Cargando…

Health care provider's experience and perspective of cervical cancer screening in Singapore: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND: In Singapore, the current cervical cancer screening (CCS) coverage rate of 48% falls below the national target of 70%. Health care providers (HCPs) play a critical role in promoting CCS uptake. However, there is limited understanding of the perspectives of HCPs regarding CCS. Hence, we a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chua, Brandon Wen Bing, Neo, Pearlyn, Ma, Viva Yan, Lim, Li Min, Ng, Joseph Soon Yau, Wee, Hwee Lin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9360748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35958842
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.853453
_version_ 1784764391857586176
author Chua, Brandon Wen Bing
Neo, Pearlyn
Ma, Viva Yan
Lim, Li Min
Ng, Joseph Soon Yau
Wee, Hwee Lin
author_facet Chua, Brandon Wen Bing
Neo, Pearlyn
Ma, Viva Yan
Lim, Li Min
Ng, Joseph Soon Yau
Wee, Hwee Lin
author_sort Chua, Brandon Wen Bing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In Singapore, the current cervical cancer screening (CCS) coverage rate of 48% falls below the national target of 70%. Health care providers (HCPs) play a critical role in promoting CCS uptake. However, there is limited understanding of the perspectives of HCPs regarding CCS. Hence, we aimed to understand the challenges encountered by HCPs delivering CCS in different care settings in the Singapore health system. We also aimed to explore perspectives on newer features of CCS such as self-sampling and HPV genotyping. METHODS: Physicians, nurses, program administrators and laboratory technicians involved with CCS were invited for a one-on-one semi-structured interview conducted over Zoom between May to August 2021. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Eighteen HCPs from 12 institutions were interviewed. Most participants were women (61.1%) and worked in public health institutions (72.2%). For factors influencing CCS, nine key themes were identified and organized into four categories: (1) patient factors, (2) HCP factors, (3) health system factors and (4) health promotion factors. Key themes commonly highlighted by study participants were related to patients' preferences and acceptance for screening, the processes of delivering CCS, the national priority for cervical cancer and the effectiveness of existing health promotion efforts. Five key themes were identified for CCS innovations. Self-sampling was viewed favorably to increase CCS uptake, while primary HPV screening with HPV partial genotyping had higher sensitivities to detect pre-cancers and cancers compared to cytology. Extended HPV genotyping beyond HPV16/18 could play an important role in CCS with increasing HPV vaccination coverage, as well as in the management of persistent HPV infection. CONCLUSION: In Singapore, HCPs face multiple challenges for CCS in practice. Insights from this study are directly relevant to, and useful for developing policies around national CCS programs and treatment guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9360748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93607482022-08-10 Health care provider's experience and perspective of cervical cancer screening in Singapore: A qualitative study Chua, Brandon Wen Bing Neo, Pearlyn Ma, Viva Yan Lim, Li Min Ng, Joseph Soon Yau Wee, Hwee Lin Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: In Singapore, the current cervical cancer screening (CCS) coverage rate of 48% falls below the national target of 70%. Health care providers (HCPs) play a critical role in promoting CCS uptake. However, there is limited understanding of the perspectives of HCPs regarding CCS. Hence, we aimed to understand the challenges encountered by HCPs delivering CCS in different care settings in the Singapore health system. We also aimed to explore perspectives on newer features of CCS such as self-sampling and HPV genotyping. METHODS: Physicians, nurses, program administrators and laboratory technicians involved with CCS were invited for a one-on-one semi-structured interview conducted over Zoom between May to August 2021. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Eighteen HCPs from 12 institutions were interviewed. Most participants were women (61.1%) and worked in public health institutions (72.2%). For factors influencing CCS, nine key themes were identified and organized into four categories: (1) patient factors, (2) HCP factors, (3) health system factors and (4) health promotion factors. Key themes commonly highlighted by study participants were related to patients' preferences and acceptance for screening, the processes of delivering CCS, the national priority for cervical cancer and the effectiveness of existing health promotion efforts. Five key themes were identified for CCS innovations. Self-sampling was viewed favorably to increase CCS uptake, while primary HPV screening with HPV partial genotyping had higher sensitivities to detect pre-cancers and cancers compared to cytology. Extended HPV genotyping beyond HPV16/18 could play an important role in CCS with increasing HPV vaccination coverage, as well as in the management of persistent HPV infection. CONCLUSION: In Singapore, HCPs face multiple challenges for CCS in practice. Insights from this study are directly relevant to, and useful for developing policies around national CCS programs and treatment guidelines. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9360748/ /pubmed/35958842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.853453 Text en Copyright © 2022 Chua, Neo, Ma, Lim, Ng and Wee. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Chua, Brandon Wen Bing
Neo, Pearlyn
Ma, Viva Yan
Lim, Li Min
Ng, Joseph Soon Yau
Wee, Hwee Lin
Health care provider's experience and perspective of cervical cancer screening in Singapore: A qualitative study
title Health care provider's experience and perspective of cervical cancer screening in Singapore: A qualitative study
title_full Health care provider's experience and perspective of cervical cancer screening in Singapore: A qualitative study
title_fullStr Health care provider's experience and perspective of cervical cancer screening in Singapore: A qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Health care provider's experience and perspective of cervical cancer screening in Singapore: A qualitative study
title_short Health care provider's experience and perspective of cervical cancer screening in Singapore: A qualitative study
title_sort health care provider's experience and perspective of cervical cancer screening in singapore: a qualitative study
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9360748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35958842
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.853453
work_keys_str_mv AT chuabrandonwenbing healthcareprovidersexperienceandperspectiveofcervicalcancerscreeninginsingaporeaqualitativestudy
AT neopearlyn healthcareprovidersexperienceandperspectiveofcervicalcancerscreeninginsingaporeaqualitativestudy
AT mavivayan healthcareprovidersexperienceandperspectiveofcervicalcancerscreeninginsingaporeaqualitativestudy
AT limlimin healthcareprovidersexperienceandperspectiveofcervicalcancerscreeninginsingaporeaqualitativestudy
AT ngjosephsoonyau healthcareprovidersexperienceandperspectiveofcervicalcancerscreeninginsingaporeaqualitativestudy
AT weehweelin healthcareprovidersexperienceandperspectiveofcervicalcancerscreeninginsingaporeaqualitativestudy