Cargando…

Correspondence between practitioners’ self-assessment and independent motivational interviewing treatment integrity ratings

As evaluation of practitioners’ competence is largely based on self-report, accuracy in practitioners’ self-assessment is essential for ensuring high quality treatment-delivery. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between independent observers’ ratings and practitioners’ self-report...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beckman, Maria, Lindqvist, Helena, Öhman, Lina, Forsberg, Lars, Lundgren, Tobias, Ghaderi, Ata
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9360749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35959019
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.890579
_version_ 1784764392097710080
author Beckman, Maria
Lindqvist, Helena
Öhman, Lina
Forsberg, Lars
Lundgren, Tobias
Ghaderi, Ata
author_facet Beckman, Maria
Lindqvist, Helena
Öhman, Lina
Forsberg, Lars
Lundgren, Tobias
Ghaderi, Ata
author_sort Beckman, Maria
collection PubMed
description As evaluation of practitioners’ competence is largely based on self-report, accuracy in practitioners’ self-assessment is essential for ensuring high quality treatment-delivery. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between independent observers’ ratings and practitioners’ self-reported treatment integrity ratings of Motivational interviewing (MI). Practitioners (N = 134) were randomized to two types of supervision [i.e., regular institutional group supervision, or individual telephone supervision based on the MI Treatment Integrity (MITI) code]. The mean age was 43.2 years (SD = 10.2), and 62.7 percent were females. All sessions were recorded and evaluated with the MITI, and the MI skills were self-assessed with a questionnaire over a period of 12 months. The associations between self-reported and objectively assessed MI skills were overall weak, but increased slightly from baseline to the 12-months assessment. However, the self-ratings from the group that received monthly objective feedback were not more accurate than those participating in regular group supervision. These results expand findings from previous studies and have important implications for assessment of practitioners’ treatment fidelity: Practitioners may learn to improve the accuracy of self-assessment of competence, but to ensure that patients receive intended care, adherence and competence should be assessed objectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9360749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93607492022-08-10 Correspondence between practitioners’ self-assessment and independent motivational interviewing treatment integrity ratings Beckman, Maria Lindqvist, Helena Öhman, Lina Forsberg, Lars Lundgren, Tobias Ghaderi, Ata Front Psychol Psychology As evaluation of practitioners’ competence is largely based on self-report, accuracy in practitioners’ self-assessment is essential for ensuring high quality treatment-delivery. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between independent observers’ ratings and practitioners’ self-reported treatment integrity ratings of Motivational interviewing (MI). Practitioners (N = 134) were randomized to two types of supervision [i.e., regular institutional group supervision, or individual telephone supervision based on the MI Treatment Integrity (MITI) code]. The mean age was 43.2 years (SD = 10.2), and 62.7 percent were females. All sessions were recorded and evaluated with the MITI, and the MI skills were self-assessed with a questionnaire over a period of 12 months. The associations between self-reported and objectively assessed MI skills were overall weak, but increased slightly from baseline to the 12-months assessment. However, the self-ratings from the group that received monthly objective feedback were not more accurate than those participating in regular group supervision. These results expand findings from previous studies and have important implications for assessment of practitioners’ treatment fidelity: Practitioners may learn to improve the accuracy of self-assessment of competence, but to ensure that patients receive intended care, adherence and competence should be assessed objectively. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9360749/ /pubmed/35959019 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.890579 Text en Copyright © 2022 Beckman, Lindqvist, Öhman, Forsberg, Lundgren and Ghaderi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Beckman, Maria
Lindqvist, Helena
Öhman, Lina
Forsberg, Lars
Lundgren, Tobias
Ghaderi, Ata
Correspondence between practitioners’ self-assessment and independent motivational interviewing treatment integrity ratings
title Correspondence between practitioners’ self-assessment and independent motivational interviewing treatment integrity ratings
title_full Correspondence between practitioners’ self-assessment and independent motivational interviewing treatment integrity ratings
title_fullStr Correspondence between practitioners’ self-assessment and independent motivational interviewing treatment integrity ratings
title_full_unstemmed Correspondence between practitioners’ self-assessment and independent motivational interviewing treatment integrity ratings
title_short Correspondence between practitioners’ self-assessment and independent motivational interviewing treatment integrity ratings
title_sort correspondence between practitioners’ self-assessment and independent motivational interviewing treatment integrity ratings
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9360749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35959019
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.890579
work_keys_str_mv AT beckmanmaria correspondencebetweenpractitionersselfassessmentandindependentmotivationalinterviewingtreatmentintegrityratings
AT lindqvisthelena correspondencebetweenpractitionersselfassessmentandindependentmotivationalinterviewingtreatmentintegrityratings
AT ohmanlina correspondencebetweenpractitionersselfassessmentandindependentmotivationalinterviewingtreatmentintegrityratings
AT forsberglars correspondencebetweenpractitionersselfassessmentandindependentmotivationalinterviewingtreatmentintegrityratings
AT lundgrentobias correspondencebetweenpractitionersselfassessmentandindependentmotivationalinterviewingtreatmentintegrityratings
AT ghaderiata correspondencebetweenpractitionersselfassessmentandindependentmotivationalinterviewingtreatmentintegrityratings