Cargando…

The incidence and risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheters in hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) can be fatal if not treated promptly, and individual studies have reported wide variability in rates of VTE associated with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC). We thus conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the overall incidence and risk of d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Puri, Anju, Dai, Haiyun, Giri, Mohan, Wu, Chengfei, Huang, Huanhuan, Zhao, Qinghua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9360324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35958406
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.917572
_version_ 1784764303903031296
author Puri, Anju
Dai, Haiyun
Giri, Mohan
Wu, Chengfei
Huang, Huanhuan
Zhao, Qinghua
author_facet Puri, Anju
Dai, Haiyun
Giri, Mohan
Wu, Chengfei
Huang, Huanhuan
Zhao, Qinghua
author_sort Puri, Anju
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) can be fatal if not treated promptly, and individual studies have reported wide variability in rates of VTE associated with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC). We thus conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the overall incidence and risk of developing PICC-related VTE in hospitalized patients. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception until January 26, 2022. In studies with a non-comparison arm, the pooled incidence of PICC-related VTE was calculated. The pooled odds ratio (OR) was calculated to assess the risk of VTE in the studies that compared PICC to the central venous catheter (CVC). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess methodological quality. RESULTS: A total of 75 articles (58 without a comparison arm and 17 with), including 109292 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled incidence of symptomatic VTE was 3.7% (95% CI: 3.1–4.4) in non-comparative studies. In the subgroup meta-analysis, the incidence of VTE was highest in patients who were in a critical care setting (10.6%; 95% CI: 5.0–17.7). Meta-analysis of comparative studies revealed that PICC was associated with a statistically significant increase in the odds of VTE events compared with CVC (OR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.83–3.37; P < 0.01). However, in subgroup analysis stratified by the study design, there was no significant difference in VTE events between the PICC and CVC in randomized controlled trials (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 0.77–6.74; P = 0.13). CONCLUSION: Best practice standards such as PICC tip verification and VTE prophylaxis can help reduce the incidence and risk of PICC-related VTE. The risk-benefit of inserting PICC should be carefully weighed, especially in critically ill patients. Cautious interpretation of our results is important owing to substantial heterogeneity among the studies included in this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9360324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93603242022-08-10 The incidence and risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheters in hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis Puri, Anju Dai, Haiyun Giri, Mohan Wu, Chengfei Huang, Huanhuan Zhao, Qinghua Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) can be fatal if not treated promptly, and individual studies have reported wide variability in rates of VTE associated with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC). We thus conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the overall incidence and risk of developing PICC-related VTE in hospitalized patients. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception until January 26, 2022. In studies with a non-comparison arm, the pooled incidence of PICC-related VTE was calculated. The pooled odds ratio (OR) was calculated to assess the risk of VTE in the studies that compared PICC to the central venous catheter (CVC). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess methodological quality. RESULTS: A total of 75 articles (58 without a comparison arm and 17 with), including 109292 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled incidence of symptomatic VTE was 3.7% (95% CI: 3.1–4.4) in non-comparative studies. In the subgroup meta-analysis, the incidence of VTE was highest in patients who were in a critical care setting (10.6%; 95% CI: 5.0–17.7). Meta-analysis of comparative studies revealed that PICC was associated with a statistically significant increase in the odds of VTE events compared with CVC (OR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.83–3.37; P < 0.01). However, in subgroup analysis stratified by the study design, there was no significant difference in VTE events between the PICC and CVC in randomized controlled trials (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 0.77–6.74; P = 0.13). CONCLUSION: Best practice standards such as PICC tip verification and VTE prophylaxis can help reduce the incidence and risk of PICC-related VTE. The risk-benefit of inserting PICC should be carefully weighed, especially in critically ill patients. Cautious interpretation of our results is important owing to substantial heterogeneity among the studies included in this study. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9360324/ /pubmed/35958406 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.917572 Text en Copyright © 2022 Puri, Dai, Giri, Wu, Huang and Zhao. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Puri, Anju
Dai, Haiyun
Giri, Mohan
Wu, Chengfei
Huang, Huanhuan
Zhao, Qinghua
The incidence and risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheters in hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title The incidence and risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheters in hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The incidence and risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheters in hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The incidence and risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheters in hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The incidence and risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheters in hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The incidence and risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheters in hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort incidence and risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheters in hospitalized patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9360324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35958406
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.917572
work_keys_str_mv AT purianju theincidenceandriskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralvenouscathetersinhospitalizedpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT daihaiyun theincidenceandriskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralvenouscathetersinhospitalizedpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT girimohan theincidenceandriskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralvenouscathetersinhospitalizedpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wuchengfei theincidenceandriskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralvenouscathetersinhospitalizedpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huanghuanhuan theincidenceandriskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralvenouscathetersinhospitalizedpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaoqinghua theincidenceandriskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralvenouscathetersinhospitalizedpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT purianju incidenceandriskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralvenouscathetersinhospitalizedpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT daihaiyun incidenceandriskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralvenouscathetersinhospitalizedpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT girimohan incidenceandriskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralvenouscathetersinhospitalizedpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wuchengfei incidenceandriskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralvenouscathetersinhospitalizedpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huanghuanhuan incidenceandriskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralvenouscathetersinhospitalizedpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaoqinghua incidenceandriskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralvenouscathetersinhospitalizedpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis