Cargando…

Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Endophytic Renal Tumors: Comparison of Operative, Functional, and Oncological Outcomes by Propensity Score Matching Analysis

PURPOSE: The study aimed to compare operative, functional, and oncological outcomes between partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) for entophytic renal tumors (ERTs) by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. METHODS: A total of 228 patients with ERTs who underwent PN or RN between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiong, Situ, Jiang, Ming, Jiang, Yi, Hu, Bing, Chen, Ru, Yao, Zhijun, Deng, Wen, Wan, Xianwen, Liu, Xiaoqiang, Chen, Luyao, Fu, Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9360524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35957884
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.916018
_version_ 1784764339117359104
author Xiong, Situ
Jiang, Ming
Jiang, Yi
Hu, Bing
Chen, Ru
Yao, Zhijun
Deng, Wen
Wan, Xianwen
Liu, Xiaoqiang
Chen, Luyao
Fu, Bin
author_facet Xiong, Situ
Jiang, Ming
Jiang, Yi
Hu, Bing
Chen, Ru
Yao, Zhijun
Deng, Wen
Wan, Xianwen
Liu, Xiaoqiang
Chen, Luyao
Fu, Bin
author_sort Xiong, Situ
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The study aimed to compare operative, functional, and oncological outcomes between partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) for entophytic renal tumors (ERTs) by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. METHODS: A total of 228 patients with ERTs who underwent PN or RN between August 2014 and December 2021 were assessed. A PSM in a 1:1 ratio was conducted to balance the differences between groups. Perioperative characteristics, renal functional, and oncological outcomes were compared between groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were used to determine the predictors of functional and survival outcomes. RESULTS: After PSM, 136 cases were matched to the PN group (n = 68) and the RN group (n = 68). Patients who underwent RN had shorter OT, less EBL, and lower high-grade complications (all p <0.05) relative to those who underwent PN. However, better perseveration of renal function was observed in the PN group, which was reflected in 48-h postoperative AKI (44.1% vs. 70.6%, p = 0.002), 1-year postoperative 90% eGFR preservation (45.6% vs. 22.1%, p = 0.004), and new-onset CKD Stage ≥III at last follow-up (2.9% vs. 29.4%, p <0.001). RN was the independent factor of short-term (OR, 2.812; 95% CI, 1.369–5.778; p = 0.005) and long-term renal function decline (OR, 10.242; 95% CI, 2.175–48.240; p = 0.003). Furthermore, PN resulted in a better OS and similar PFS and CSS as compared to RN (p = 0.042, 0.15, and 0.21, respectively). RN (OR, 7.361; 95% CI, 1.143–47.423; p = 0.036) and pT3 stage (OR, 4.241; 95% CI, 1.079–16.664; p = 0.039) were independent predictors of overall mortality. CONCLUSION: Among patients with ERTs, although the PN group showed a higher incidence of high-grade complications than RN, when technically feasible and with experienced surgeons, PN is recommended for better preservation of renal function, longer OS, and similar oncological outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9360524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93605242022-08-10 Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Endophytic Renal Tumors: Comparison of Operative, Functional, and Oncological Outcomes by Propensity Score Matching Analysis Xiong, Situ Jiang, Ming Jiang, Yi Hu, Bing Chen, Ru Yao, Zhijun Deng, Wen Wan, Xianwen Liu, Xiaoqiang Chen, Luyao Fu, Bin Front Oncol Oncology PURPOSE: The study aimed to compare operative, functional, and oncological outcomes between partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) for entophytic renal tumors (ERTs) by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. METHODS: A total of 228 patients with ERTs who underwent PN or RN between August 2014 and December 2021 were assessed. A PSM in a 1:1 ratio was conducted to balance the differences between groups. Perioperative characteristics, renal functional, and oncological outcomes were compared between groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were used to determine the predictors of functional and survival outcomes. RESULTS: After PSM, 136 cases were matched to the PN group (n = 68) and the RN group (n = 68). Patients who underwent RN had shorter OT, less EBL, and lower high-grade complications (all p <0.05) relative to those who underwent PN. However, better perseveration of renal function was observed in the PN group, which was reflected in 48-h postoperative AKI (44.1% vs. 70.6%, p = 0.002), 1-year postoperative 90% eGFR preservation (45.6% vs. 22.1%, p = 0.004), and new-onset CKD Stage ≥III at last follow-up (2.9% vs. 29.4%, p <0.001). RN was the independent factor of short-term (OR, 2.812; 95% CI, 1.369–5.778; p = 0.005) and long-term renal function decline (OR, 10.242; 95% CI, 2.175–48.240; p = 0.003). Furthermore, PN resulted in a better OS and similar PFS and CSS as compared to RN (p = 0.042, 0.15, and 0.21, respectively). RN (OR, 7.361; 95% CI, 1.143–47.423; p = 0.036) and pT3 stage (OR, 4.241; 95% CI, 1.079–16.664; p = 0.039) were independent predictors of overall mortality. CONCLUSION: Among patients with ERTs, although the PN group showed a higher incidence of high-grade complications than RN, when technically feasible and with experienced surgeons, PN is recommended for better preservation of renal function, longer OS, and similar oncological outcomes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9360524/ /pubmed/35957884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.916018 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xiong, Jiang, Jiang, Hu, Chen, Yao, Deng, Wan, Liu, Chen and Fu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Xiong, Situ
Jiang, Ming
Jiang, Yi
Hu, Bing
Chen, Ru
Yao, Zhijun
Deng, Wen
Wan, Xianwen
Liu, Xiaoqiang
Chen, Luyao
Fu, Bin
Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Endophytic Renal Tumors: Comparison of Operative, Functional, and Oncological Outcomes by Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Endophytic Renal Tumors: Comparison of Operative, Functional, and Oncological Outcomes by Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title_full Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Endophytic Renal Tumors: Comparison of Operative, Functional, and Oncological Outcomes by Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title_fullStr Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Endophytic Renal Tumors: Comparison of Operative, Functional, and Oncological Outcomes by Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Endophytic Renal Tumors: Comparison of Operative, Functional, and Oncological Outcomes by Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title_short Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Endophytic Renal Tumors: Comparison of Operative, Functional, and Oncological Outcomes by Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title_sort partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for endophytic renal tumors: comparison of operative, functional, and oncological outcomes by propensity score matching analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9360524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35957884
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.916018
work_keys_str_mv AT xiongsitu partialnephrectomyversusradicalnephrectomyforendophyticrenaltumorscomparisonofoperativefunctionalandoncologicaloutcomesbypropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT jiangming partialnephrectomyversusradicalnephrectomyforendophyticrenaltumorscomparisonofoperativefunctionalandoncologicaloutcomesbypropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT jiangyi partialnephrectomyversusradicalnephrectomyforendophyticrenaltumorscomparisonofoperativefunctionalandoncologicaloutcomesbypropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT hubing partialnephrectomyversusradicalnephrectomyforendophyticrenaltumorscomparisonofoperativefunctionalandoncologicaloutcomesbypropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT chenru partialnephrectomyversusradicalnephrectomyforendophyticrenaltumorscomparisonofoperativefunctionalandoncologicaloutcomesbypropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT yaozhijun partialnephrectomyversusradicalnephrectomyforendophyticrenaltumorscomparisonofoperativefunctionalandoncologicaloutcomesbypropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT dengwen partialnephrectomyversusradicalnephrectomyforendophyticrenaltumorscomparisonofoperativefunctionalandoncologicaloutcomesbypropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT wanxianwen partialnephrectomyversusradicalnephrectomyforendophyticrenaltumorscomparisonofoperativefunctionalandoncologicaloutcomesbypropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT liuxiaoqiang partialnephrectomyversusradicalnephrectomyforendophyticrenaltumorscomparisonofoperativefunctionalandoncologicaloutcomesbypropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT chenluyao partialnephrectomyversusradicalnephrectomyforendophyticrenaltumorscomparisonofoperativefunctionalandoncologicaloutcomesbypropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT fubin partialnephrectomyversusradicalnephrectomyforendophyticrenaltumorscomparisonofoperativefunctionalandoncologicaloutcomesbypropensityscorematchinganalysis