Cargando…

Motorless cadence control of standard and low duty cycle-patterned neural stimulation intensity extends muscle-driven cycling output after paralysis

BACKGROUND: Stimulation-driven exercise is often limited by rapid fatigue of the activated muscles. Selective neural stimulation patterns that decrease activated fiber overlap and/or duty cycle improve cycling exercise duration and intensity. However, unequal outputs from independently activated fib...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gelenitis, Kristen, Foglyano, Kevin, Lombardo, Lisa, McDaniel, John, Triolo, Ronald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9360711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35945575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01064-w
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Stimulation-driven exercise is often limited by rapid fatigue of the activated muscles. Selective neural stimulation patterns that decrease activated fiber overlap and/or duty cycle improve cycling exercise duration and intensity. However, unequal outputs from independently activated fiber populations may cause large discrepancies in power production and crank angle velocity among pedal revolutions. Enforcing a constant cadence through feedback control of stimulus levels may address this issue and further improve endurance by targeting a submaximal but higher than steady-state exercise intensity. METHODS: Seven participants with paralysis cycled using standard cadence-controlled stimulation (S-Cont). Four of those participants also cycled with a low duty cycle (carousel) cadence-controlled stimulation scheme (C-Cont). S-Cont and C-Cont patterns were compared with conventional maximal stimulation (S-Max). Outcome measures include total work (W), end power (P(end)), power fluctuation (PFI), charge accumulation (Q) and efficiency (η). Physiological measurements of muscle oxygenation (SmO(2)) and heart rate were also collected with select participants. RESULTS: At least one cadence-controlled stimulation pattern (S-Cont or C-Cont) improved P(end) over S-Max in all participants and increased W in three participants. Both controlled patterns increased Q and η and reduced PFI compared with S-Max and prior open-loop studies. S-Cont stimulation also delayed declines in SmO2 and increased heart rate in one participant compared with S-Max. CONCLUSIONS: Cadence-controlled selective stimulation improves cycling endurance and increases efficiency over conventional stimulation by incorporating fiber groups only as needed to maintain a desired exercise intensity. Closed-loop carousel stimulation also successfully reduces power fluctuations relative to previous open-loop efforts, which will enable neuroprosthesis recipients to better take advantage of duty cycle reducing patterns.