Cargando…

Motorless cadence control of standard and low duty cycle-patterned neural stimulation intensity extends muscle-driven cycling output after paralysis

BACKGROUND: Stimulation-driven exercise is often limited by rapid fatigue of the activated muscles. Selective neural stimulation patterns that decrease activated fiber overlap and/or duty cycle improve cycling exercise duration and intensity. However, unequal outputs from independently activated fib...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gelenitis, Kristen, Foglyano, Kevin, Lombardo, Lisa, McDaniel, John, Triolo, Ronald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9360711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35945575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01064-w
_version_ 1784764383006556160
author Gelenitis, Kristen
Foglyano, Kevin
Lombardo, Lisa
McDaniel, John
Triolo, Ronald
author_facet Gelenitis, Kristen
Foglyano, Kevin
Lombardo, Lisa
McDaniel, John
Triolo, Ronald
author_sort Gelenitis, Kristen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stimulation-driven exercise is often limited by rapid fatigue of the activated muscles. Selective neural stimulation patterns that decrease activated fiber overlap and/or duty cycle improve cycling exercise duration and intensity. However, unequal outputs from independently activated fiber populations may cause large discrepancies in power production and crank angle velocity among pedal revolutions. Enforcing a constant cadence through feedback control of stimulus levels may address this issue and further improve endurance by targeting a submaximal but higher than steady-state exercise intensity. METHODS: Seven participants with paralysis cycled using standard cadence-controlled stimulation (S-Cont). Four of those participants also cycled with a low duty cycle (carousel) cadence-controlled stimulation scheme (C-Cont). S-Cont and C-Cont patterns were compared with conventional maximal stimulation (S-Max). Outcome measures include total work (W), end power (P(end)), power fluctuation (PFI), charge accumulation (Q) and efficiency (η). Physiological measurements of muscle oxygenation (SmO(2)) and heart rate were also collected with select participants. RESULTS: At least one cadence-controlled stimulation pattern (S-Cont or C-Cont) improved P(end) over S-Max in all participants and increased W in three participants. Both controlled patterns increased Q and η and reduced PFI compared with S-Max and prior open-loop studies. S-Cont stimulation also delayed declines in SmO2 and increased heart rate in one participant compared with S-Max. CONCLUSIONS: Cadence-controlled selective stimulation improves cycling endurance and increases efficiency over conventional stimulation by incorporating fiber groups only as needed to maintain a desired exercise intensity. Closed-loop carousel stimulation also successfully reduces power fluctuations relative to previous open-loop efforts, which will enable neuroprosthesis recipients to better take advantage of duty cycle reducing patterns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9360711
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93607112022-08-09 Motorless cadence control of standard and low duty cycle-patterned neural stimulation intensity extends muscle-driven cycling output after paralysis Gelenitis, Kristen Foglyano, Kevin Lombardo, Lisa McDaniel, John Triolo, Ronald J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Stimulation-driven exercise is often limited by rapid fatigue of the activated muscles. Selective neural stimulation patterns that decrease activated fiber overlap and/or duty cycle improve cycling exercise duration and intensity. However, unequal outputs from independently activated fiber populations may cause large discrepancies in power production and crank angle velocity among pedal revolutions. Enforcing a constant cadence through feedback control of stimulus levels may address this issue and further improve endurance by targeting a submaximal but higher than steady-state exercise intensity. METHODS: Seven participants with paralysis cycled using standard cadence-controlled stimulation (S-Cont). Four of those participants also cycled with a low duty cycle (carousel) cadence-controlled stimulation scheme (C-Cont). S-Cont and C-Cont patterns were compared with conventional maximal stimulation (S-Max). Outcome measures include total work (W), end power (P(end)), power fluctuation (PFI), charge accumulation (Q) and efficiency (η). Physiological measurements of muscle oxygenation (SmO(2)) and heart rate were also collected with select participants. RESULTS: At least one cadence-controlled stimulation pattern (S-Cont or C-Cont) improved P(end) over S-Max in all participants and increased W in three participants. Both controlled patterns increased Q and η and reduced PFI compared with S-Max and prior open-loop studies. S-Cont stimulation also delayed declines in SmO2 and increased heart rate in one participant compared with S-Max. CONCLUSIONS: Cadence-controlled selective stimulation improves cycling endurance and increases efficiency over conventional stimulation by incorporating fiber groups only as needed to maintain a desired exercise intensity. Closed-loop carousel stimulation also successfully reduces power fluctuations relative to previous open-loop efforts, which will enable neuroprosthesis recipients to better take advantage of duty cycle reducing patterns. BioMed Central 2022-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9360711/ /pubmed/35945575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01064-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Gelenitis, Kristen
Foglyano, Kevin
Lombardo, Lisa
McDaniel, John
Triolo, Ronald
Motorless cadence control of standard and low duty cycle-patterned neural stimulation intensity extends muscle-driven cycling output after paralysis
title Motorless cadence control of standard and low duty cycle-patterned neural stimulation intensity extends muscle-driven cycling output after paralysis
title_full Motorless cadence control of standard and low duty cycle-patterned neural stimulation intensity extends muscle-driven cycling output after paralysis
title_fullStr Motorless cadence control of standard and low duty cycle-patterned neural stimulation intensity extends muscle-driven cycling output after paralysis
title_full_unstemmed Motorless cadence control of standard and low duty cycle-patterned neural stimulation intensity extends muscle-driven cycling output after paralysis
title_short Motorless cadence control of standard and low duty cycle-patterned neural stimulation intensity extends muscle-driven cycling output after paralysis
title_sort motorless cadence control of standard and low duty cycle-patterned neural stimulation intensity extends muscle-driven cycling output after paralysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9360711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35945575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01064-w
work_keys_str_mv AT gelenitiskristen motorlesscadencecontrolofstandardandlowdutycyclepatternedneuralstimulationintensityextendsmuscledrivencyclingoutputafterparalysis
AT foglyanokevin motorlesscadencecontrolofstandardandlowdutycyclepatternedneuralstimulationintensityextendsmuscledrivencyclingoutputafterparalysis
AT lombardolisa motorlesscadencecontrolofstandardandlowdutycyclepatternedneuralstimulationintensityextendsmuscledrivencyclingoutputafterparalysis
AT mcdanieljohn motorlesscadencecontrolofstandardandlowdutycyclepatternedneuralstimulationintensityextendsmuscledrivencyclingoutputafterparalysis
AT trioloronald motorlesscadencecontrolofstandardandlowdutycyclepatternedneuralstimulationintensityextendsmuscledrivencyclingoutputafterparalysis