Cargando…

Low-Dose NOACs Versus Standard-Dose NOACs or Warfarin on Efficacy and Safety in Asian Patients with NVAF: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: The meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials has illustrated that the efficacy of low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants is inferior compared with standard-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, though they are still frequently prescribed for Asian patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Ze, Zheng, Yingming, Li, Dandan, Wang, Xiaozhen, Cheng, Sheng, Luo, Xiao, Wen, Aiping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Turkish Society of Cardiology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9361199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35703478
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2022.1376
_version_ 1784764478809702400
author Li, Ze
Zheng, Yingming
Li, Dandan
Wang, Xiaozhen
Cheng, Sheng
Luo, Xiao
Wen, Aiping
author_facet Li, Ze
Zheng, Yingming
Li, Dandan
Wang, Xiaozhen
Cheng, Sheng
Luo, Xiao
Wen, Aiping
author_sort Li, Ze
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials has illustrated that the efficacy of low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants is inferior compared with standard-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, though they are still frequently prescribed for Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. We aimed to further investigate the efficacy and safety of low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants by carrying out a meta-analysis of all relevant randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. METHODS: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and MEDLINE were systematically searched from the inception to September 9, 2021, for randomized controlled trials or cohorts that compared the efficacy and/or safety of low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. The primary outcomes were stroke and major bleeding, and the secondary outcomes were mortality, intracranial hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Hazard ratios and 95% CIs were estimated using the random-effect model. RESULTS: Nineteen publications involving 371 574 Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation were included. Compared with standard-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants showed comparable risks of stroke (hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% CI 0.98 to 1.42), major bleeding (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI 0.83 to 1.21), intracranial hemorrhage (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI 0.92 to 1.38), and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.31), though had a higher risk of mortality (hazard ratio, 1.34; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.71). Compared with warfarin, low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants were associated with lower risks of stroke (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI 0.67 to 0.79), mortality (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.81), major bleeding (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.75), intracranial hemorrhage (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.69), and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI 0.65 to 0.93). CONCLUSION: Low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants were superior to warfarin, and comparable to standard-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants considering risks of stroke, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Further, high qualified studies are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9361199
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Turkish Society of Cardiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93611992022-08-15 Low-Dose NOACs Versus Standard-Dose NOACs or Warfarin on Efficacy and Safety in Asian Patients with NVAF: A Meta-Analysis Li, Ze Zheng, Yingming Li, Dandan Wang, Xiaozhen Cheng, Sheng Luo, Xiao Wen, Aiping Anatol J Cardiol Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: The meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials has illustrated that the efficacy of low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants is inferior compared with standard-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, though they are still frequently prescribed for Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. We aimed to further investigate the efficacy and safety of low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants by carrying out a meta-analysis of all relevant randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. METHODS: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and MEDLINE were systematically searched from the inception to September 9, 2021, for randomized controlled trials or cohorts that compared the efficacy and/or safety of low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. The primary outcomes were stroke and major bleeding, and the secondary outcomes were mortality, intracranial hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Hazard ratios and 95% CIs were estimated using the random-effect model. RESULTS: Nineteen publications involving 371 574 Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation were included. Compared with standard-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants showed comparable risks of stroke (hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% CI 0.98 to 1.42), major bleeding (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI 0.83 to 1.21), intracranial hemorrhage (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI 0.92 to 1.38), and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.31), though had a higher risk of mortality (hazard ratio, 1.34; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.71). Compared with warfarin, low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants were associated with lower risks of stroke (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI 0.67 to 0.79), mortality (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.81), major bleeding (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.75), intracranial hemorrhage (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.69), and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI 0.65 to 0.93). CONCLUSION: Low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants were superior to warfarin, and comparable to standard-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants considering risks of stroke, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Further, high qualified studies are warranted. Turkish Society of Cardiology 2022-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9361199/ /pubmed/35703478 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2022.1376 Text en © Copyright 2022 authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Li, Ze
Zheng, Yingming
Li, Dandan
Wang, Xiaozhen
Cheng, Sheng
Luo, Xiao
Wen, Aiping
Low-Dose NOACs Versus Standard-Dose NOACs or Warfarin on Efficacy and Safety in Asian Patients with NVAF: A Meta-Analysis
title Low-Dose NOACs Versus Standard-Dose NOACs or Warfarin on Efficacy and Safety in Asian Patients with NVAF: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Low-Dose NOACs Versus Standard-Dose NOACs or Warfarin on Efficacy and Safety in Asian Patients with NVAF: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Low-Dose NOACs Versus Standard-Dose NOACs or Warfarin on Efficacy and Safety in Asian Patients with NVAF: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Low-Dose NOACs Versus Standard-Dose NOACs or Warfarin on Efficacy and Safety in Asian Patients with NVAF: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Low-Dose NOACs Versus Standard-Dose NOACs or Warfarin on Efficacy and Safety in Asian Patients with NVAF: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort low-dose noacs versus standard-dose noacs or warfarin on efficacy and safety in asian patients with nvaf: a meta-analysis
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9361199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35703478
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2022.1376
work_keys_str_mv AT lize lowdosenoacsversusstandarddosenoacsorwarfarinonefficacyandsafetyinasianpatientswithnvafametaanalysis
AT zhengyingming lowdosenoacsversusstandarddosenoacsorwarfarinonefficacyandsafetyinasianpatientswithnvafametaanalysis
AT lidandan lowdosenoacsversusstandarddosenoacsorwarfarinonefficacyandsafetyinasianpatientswithnvafametaanalysis
AT wangxiaozhen lowdosenoacsversusstandarddosenoacsorwarfarinonefficacyandsafetyinasianpatientswithnvafametaanalysis
AT chengsheng lowdosenoacsversusstandarddosenoacsorwarfarinonefficacyandsafetyinasianpatientswithnvafametaanalysis
AT luoxiao lowdosenoacsversusstandarddosenoacsorwarfarinonefficacyandsafetyinasianpatientswithnvafametaanalysis
AT wenaiping lowdosenoacsversusstandarddosenoacsorwarfarinonefficacyandsafetyinasianpatientswithnvafametaanalysis