Cargando…
Correspondence between practitioners’ self-assessment and independent motivational interviewing treatment integrity ratings
As evaluation of practitioners’ competence is largely based on self-report, accuracy in practitioners’ self-assessment is essential for ensuring high quality treatment-delivery. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between independent observers’ ratings and practitioners’ self-report...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9360749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35959019 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.890579 |
_version_ | 1784764392097710080 |
---|---|
author | Beckman, Maria Lindqvist, Helena Öhman, Lina Forsberg, Lars Lundgren, Tobias Ghaderi, Ata |
author_facet | Beckman, Maria Lindqvist, Helena Öhman, Lina Forsberg, Lars Lundgren, Tobias Ghaderi, Ata |
author_sort | Beckman, Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | As evaluation of practitioners’ competence is largely based on self-report, accuracy in practitioners’ self-assessment is essential for ensuring high quality treatment-delivery. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between independent observers’ ratings and practitioners’ self-reported treatment integrity ratings of Motivational interviewing (MI). Practitioners (N = 134) were randomized to two types of supervision [i.e., regular institutional group supervision, or individual telephone supervision based on the MI Treatment Integrity (MITI) code]. The mean age was 43.2 years (SD = 10.2), and 62.7 percent were females. All sessions were recorded and evaluated with the MITI, and the MI skills were self-assessed with a questionnaire over a period of 12 months. The associations between self-reported and objectively assessed MI skills were overall weak, but increased slightly from baseline to the 12-months assessment. However, the self-ratings from the group that received monthly objective feedback were not more accurate than those participating in regular group supervision. These results expand findings from previous studies and have important implications for assessment of practitioners’ treatment fidelity: Practitioners may learn to improve the accuracy of self-assessment of competence, but to ensure that patients receive intended care, adherence and competence should be assessed objectively. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9360749 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93607492022-08-10 Correspondence between practitioners’ self-assessment and independent motivational interviewing treatment integrity ratings Beckman, Maria Lindqvist, Helena Öhman, Lina Forsberg, Lars Lundgren, Tobias Ghaderi, Ata Front Psychol Psychology As evaluation of practitioners’ competence is largely based on self-report, accuracy in practitioners’ self-assessment is essential for ensuring high quality treatment-delivery. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between independent observers’ ratings and practitioners’ self-reported treatment integrity ratings of Motivational interviewing (MI). Practitioners (N = 134) were randomized to two types of supervision [i.e., regular institutional group supervision, or individual telephone supervision based on the MI Treatment Integrity (MITI) code]. The mean age was 43.2 years (SD = 10.2), and 62.7 percent were females. All sessions were recorded and evaluated with the MITI, and the MI skills were self-assessed with a questionnaire over a period of 12 months. The associations between self-reported and objectively assessed MI skills were overall weak, but increased slightly from baseline to the 12-months assessment. However, the self-ratings from the group that received monthly objective feedback were not more accurate than those participating in regular group supervision. These results expand findings from previous studies and have important implications for assessment of practitioners’ treatment fidelity: Practitioners may learn to improve the accuracy of self-assessment of competence, but to ensure that patients receive intended care, adherence and competence should be assessed objectively. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9360749/ /pubmed/35959019 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.890579 Text en Copyright © 2022 Beckman, Lindqvist, Öhman, Forsberg, Lundgren and Ghaderi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Beckman, Maria Lindqvist, Helena Öhman, Lina Forsberg, Lars Lundgren, Tobias Ghaderi, Ata Correspondence between practitioners’ self-assessment and independent motivational interviewing treatment integrity ratings |
title | Correspondence between practitioners’ self-assessment and independent motivational interviewing treatment integrity ratings |
title_full | Correspondence between practitioners’ self-assessment and independent motivational interviewing treatment integrity ratings |
title_fullStr | Correspondence between practitioners’ self-assessment and independent motivational interviewing treatment integrity ratings |
title_full_unstemmed | Correspondence between practitioners’ self-assessment and independent motivational interviewing treatment integrity ratings |
title_short | Correspondence between practitioners’ self-assessment and independent motivational interviewing treatment integrity ratings |
title_sort | correspondence between practitioners’ self-assessment and independent motivational interviewing treatment integrity ratings |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9360749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35959019 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.890579 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beckmanmaria correspondencebetweenpractitionersselfassessmentandindependentmotivationalinterviewingtreatmentintegrityratings AT lindqvisthelena correspondencebetweenpractitionersselfassessmentandindependentmotivationalinterviewingtreatmentintegrityratings AT ohmanlina correspondencebetweenpractitionersselfassessmentandindependentmotivationalinterviewingtreatmentintegrityratings AT forsberglars correspondencebetweenpractitionersselfassessmentandindependentmotivationalinterviewingtreatmentintegrityratings AT lundgrentobias correspondencebetweenpractitionersselfassessmentandindependentmotivationalinterviewingtreatmentintegrityratings AT ghaderiata correspondencebetweenpractitionersselfassessmentandindependentmotivationalinterviewingtreatmentintegrityratings |