Cargando…

Comparison of Sequential POT-Side-POT and Kissing Balloon Techniques in Patients with Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Treated with Single-Stent Strategy; Which One is Simple and Safe? Propensity Score Analysis

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether the novel POT-side-POT technique is more useful than the commonly preferred kissing balloon inflation in patients with non-complex coronary bifurcation lesions treated with a single-stent strategy. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of POT-side-POT an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Çetinkal, Gökhan, Balaban Koçaş, Betül, Keskin, Kudret, Kilci, Hakan, Selim Ser, Özgür, Kılıçkesmez, Kadriye
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Turkish Society of Cardiology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9361205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35791712
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2022.1136
_version_ 1784764480276660224
author Çetinkal, Gökhan
Balaban Koçaş, Betül
Keskin, Kudret
Kilci, Hakan
Selim Ser, Özgür
Kılıçkesmez, Kadriye
author_facet Çetinkal, Gökhan
Balaban Koçaş, Betül
Keskin, Kudret
Kilci, Hakan
Selim Ser, Özgür
Kılıçkesmez, Kadriye
author_sort Çetinkal, Gökhan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether the novel POT-side-POT technique is more useful than the commonly preferred kissing balloon inflation in patients with non-complex coronary bifurcation lesions treated with a single-stent strategy. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of POT-side-POT and kissing balloon inflation techniques in one-stent strategy for non-complex coronary bifurcation lesions. METHODS: In this study, 283 patients were retrospectively analyzed (POT-side-POT group, n = 149; KBI group, n = 134). Primary endpoints of the study were defined as follows: in-hospital and 30-day mortality, contrast-induced acute kidney injury, stent thrombosis, side branch dissection, and need for side-branch stenting. Characteristics of patients at baseline were balanced by using propensity score inverse probability weighting. RESULTS: Procedure time (minute, 30.6 ± 8.5 vs. 34.3 ± 11.6; P = .003) and contrast volume (milliliter, 153.7 ± 42.4 vs. 171.1 ± 58.2; P = .004) were significantly lower in POT-side-POT group. Besides, side branch residual stenosis and number of patients with >50% side branch residual stenosis remained significantly higher in POT-side-POT group both in general and true bifurcation subgroup analysis (20.3 ± 19.8% vs. 16.5 ± 16.4%, P = .022; 11.9% vs. 5.7%, P = .013 and 24.1 ± 23.2% vs. 18.8 ± 18.7%, P = .033; 17.6% vs. 6.6%, P = .005; respectively). Combined clinical adverse outcomes were similar between groups. Side branch dissection (10.2% vs. 20.1%, P = .001) and need for side branch stenting (12.6% vs. 19%, P = .040) reached statistically significance in kissing balloon inflation group after adjustment. CONCLUSION: POT-side-POT may be a simple and safe technique with a shorter procedure time and lower incidence of adverse clinical events in non-complex coronary bifurcation lesions treated with single-stent strategy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9361205
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Turkish Society of Cardiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93612052022-08-18 Comparison of Sequential POT-Side-POT and Kissing Balloon Techniques in Patients with Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Treated with Single-Stent Strategy; Which One is Simple and Safe? Propensity Score Analysis Çetinkal, Gökhan Balaban Koçaş, Betül Keskin, Kudret Kilci, Hakan Selim Ser, Özgür Kılıçkesmez, Kadriye Anatol J Cardiol Original Investigation BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether the novel POT-side-POT technique is more useful than the commonly preferred kissing balloon inflation in patients with non-complex coronary bifurcation lesions treated with a single-stent strategy. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of POT-side-POT and kissing balloon inflation techniques in one-stent strategy for non-complex coronary bifurcation lesions. METHODS: In this study, 283 patients were retrospectively analyzed (POT-side-POT group, n = 149; KBI group, n = 134). Primary endpoints of the study were defined as follows: in-hospital and 30-day mortality, contrast-induced acute kidney injury, stent thrombosis, side branch dissection, and need for side-branch stenting. Characteristics of patients at baseline were balanced by using propensity score inverse probability weighting. RESULTS: Procedure time (minute, 30.6 ± 8.5 vs. 34.3 ± 11.6; P = .003) and contrast volume (milliliter, 153.7 ± 42.4 vs. 171.1 ± 58.2; P = .004) were significantly lower in POT-side-POT group. Besides, side branch residual stenosis and number of patients with >50% side branch residual stenosis remained significantly higher in POT-side-POT group both in general and true bifurcation subgroup analysis (20.3 ± 19.8% vs. 16.5 ± 16.4%, P = .022; 11.9% vs. 5.7%, P = .013 and 24.1 ± 23.2% vs. 18.8 ± 18.7%, P = .033; 17.6% vs. 6.6%, P = .005; respectively). Combined clinical adverse outcomes were similar between groups. Side branch dissection (10.2% vs. 20.1%, P = .001) and need for side branch stenting (12.6% vs. 19%, P = .040) reached statistically significance in kissing balloon inflation group after adjustment. CONCLUSION: POT-side-POT may be a simple and safe technique with a shorter procedure time and lower incidence of adverse clinical events in non-complex coronary bifurcation lesions treated with single-stent strategy. Turkish Society of Cardiology 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9361205/ /pubmed/35791712 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2022.1136 Text en © Copyright 2022 authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Çetinkal, Gökhan
Balaban Koçaş, Betül
Keskin, Kudret
Kilci, Hakan
Selim Ser, Özgür
Kılıçkesmez, Kadriye
Comparison of Sequential POT-Side-POT and Kissing Balloon Techniques in Patients with Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Treated with Single-Stent Strategy; Which One is Simple and Safe? Propensity Score Analysis
title Comparison of Sequential POT-Side-POT and Kissing Balloon Techniques in Patients with Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Treated with Single-Stent Strategy; Which One is Simple and Safe? Propensity Score Analysis
title_full Comparison of Sequential POT-Side-POT and Kissing Balloon Techniques in Patients with Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Treated with Single-Stent Strategy; Which One is Simple and Safe? Propensity Score Analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of Sequential POT-Side-POT and Kissing Balloon Techniques in Patients with Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Treated with Single-Stent Strategy; Which One is Simple and Safe? Propensity Score Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Sequential POT-Side-POT and Kissing Balloon Techniques in Patients with Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Treated with Single-Stent Strategy; Which One is Simple and Safe? Propensity Score Analysis
title_short Comparison of Sequential POT-Side-POT and Kissing Balloon Techniques in Patients with Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Treated with Single-Stent Strategy; Which One is Simple and Safe? Propensity Score Analysis
title_sort comparison of sequential pot-side-pot and kissing balloon techniques in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with single-stent strategy; which one is simple and safe? propensity score analysis
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9361205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35791712
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2022.1136
work_keys_str_mv AT cetinkalgokhan comparisonofsequentialpotsidepotandkissingballoontechniquesinpatientswithcoronarybifurcationlesionstreatedwithsinglestentstrategywhichoneissimpleandsafepropensityscoreanalysis
AT balabankocasbetul comparisonofsequentialpotsidepotandkissingballoontechniquesinpatientswithcoronarybifurcationlesionstreatedwithsinglestentstrategywhichoneissimpleandsafepropensityscoreanalysis
AT keskinkudret comparisonofsequentialpotsidepotandkissingballoontechniquesinpatientswithcoronarybifurcationlesionstreatedwithsinglestentstrategywhichoneissimpleandsafepropensityscoreanalysis
AT kilcihakan comparisonofsequentialpotsidepotandkissingballoontechniquesinpatientswithcoronarybifurcationlesionstreatedwithsinglestentstrategywhichoneissimpleandsafepropensityscoreanalysis
AT selimserozgur comparisonofsequentialpotsidepotandkissingballoontechniquesinpatientswithcoronarybifurcationlesionstreatedwithsinglestentstrategywhichoneissimpleandsafepropensityscoreanalysis
AT kılıckesmezkadriye comparisonofsequentialpotsidepotandkissingballoontechniquesinpatientswithcoronarybifurcationlesionstreatedwithsinglestentstrategywhichoneissimpleandsafepropensityscoreanalysis