofa2yearprospectivecohortstudy AT meestersanneml effectsofpelvicringinjuriesonqualityoflifephysicalandmentalhealthresultsofa2yearprospectivecohortstudy AT trouwborstnymkem effectsofpelvicringinjuriesonqualityoflifephysicalandmentalhealthresultsofa2yearprospectivecohortstudy AT heinemanerik effectsofpelvicringinjuriesonqualityoflifephysicalandmentalhealthresultsofa2yearprospectivecohortstudy AT wendtklausw effectsofpelvicringinjuriesonqualityoflifephysicalandmentalhealthresultsofa2yearprospectivecohortstudy AT ploegmakersjorisjw effectsofpelvicringinjuriesonqualityoflifephysicalandmentalhealthresultsofa2yearprospectivecohortstudy AT reiningaingehf effectsofpelvicringinjuriesonqualityoflifephysicalandmentalhealthresultsofa2yearprospectivecohortstudy AT ijpmafrankfa effectsofpelvicringinjuriesonqualityoflifephysicalandmentalhealthresultsofa2yearprospectivecohortstudy |