Cargando…
Intrafractional monitoring of patients using four different immobilization mask systems for cranial radiotherapy
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients receiving cranial radiotherapy are immobilized with a thermoplastic mask to restrict patient motion. Depending on the target volume margins and treatment dose, different mask systems are used. Intrafractional movements can be monitored using stereoscopic X-ray imagin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9361321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35958289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.07.002 |
_version_ | 1784764507766128640 |
---|---|
author | Reitz, Daniel Muecke, Johannes da Silva Mendes, Vanessa Landry, Guillaume Reiner, Michael Niyazi, Maximilian Belka, Claus Freislederer, Philipp Corradini, Stefanie |
author_facet | Reitz, Daniel Muecke, Johannes da Silva Mendes, Vanessa Landry, Guillaume Reiner, Michael Niyazi, Maximilian Belka, Claus Freislederer, Philipp Corradini, Stefanie |
author_sort | Reitz, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients receiving cranial radiotherapy are immobilized with a thermoplastic mask to restrict patient motion. Depending on the target volume margins and treatment dose, different mask systems are used. Intrafractional movements can be monitored using stereoscopic X-ray imaging. The aim of the present work was to compare the magnitudes of intrafractional deviation for different mask systems. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four different head mask systems (open face mask, open mask, stereotactic mask, double mask) used in the treatment of 40 patients were investigated. In total 487 treatment fractions and 3708 X-ray images were collected. Deviations were calculated by comparison of the acquired X-ray images with digitally reconstructed radiographs. The results of intrafractional X-ray deviations for translational and rotational axes were compared between the different mask systems. RESULTS: Deviations were below 0.6 mm for translations and below 0.6° for rotations for all mask systems. Along the lateral and longitudinal directions the stereotactic mask was superior, while along the vertical direction the double mask showed the lowest deviations. For low rotational deviations the double mask is the best amongst all other mask systems. CONCLUSION: As expected, the lowest movement was shown using cranial stereotactic mask systems. The results have shown deviations lower than 0.6 mm and 0.6° using any of the four thermoplastic mask systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9361321 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93613212022-08-10 Intrafractional monitoring of patients using four different immobilization mask systems for cranial radiotherapy Reitz, Daniel Muecke, Johannes da Silva Mendes, Vanessa Landry, Guillaume Reiner, Michael Niyazi, Maximilian Belka, Claus Freislederer, Philipp Corradini, Stefanie Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Article(s) from the Special Issue on Physics highlights from ESTRO 2021 BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients receiving cranial radiotherapy are immobilized with a thermoplastic mask to restrict patient motion. Depending on the target volume margins and treatment dose, different mask systems are used. Intrafractional movements can be monitored using stereoscopic X-ray imaging. The aim of the present work was to compare the magnitudes of intrafractional deviation for different mask systems. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four different head mask systems (open face mask, open mask, stereotactic mask, double mask) used in the treatment of 40 patients were investigated. In total 487 treatment fractions and 3708 X-ray images were collected. Deviations were calculated by comparison of the acquired X-ray images with digitally reconstructed radiographs. The results of intrafractional X-ray deviations for translational and rotational axes were compared between the different mask systems. RESULTS: Deviations were below 0.6 mm for translations and below 0.6° for rotations for all mask systems. Along the lateral and longitudinal directions the stereotactic mask was superior, while along the vertical direction the double mask showed the lowest deviations. For low rotational deviations the double mask is the best amongst all other mask systems. CONCLUSION: As expected, the lowest movement was shown using cranial stereotactic mask systems. The results have shown deviations lower than 0.6 mm and 0.6° using any of the four thermoplastic mask systems. Elsevier 2022-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9361321/ /pubmed/35958289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.07.002 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article(s) from the Special Issue on Physics highlights from ESTRO 2021 Reitz, Daniel Muecke, Johannes da Silva Mendes, Vanessa Landry, Guillaume Reiner, Michael Niyazi, Maximilian Belka, Claus Freislederer, Philipp Corradini, Stefanie Intrafractional monitoring of patients using four different immobilization mask systems for cranial radiotherapy |
title | Intrafractional monitoring of patients using four different immobilization mask systems for cranial radiotherapy |
title_full | Intrafractional monitoring of patients using four different immobilization mask systems for cranial radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Intrafractional monitoring of patients using four different immobilization mask systems for cranial radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Intrafractional monitoring of patients using four different immobilization mask systems for cranial radiotherapy |
title_short | Intrafractional monitoring of patients using four different immobilization mask systems for cranial radiotherapy |
title_sort | intrafractional monitoring of patients using four different immobilization mask systems for cranial radiotherapy |
topic | Article(s) from the Special Issue on Physics highlights from ESTRO 2021 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9361321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35958289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.07.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reitzdaniel intrafractionalmonitoringofpatientsusingfourdifferentimmobilizationmasksystemsforcranialradiotherapy AT mueckejohannes intrafractionalmonitoringofpatientsusingfourdifferentimmobilizationmasksystemsforcranialradiotherapy AT dasilvamendesvanessa intrafractionalmonitoringofpatientsusingfourdifferentimmobilizationmasksystemsforcranialradiotherapy AT landryguillaume intrafractionalmonitoringofpatientsusingfourdifferentimmobilizationmasksystemsforcranialradiotherapy AT reinermichael intrafractionalmonitoringofpatientsusingfourdifferentimmobilizationmasksystemsforcranialradiotherapy AT niyazimaximilian intrafractionalmonitoringofpatientsusingfourdifferentimmobilizationmasksystemsforcranialradiotherapy AT belkaclaus intrafractionalmonitoringofpatientsusingfourdifferentimmobilizationmasksystemsforcranialradiotherapy AT freisledererphilipp intrafractionalmonitoringofpatientsusingfourdifferentimmobilizationmasksystemsforcranialradiotherapy AT corradinistefanie intrafractionalmonitoringofpatientsusingfourdifferentimmobilizationmasksystemsforcranialradiotherapy |