Cargando…

Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Brain Tumor Diagnosis and Classification Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging

IMPORTANCE: Deep learning may be able to use patient magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data to aid in brain tumor classification and diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To develop and clinically validate a deep learning system for automated identification and classification of 18 types of brain tumors from patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Peiyi, Shan, Wei, Guo, Yue, Wang, Yinyan, Sun, Rujing, Cai, Jinxiu, Li, Hao, Chan, Wei Sheng, Liu, Pan, Yi, Lei, Zhang, Shaosen, Li, Weihua, Jiang, Tao, He, Kunlun, Wu, Zhenzhou
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9361083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35939301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.25608
_version_ 1784764454759563264
author Gao, Peiyi
Shan, Wei
Guo, Yue
Wang, Yinyan
Sun, Rujing
Cai, Jinxiu
Li, Hao
Chan, Wei Sheng
Liu, Pan
Yi, Lei
Zhang, Shaosen
Li, Weihua
Jiang, Tao
He, Kunlun
Wu, Zhenzhou
author_facet Gao, Peiyi
Shan, Wei
Guo, Yue
Wang, Yinyan
Sun, Rujing
Cai, Jinxiu
Li, Hao
Chan, Wei Sheng
Liu, Pan
Yi, Lei
Zhang, Shaosen
Li, Weihua
Jiang, Tao
He, Kunlun
Wu, Zhenzhou
author_sort Gao, Peiyi
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Deep learning may be able to use patient magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data to aid in brain tumor classification and diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To develop and clinically validate a deep learning system for automated identification and classification of 18 types of brain tumors from patient MRI data. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This diagnostic study was conducted using MRI data collected between 2000 and 2019 from 37 871 patients. A deep learning system for segmentation and classification of 18 types of intracranial tumors based on T1- and T2-weighted images and T2 contrast MRI sequences was developed and tested. The diagnostic accuracy of the system was tested using 1 internal and 3 external independent data sets. The clinical value of the system was assessed by comparing the tumor diagnostic accuracy of neuroradiologists with vs without assistance of the proposed system using a separate internal test data set. Data were analyzed from March 2019 through February 2020. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Changes in neuroradiologist clinical diagnostic accuracy in brain MRI scans with vs without the deep learning system were evaluated. RESULTS: A deep learning system was trained among 37 871 patients (mean [SD] age, 41.6 [11.4] years; 18 519 women [48.9%]). It achieved a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.84-0.99) on 1339 patients from 4 centers’ data sets in diagnosis and classification of 18 types of tumors. Higher outcomes were found compared with neuroradiologists for accuracy and sensitivity and similar outcomes for specificity (for 300 patients in the Tiantan Hospital test data set: accuracy, 73.3% [95% CI, 67.7%-77.7%] vs 60.9% [95% CI, 46.8%-75.1%]; sensitivity, 88.9% [95% CI, 85.3%-92.4%] vs 53.4% [95% CI, 41.8%–64.9%]; and specificity, 96.3% [95% CI, 94.2%-98.4%] vs 97.9%; [95% CI, 97.3%-98.5%]). With the assistance of the deep learning system, the mean accuracy of neuroradiologists among 1166 patients increased by 12.0 percentage points, from 63.5% (95% CI, 60.7%-66.2%) without assistance to 75.5% (95% CI, 73.0%-77.9%) with assistance. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that deep learning system–based automated diagnosis may be associated with improved classification and diagnosis of intracranial tumors from MRI data among neuroradiologists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9361083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93610832022-08-19 Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Brain Tumor Diagnosis and Classification Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Gao, Peiyi Shan, Wei Guo, Yue Wang, Yinyan Sun, Rujing Cai, Jinxiu Li, Hao Chan, Wei Sheng Liu, Pan Yi, Lei Zhang, Shaosen Li, Weihua Jiang, Tao He, Kunlun Wu, Zhenzhou JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Deep learning may be able to use patient magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data to aid in brain tumor classification and diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To develop and clinically validate a deep learning system for automated identification and classification of 18 types of brain tumors from patient MRI data. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This diagnostic study was conducted using MRI data collected between 2000 and 2019 from 37 871 patients. A deep learning system for segmentation and classification of 18 types of intracranial tumors based on T1- and T2-weighted images and T2 contrast MRI sequences was developed and tested. The diagnostic accuracy of the system was tested using 1 internal and 3 external independent data sets. The clinical value of the system was assessed by comparing the tumor diagnostic accuracy of neuroradiologists with vs without assistance of the proposed system using a separate internal test data set. Data were analyzed from March 2019 through February 2020. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Changes in neuroradiologist clinical diagnostic accuracy in brain MRI scans with vs without the deep learning system were evaluated. RESULTS: A deep learning system was trained among 37 871 patients (mean [SD] age, 41.6 [11.4] years; 18 519 women [48.9%]). It achieved a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.84-0.99) on 1339 patients from 4 centers’ data sets in diagnosis and classification of 18 types of tumors. Higher outcomes were found compared with neuroradiologists for accuracy and sensitivity and similar outcomes for specificity (for 300 patients in the Tiantan Hospital test data set: accuracy, 73.3% [95% CI, 67.7%-77.7%] vs 60.9% [95% CI, 46.8%-75.1%]; sensitivity, 88.9% [95% CI, 85.3%-92.4%] vs 53.4% [95% CI, 41.8%–64.9%]; and specificity, 96.3% [95% CI, 94.2%-98.4%] vs 97.9%; [95% CI, 97.3%-98.5%]). With the assistance of the deep learning system, the mean accuracy of neuroradiologists among 1166 patients increased by 12.0 percentage points, from 63.5% (95% CI, 60.7%-66.2%) without assistance to 75.5% (95% CI, 73.0%-77.9%) with assistance. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that deep learning system–based automated diagnosis may be associated with improved classification and diagnosis of intracranial tumors from MRI data among neuroradiologists. American Medical Association 2022-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9361083/ /pubmed/35939301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.25608 Text en Copyright 2022 Gao P et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Gao, Peiyi
Shan, Wei
Guo, Yue
Wang, Yinyan
Sun, Rujing
Cai, Jinxiu
Li, Hao
Chan, Wei Sheng
Liu, Pan
Yi, Lei
Zhang, Shaosen
Li, Weihua
Jiang, Tao
He, Kunlun
Wu, Zhenzhou
Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Brain Tumor Diagnosis and Classification Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Brain Tumor Diagnosis and Classification Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Brain Tumor Diagnosis and Classification Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_fullStr Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Brain Tumor Diagnosis and Classification Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Brain Tumor Diagnosis and Classification Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_short Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Brain Tumor Diagnosis and Classification Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_sort development and validation of a deep learning model for brain tumor diagnosis and classification using magnetic resonance imaging
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9361083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35939301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.25608
work_keys_str_mv AT gaopeiyi developmentandvalidationofadeeplearningmodelforbraintumordiagnosisandclassificationusingmagneticresonanceimaging
AT shanwei developmentandvalidationofadeeplearningmodelforbraintumordiagnosisandclassificationusingmagneticresonanceimaging
AT guoyue developmentandvalidationofadeeplearningmodelforbraintumordiagnosisandclassificationusingmagneticresonanceimaging
AT wangyinyan developmentandvalidationofadeeplearningmodelforbraintumordiagnosisandclassificationusingmagneticresonanceimaging
AT sunrujing developmentandvalidationofadeeplearningmodelforbraintumordiagnosisandclassificationusingmagneticresonanceimaging
AT caijinxiu developmentandvalidationofadeeplearningmodelforbraintumordiagnosisandclassificationusingmagneticresonanceimaging
AT lihao developmentandvalidationofadeeplearningmodelforbraintumordiagnosisandclassificationusingmagneticresonanceimaging
AT chanweisheng developmentandvalidationofadeeplearningmodelforbraintumordiagnosisandclassificationusingmagneticresonanceimaging
AT liupan developmentandvalidationofadeeplearningmodelforbraintumordiagnosisandclassificationusingmagneticresonanceimaging
AT yilei developmentandvalidationofadeeplearningmodelforbraintumordiagnosisandclassificationusingmagneticresonanceimaging
AT zhangshaosen developmentandvalidationofadeeplearningmodelforbraintumordiagnosisandclassificationusingmagneticresonanceimaging
AT liweihua developmentandvalidationofadeeplearningmodelforbraintumordiagnosisandclassificationusingmagneticresonanceimaging
AT jiangtao developmentandvalidationofadeeplearningmodelforbraintumordiagnosisandclassificationusingmagneticresonanceimaging
AT hekunlun developmentandvalidationofadeeplearningmodelforbraintumordiagnosisandclassificationusingmagneticresonanceimaging
AT wuzhenzhou developmentandvalidationofadeeplearningmodelforbraintumordiagnosisandclassificationusingmagneticresonanceimaging