Cargando…

Intrafractional monitoring of patients using four different immobilization mask systems for cranial radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients receiving cranial radiotherapy are immobilized with a thermoplastic mask to restrict patient motion. Depending on the target volume margins and treatment dose, different mask systems are used. Intrafractional movements can be monitored using stereoscopic X-ray imagin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reitz, Daniel, Muecke, Johannes, da Silva Mendes, Vanessa, Landry, Guillaume, Reiner, Michael, Niyazi, Maximilian, Belka, Claus, Freislederer, Philipp, Corradini, Stefanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9361321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35958289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.07.002
_version_ 1784764507766128640
author Reitz, Daniel
Muecke, Johannes
da Silva Mendes, Vanessa
Landry, Guillaume
Reiner, Michael
Niyazi, Maximilian
Belka, Claus
Freislederer, Philipp
Corradini, Stefanie
author_facet Reitz, Daniel
Muecke, Johannes
da Silva Mendes, Vanessa
Landry, Guillaume
Reiner, Michael
Niyazi, Maximilian
Belka, Claus
Freislederer, Philipp
Corradini, Stefanie
author_sort Reitz, Daniel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients receiving cranial radiotherapy are immobilized with a thermoplastic mask to restrict patient motion. Depending on the target volume margins and treatment dose, different mask systems are used. Intrafractional movements can be monitored using stereoscopic X-ray imaging. The aim of the present work was to compare the magnitudes of intrafractional deviation for different mask systems. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four different head mask systems (open face mask, open mask, stereotactic mask, double mask) used in the treatment of 40 patients were investigated. In total 487 treatment fractions and 3708 X-ray images were collected. Deviations were calculated by comparison of the acquired X-ray images with digitally reconstructed radiographs. The results of intrafractional X-ray deviations for translational and rotational axes were compared between the different mask systems. RESULTS: Deviations were below 0.6 mm for translations and below 0.6° for rotations for all mask systems. Along the lateral and longitudinal directions the stereotactic mask was superior, while along the vertical direction the double mask showed the lowest deviations. For low rotational deviations the double mask is the best amongst all other mask systems. CONCLUSION: As expected, the lowest movement was shown using cranial stereotactic mask systems. The results have shown deviations lower than 0.6 mm and 0.6° using any of the four thermoplastic mask systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9361321
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93613212022-08-10 Intrafractional monitoring of patients using four different immobilization mask systems for cranial radiotherapy Reitz, Daniel Muecke, Johannes da Silva Mendes, Vanessa Landry, Guillaume Reiner, Michael Niyazi, Maximilian Belka, Claus Freislederer, Philipp Corradini, Stefanie Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Article(s) from the Special Issue on Physics highlights from ESTRO 2021 BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients receiving cranial radiotherapy are immobilized with a thermoplastic mask to restrict patient motion. Depending on the target volume margins and treatment dose, different mask systems are used. Intrafractional movements can be monitored using stereoscopic X-ray imaging. The aim of the present work was to compare the magnitudes of intrafractional deviation for different mask systems. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four different head mask systems (open face mask, open mask, stereotactic mask, double mask) used in the treatment of 40 patients were investigated. In total 487 treatment fractions and 3708 X-ray images were collected. Deviations were calculated by comparison of the acquired X-ray images with digitally reconstructed radiographs. The results of intrafractional X-ray deviations for translational and rotational axes were compared between the different mask systems. RESULTS: Deviations were below 0.6 mm for translations and below 0.6° for rotations for all mask systems. Along the lateral and longitudinal directions the stereotactic mask was superior, while along the vertical direction the double mask showed the lowest deviations. For low rotational deviations the double mask is the best amongst all other mask systems. CONCLUSION: As expected, the lowest movement was shown using cranial stereotactic mask systems. The results have shown deviations lower than 0.6 mm and 0.6° using any of the four thermoplastic mask systems. Elsevier 2022-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9361321/ /pubmed/35958289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.07.002 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article(s) from the Special Issue on Physics highlights from ESTRO 2021
Reitz, Daniel
Muecke, Johannes
da Silva Mendes, Vanessa
Landry, Guillaume
Reiner, Michael
Niyazi, Maximilian
Belka, Claus
Freislederer, Philipp
Corradini, Stefanie
Intrafractional monitoring of patients using four different immobilization mask systems for cranial radiotherapy
title Intrafractional monitoring of patients using four different immobilization mask systems for cranial radiotherapy
title_full Intrafractional monitoring of patients using four different immobilization mask systems for cranial radiotherapy
title_fullStr Intrafractional monitoring of patients using four different immobilization mask systems for cranial radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Intrafractional monitoring of patients using four different immobilization mask systems for cranial radiotherapy
title_short Intrafractional monitoring of patients using four different immobilization mask systems for cranial radiotherapy
title_sort intrafractional monitoring of patients using four different immobilization mask systems for cranial radiotherapy
topic Article(s) from the Special Issue on Physics highlights from ESTRO 2021
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9361321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35958289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.07.002
work_keys_str_mv AT reitzdaniel intrafractionalmonitoringofpatientsusingfourdifferentimmobilizationmasksystemsforcranialradiotherapy
AT mueckejohannes intrafractionalmonitoringofpatientsusingfourdifferentimmobilizationmasksystemsforcranialradiotherapy
AT dasilvamendesvanessa intrafractionalmonitoringofpatientsusingfourdifferentimmobilizationmasksystemsforcranialradiotherapy
AT landryguillaume intrafractionalmonitoringofpatientsusingfourdifferentimmobilizationmasksystemsforcranialradiotherapy
AT reinermichael intrafractionalmonitoringofpatientsusingfourdifferentimmobilizationmasksystemsforcranialradiotherapy
AT niyazimaximilian intrafractionalmonitoringofpatientsusingfourdifferentimmobilizationmasksystemsforcranialradiotherapy
AT belkaclaus intrafractionalmonitoringofpatientsusingfourdifferentimmobilizationmasksystemsforcranialradiotherapy
AT freisledererphilipp intrafractionalmonitoringofpatientsusingfourdifferentimmobilizationmasksystemsforcranialradiotherapy
AT corradinistefanie intrafractionalmonitoringofpatientsusingfourdifferentimmobilizationmasksystemsforcranialradiotherapy