Cargando…
Home urinary tract infection testing: patient experience and satisfaction with polymerase chain reaction kit
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We sought to evaluate patient satisfaction with a novel multiplex PCR UTI home collection kit for symptomatic UTI in a urogynecologic population. We secondarily sought to characterize reported uropathogens and resistance profiles of uropathogens in this population. We hy...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9361247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35943561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05309-z |
_version_ | 1784764490120691712 |
---|---|
author | Melnyk, Alexandra I. Toal, Coralee Glass Clark, Stephanie Bradley, Megan |
author_facet | Melnyk, Alexandra I. Toal, Coralee Glass Clark, Stephanie Bradley, Megan |
author_sort | Melnyk, Alexandra I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We sought to evaluate patient satisfaction with a novel multiplex PCR UTI home collection kit for symptomatic UTI in a urogynecologic population. We secondarily sought to characterize reported uropathogens and resistance profiles of uropathogens in this population. We hypothesized that patients would be satisfied. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of women who were surveyed later about their experience undergoing evaluation for a UTI with a home UTI test at a large tertiary care urogynecology practice in 2020. Symptomatic patients were sent a home UTI kit. We assessed patient satisfaction at a later time with a 5-point Likert scale and collected baseline information. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction with this experience. Secondary outcomes included type and number of uropathogens on testing. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients [73% white race, mean age 71.9 (SD 12.0) years] were surveyed. Patients responded with a mean score of 4.7/5 to all satisfaction questions. Overall, 86% (26/30) of patients would choose this test again. Of those asked if they would choose this test again outside of the COVID-19 pandemic, 86% responded affirmatively. The most common symptoms reported included dysuria (53%), urgency (37%) and frequency (30%). The most common pathogens identified included Escherichia coli (70%), Enterococcus faecalis (60%) and Aerococcus urinae (43%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients were satisfied with home UTI PCR testing and the majority would choose this option again. Home UTI PCR testing revealed common uropathogens for a population with a high proportion of recurrent UTI, but additional research comparing home versus in-office urine PCR testing is necessary. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9361247 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93612472022-08-09 Home urinary tract infection testing: patient experience and satisfaction with polymerase chain reaction kit Melnyk, Alexandra I. Toal, Coralee Glass Clark, Stephanie Bradley, Megan Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We sought to evaluate patient satisfaction with a novel multiplex PCR UTI home collection kit for symptomatic UTI in a urogynecologic population. We secondarily sought to characterize reported uropathogens and resistance profiles of uropathogens in this population. We hypothesized that patients would be satisfied. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of women who were surveyed later about their experience undergoing evaluation for a UTI with a home UTI test at a large tertiary care urogynecology practice in 2020. Symptomatic patients were sent a home UTI kit. We assessed patient satisfaction at a later time with a 5-point Likert scale and collected baseline information. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction with this experience. Secondary outcomes included type and number of uropathogens on testing. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients [73% white race, mean age 71.9 (SD 12.0) years] were surveyed. Patients responded with a mean score of 4.7/5 to all satisfaction questions. Overall, 86% (26/30) of patients would choose this test again. Of those asked if they would choose this test again outside of the COVID-19 pandemic, 86% responded affirmatively. The most common symptoms reported included dysuria (53%), urgency (37%) and frequency (30%). The most common pathogens identified included Escherichia coli (70%), Enterococcus faecalis (60%) and Aerococcus urinae (43%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients were satisfied with home UTI PCR testing and the majority would choose this option again. Home UTI PCR testing revealed common uropathogens for a population with a high proportion of recurrent UTI, but additional research comparing home versus in-office urine PCR testing is necessary. Springer International Publishing 2022-08-09 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9361247/ /pubmed/35943561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05309-z Text en © The International Urogynecological Association 2022, corrected publication 2022Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Melnyk, Alexandra I. Toal, Coralee Glass Clark, Stephanie Bradley, Megan Home urinary tract infection testing: patient experience and satisfaction with polymerase chain reaction kit |
title | Home urinary tract infection testing: patient experience and satisfaction with polymerase chain reaction kit |
title_full | Home urinary tract infection testing: patient experience and satisfaction with polymerase chain reaction kit |
title_fullStr | Home urinary tract infection testing: patient experience and satisfaction with polymerase chain reaction kit |
title_full_unstemmed | Home urinary tract infection testing: patient experience and satisfaction with polymerase chain reaction kit |
title_short | Home urinary tract infection testing: patient experience and satisfaction with polymerase chain reaction kit |
title_sort | home urinary tract infection testing: patient experience and satisfaction with polymerase chain reaction kit |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9361247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35943561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05309-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT melnykalexandrai homeurinarytractinfectiontestingpatientexperienceandsatisfactionwithpolymerasechainreactionkit AT toalcoralee homeurinarytractinfectiontestingpatientexperienceandsatisfactionwithpolymerasechainreactionkit AT glassclarkstephanie homeurinarytractinfectiontestingpatientexperienceandsatisfactionwithpolymerasechainreactionkit AT bradleymegan homeurinarytractinfectiontestingpatientexperienceandsatisfactionwithpolymerasechainreactionkit |