Cargando…

Comparison between Single Versus Twice Application of Topical 85% Trichloroacetic Acid in the Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia; A Randomized Clinical Trial on Efficacy and Tolerability

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of up to two-time administration of 85% TCA, as a promising alternative therapy to conservative and surgical management of grade one to three CINs. METHODS: In this two-armed randomized clinical trial, a total of 53 patients with biopsy-proven CIN lesions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ayatollahi, Haleh, Ershadimoghaddam, Solmaz, Naji, Siamak, Yekta, Zahra, Jalali, Zahra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9360930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35345367
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.3.947
_version_ 1784764416899678208
author Ayatollahi, Haleh
Ershadimoghaddam, Solmaz
Naji, Siamak
Yekta, Zahra
Jalali, Zahra
author_facet Ayatollahi, Haleh
Ershadimoghaddam, Solmaz
Naji, Siamak
Yekta, Zahra
Jalali, Zahra
author_sort Ayatollahi, Haleh
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of up to two-time administration of 85% TCA, as a promising alternative therapy to conservative and surgical management of grade one to three CINs. METHODS: In this two-armed randomized clinical trial, a total of 53 patients with biopsy-proven CIN lesions were allocated to two groups of TCA treatment. The first group (n=26) received a single dose of local therapy with 85% TCA while the second group (n=27) was treated on two separate occasions with a two-week interval. Two participants (one in each group) were lost to follow-up. At the two-month follow-up after TCA application, a colposcopy-guided biopsy was performed for all patients and the pathological specimens were studied by a single experienced pathologist to determine the post-intervention grading of CIN. RESULTS: Two groups were comparable in terms of age and base-line lesion grading, as CIN 1 lesions comprised the majority of cases (54%), followed by CIN 2(37%). While our sample was a poor representative of CIN3 lesions (7%), no significant difference was noticed between the single and twice TCA treated groups with a response rate of 52% and 54% respectively (either complete remission to normal histology or regression to any low-grade lesion). Either separate analysis (with respect to the base-line grading within each treatment group) or combined analysis (regardless of CIN sub-group) could not generate any statistical significance. The second dose of TCA did not increase the frequency of reported adverse events. CONCLUSION: The second dose of topical 85% TCA does not seem to increase the CIN response rate more so than its single dose. However, further controlled clinical trials with larger samples are warranted to verify current findings. The use of TCA was not limited by any major side effect, therefore, the potential to achieve an increased efficacy with more frequent TCA applications is appealing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9360930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93609302022-08-10 Comparison between Single Versus Twice Application of Topical 85% Trichloroacetic Acid in the Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia; A Randomized Clinical Trial on Efficacy and Tolerability Ayatollahi, Haleh Ershadimoghaddam, Solmaz Naji, Siamak Yekta, Zahra Jalali, Zahra Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Research Article PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of up to two-time administration of 85% TCA, as a promising alternative therapy to conservative and surgical management of grade one to three CINs. METHODS: In this two-armed randomized clinical trial, a total of 53 patients with biopsy-proven CIN lesions were allocated to two groups of TCA treatment. The first group (n=26) received a single dose of local therapy with 85% TCA while the second group (n=27) was treated on two separate occasions with a two-week interval. Two participants (one in each group) were lost to follow-up. At the two-month follow-up after TCA application, a colposcopy-guided biopsy was performed for all patients and the pathological specimens were studied by a single experienced pathologist to determine the post-intervention grading of CIN. RESULTS: Two groups were comparable in terms of age and base-line lesion grading, as CIN 1 lesions comprised the majority of cases (54%), followed by CIN 2(37%). While our sample was a poor representative of CIN3 lesions (7%), no significant difference was noticed between the single and twice TCA treated groups with a response rate of 52% and 54% respectively (either complete remission to normal histology or regression to any low-grade lesion). Either separate analysis (with respect to the base-line grading within each treatment group) or combined analysis (regardless of CIN sub-group) could not generate any statistical significance. The second dose of TCA did not increase the frequency of reported adverse events. CONCLUSION: The second dose of topical 85% TCA does not seem to increase the CIN response rate more so than its single dose. However, further controlled clinical trials with larger samples are warranted to verify current findings. The use of TCA was not limited by any major side effect, therefore, the potential to achieve an increased efficacy with more frequent TCA applications is appealing. West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9360930/ /pubmed/35345367 http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.3.947 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Research Article
Ayatollahi, Haleh
Ershadimoghaddam, Solmaz
Naji, Siamak
Yekta, Zahra
Jalali, Zahra
Comparison between Single Versus Twice Application of Topical 85% Trichloroacetic Acid in the Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia; A Randomized Clinical Trial on Efficacy and Tolerability
title Comparison between Single Versus Twice Application of Topical 85% Trichloroacetic Acid in the Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia; A Randomized Clinical Trial on Efficacy and Tolerability
title_full Comparison between Single Versus Twice Application of Topical 85% Trichloroacetic Acid in the Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia; A Randomized Clinical Trial on Efficacy and Tolerability
title_fullStr Comparison between Single Versus Twice Application of Topical 85% Trichloroacetic Acid in the Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia; A Randomized Clinical Trial on Efficacy and Tolerability
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Single Versus Twice Application of Topical 85% Trichloroacetic Acid in the Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia; A Randomized Clinical Trial on Efficacy and Tolerability
title_short Comparison between Single Versus Twice Application of Topical 85% Trichloroacetic Acid in the Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia; A Randomized Clinical Trial on Efficacy and Tolerability
title_sort comparison between single versus twice application of topical 85% trichloroacetic acid in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; a randomized clinical trial on efficacy and tolerability
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9360930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35345367
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.3.947
work_keys_str_mv AT ayatollahihaleh comparisonbetweensingleversustwiceapplicationoftopical85trichloroaceticacidinthetreatmentofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiaarandomizedclinicaltrialonefficacyandtolerability
AT ershadimoghaddamsolmaz comparisonbetweensingleversustwiceapplicationoftopical85trichloroaceticacidinthetreatmentofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiaarandomizedclinicaltrialonefficacyandtolerability
AT najisiamak comparisonbetweensingleversustwiceapplicationoftopical85trichloroaceticacidinthetreatmentofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiaarandomizedclinicaltrialonefficacyandtolerability
AT yektazahra comparisonbetweensingleversustwiceapplicationoftopical85trichloroaceticacidinthetreatmentofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiaarandomizedclinicaltrialonefficacyandtolerability
AT jalalizahra comparisonbetweensingleversustwiceapplicationoftopical85trichloroaceticacidinthetreatmentofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiaarandomizedclinicaltrialonefficacyandtolerability