Cargando…
Assessment of the control measures of the Category A diseases of the Animal Health Law: prohibitions in restricted zones and risk‐mitigating treatments for products of animal origin and other materials
EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of prohibitions of certain activities in restricted zones, and of certain risk mitigation treatments for products of animal origin and other materials with respect to diseases included in the Category A list in the Anim...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9361132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35958104 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7443 |
_version_ | 1784764466689212416 |
---|---|
author | Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, José Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Padalino, Barbara Pasquali, Paolo Stahl, Karl Calvo, Antonio Velarde Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph De Clercq, Kris Sjunnesson, Ylva Gervelmeyer, Andrea Roberts, Helen Clare |
author_facet | Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, José Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Padalino, Barbara Pasquali, Paolo Stahl, Karl Calvo, Antonio Velarde Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph De Clercq, Kris Sjunnesson, Ylva Gervelmeyer, Andrea Roberts, Helen Clare |
collection | PubMed |
description | EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of prohibitions of certain activities in restricted zones, and of certain risk mitigation treatments for products of animal origin and other materials with respect to diseases included in the Category A list in the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) 2016/429). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where other disease‐specific control measures have been assessed. In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of (i) prohibiting the movements of certain products, notably germinal products (semen, oocytes, embryos and hatching eggs), products of animal origin and animal by‐products and feed of plant origin, hay and straw, and (ii) risk mitigation treatments for products of animal origin. In terms of semen, oocytes, embryos and hatching eggs, it was agreed that there was a lack of evidence particularly for embryos and oocytes reflected in a varying degree of uncertainty, whether these commodities could potentially contain the pathogen under consideration. The scenario assessed did not consider whether the presence of pathogen would lead to infection in the recipient animal. In terms of animal products, certain animal by‐products and movement of feed of plant origin and straw, the assessment considered the ability of the commodity to transmit disease to another animal if exposed. For most pathogens, products were to some degree considered a risk, but lack of field evidence contributed to the uncertainty, particularly as potential exposure of ruminants to meat products is concerned. In terms of the risk mitigating treatments, recommendations have been made for several of these treatments, because the treatment description is not complete, the evidence is poor or inconclusive, or the evidence points to the treatment being ineffective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9361132 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93611322022-08-10 Assessment of the control measures of the Category A diseases of the Animal Health Law: prohibitions in restricted zones and risk‐mitigating treatments for products of animal origin and other materials Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, José Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Padalino, Barbara Pasquali, Paolo Stahl, Karl Calvo, Antonio Velarde Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph De Clercq, Kris Sjunnesson, Ylva Gervelmeyer, Andrea Roberts, Helen Clare EFSA J Scientific Opinion EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of prohibitions of certain activities in restricted zones, and of certain risk mitigation treatments for products of animal origin and other materials with respect to diseases included in the Category A list in the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) 2016/429). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where other disease‐specific control measures have been assessed. In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of (i) prohibiting the movements of certain products, notably germinal products (semen, oocytes, embryos and hatching eggs), products of animal origin and animal by‐products and feed of plant origin, hay and straw, and (ii) risk mitigation treatments for products of animal origin. In terms of semen, oocytes, embryos and hatching eggs, it was agreed that there was a lack of evidence particularly for embryos and oocytes reflected in a varying degree of uncertainty, whether these commodities could potentially contain the pathogen under consideration. The scenario assessed did not consider whether the presence of pathogen would lead to infection in the recipient animal. In terms of animal products, certain animal by‐products and movement of feed of plant origin and straw, the assessment considered the ability of the commodity to transmit disease to another animal if exposed. For most pathogens, products were to some degree considered a risk, but lack of field evidence contributed to the uncertainty, particularly as potential exposure of ruminants to meat products is concerned. In terms of the risk mitigating treatments, recommendations have been made for several of these treatments, because the treatment description is not complete, the evidence is poor or inconclusive, or the evidence points to the treatment being ineffective. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9361132/ /pubmed/35958104 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7443 Text en © 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, José Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Padalino, Barbara Pasquali, Paolo Stahl, Karl Calvo, Antonio Velarde Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph De Clercq, Kris Sjunnesson, Ylva Gervelmeyer, Andrea Roberts, Helen Clare Assessment of the control measures of the Category A diseases of the Animal Health Law: prohibitions in restricted zones and risk‐mitigating treatments for products of animal origin and other materials |
title | Assessment of the control measures of the Category A diseases of the Animal Health Law: prohibitions in restricted zones and risk‐mitigating treatments for products of animal origin and other materials |
title_full | Assessment of the control measures of the Category A diseases of the Animal Health Law: prohibitions in restricted zones and risk‐mitigating treatments for products of animal origin and other materials |
title_fullStr | Assessment of the control measures of the Category A diseases of the Animal Health Law: prohibitions in restricted zones and risk‐mitigating treatments for products of animal origin and other materials |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of the control measures of the Category A diseases of the Animal Health Law: prohibitions in restricted zones and risk‐mitigating treatments for products of animal origin and other materials |
title_short | Assessment of the control measures of the Category A diseases of the Animal Health Law: prohibitions in restricted zones and risk‐mitigating treatments for products of animal origin and other materials |
title_sort | assessment of the control measures of the category a diseases of the animal health law: prohibitions in restricted zones and risk‐mitigating treatments for products of animal origin and other materials |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9361132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35958104 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7443 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawprohibitionsinrestrictedzonesandriskmitigatingtreatmentsforproductsofanimaloriginandothermaterials AT nielsensørensaxmose assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawprohibitionsinrestrictedzonesandriskmitigatingtreatmentsforproductsofanimaloriginandothermaterials AT alvarezjulio assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawprohibitionsinrestrictedzonesandriskmitigatingtreatmentsforproductsofanimaloriginandothermaterials AT bicoutdominiquejoseph assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawprohibitionsinrestrictedzonesandriskmitigatingtreatmentsforproductsofanimaloriginandothermaterials AT calistripaolo assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawprohibitionsinrestrictedzonesandriskmitigatingtreatmentsforproductsofanimaloriginandothermaterials AT canalielisabetta assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawprohibitionsinrestrictedzonesandriskmitigatingtreatmentsforproductsofanimaloriginandothermaterials AT drewejulianashley assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawprohibitionsinrestrictedzonesandriskmitigatingtreatmentsforproductsofanimaloriginandothermaterials AT garinbastujibruno assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawprohibitionsinrestrictedzonesandriskmitigatingtreatmentsforproductsofanimaloriginandothermaterials AT gonzalesrojasjoseluis assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawprohibitionsinrestrictedzonesandriskmitigatingtreatmentsforproductsofanimaloriginandothermaterials AT gortazarschmidtchristian assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawprohibitionsinrestrictedzonesandriskmitigatingtreatmentsforproductsofanimaloriginandothermaterials AT herskinmette assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawprohibitionsinrestrictedzonesandriskmitigatingtreatmentsforproductsofanimaloriginandothermaterials AT michelvirginie assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawprohibitionsinrestrictedzonesandriskmitigatingtreatmentsforproductsofanimaloriginandothermaterials AT mirandachuecamiguelangel assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawprohibitionsinrestrictedzonesandriskmitigatingtreatmentsforproductsofanimaloriginandothermaterials AT padalinobarbara assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawprohibitionsinrestrictedzonesandriskmitigatingtreatmentsforproductsofanimaloriginandothermaterials AT pasqualipaolo assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawprohibitionsinrestrictedzonesandriskmitigatingtreatmentsforproductsofanimaloriginandothermaterials AT stahlkarl assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawprohibitionsinrestrictedzonesandriskmitigatingtreatmentsforproductsofanimaloriginandothermaterials AT calvoantoniovelarde assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawprohibitionsinrestrictedzonesandriskmitigatingtreatmentsforproductsofanimaloriginandothermaterials AT viltroparvo assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawprohibitionsinrestrictedzonesandriskmitigatingtreatmentsforproductsofanimaloriginandothermaterials AT wincklerchristoph assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawprohibitionsinrestrictedzonesandriskmitigatingtreatmentsforproductsofanimaloriginandothermaterials AT declercqkris assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawprohibitionsinrestrictedzonesandriskmitigatingtreatmentsforproductsofanimaloriginandothermaterials AT sjunnessonylva assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawprohibitionsinrestrictedzonesandriskmitigatingtreatmentsforproductsofanimaloriginandothermaterials AT gervelmeyerandrea assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawprohibitionsinrestrictedzonesandriskmitigatingtreatmentsforproductsofanimaloriginandothermaterials AT robertshelenclare assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawprohibitionsinrestrictedzonesandriskmitigatingtreatmentsforproductsofanimaloriginandothermaterials |