Cargando…

Safety and risk factors of TINAVI robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement in spinal surgery

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rates and risk factors of pedicle screw placement accuracy and the proximal facet joint violation (FJV) using TINAVI robot-assisted technique. METHODS: Patients with thoracolumbar fractures or degenerative diseases were retrospectively recruited from June 2018 and June 20...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Ren-Jie, Zhou, Lu-Ping, Zhang, Lai, Zhang, Hua-Qing, Zhang, Jian-Xiang, Shen, Cai-Liang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9361479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35941684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03271-6
_version_ 1784764541139156992
author Zhang, Ren-Jie
Zhou, Lu-Ping
Zhang, Lai
Zhang, Hua-Qing
Zhang, Jian-Xiang
Shen, Cai-Liang
author_facet Zhang, Ren-Jie
Zhou, Lu-Ping
Zhang, Lai
Zhang, Hua-Qing
Zhang, Jian-Xiang
Shen, Cai-Liang
author_sort Zhang, Ren-Jie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the rates and risk factors of pedicle screw placement accuracy and the proximal facet joint violation (FJV) using TINAVI robot-assisted technique. METHODS: Patients with thoracolumbar fractures or degenerative diseases were retrospectively recruited from June 2018 and June 2020. The pedicle penetration and proximal FJV were compared in different instrumental levels to identify the safe and risk segments during insertion. Moreover, the factors were also assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients with 332 pedicle screws were included in the current study. The optimal and clinically acceptable screw positions were 85.8% and 93.4%. Of the 332 screws concerning the intra-pedicular accuracy, 285 screws (85.8%) were evaluated as Grade A according to the Gertzbein and Robbins scale, with the remaining 25 (7.6%), 10 (3.0%), 6 (1.8%), and 6 screws (1.8%) as Grades B, C, D, and E. Moreover, in terms of the proximal FJV, 255 screws (76.8%) screws were assessed as Grade 0 according to the Babu scale, with the remaining 34 (10.3%), 22 (6.6%), and 21 screws (6.3%) as Grades 1, 2, and 3. Furthermore, the univariate analysis showed significantly higher rate of penetration for patients with age < 61 years old, sex of female, thoracolumbar insertion, shorter distance from skin to insertion point, and smaller facet angle. Meanwhile, the patients with the sex of female, BMI < 25.9, grade I spondylolisthesis, lumbosacral insertion, longer distance from skin to insertion point, and larger facet angle had a significantly higher rate of proximal FJV. The outcomes of multivariate analyses showed that sex of male (adjusted OR 0.320, 95% CI 0.140–0.732; p = 0.007), facet angle ≥ 45° (adjusted OR 0.266, 95% CI 0.090–0.786; p = 0.017), distance from skin to insertion point ≥ 4.5 cm (adjusted OR 0.342, 95% CI 0.134–0.868; p = 0.024), and lumbosacral instrumentation (adjusted OR 0.227, 95% CI 0.091–0.566; p = 0.001) were independently associated with intra-pedicular accuracy; the L5 insertion (adjusted OR 2.020, 95% CI 1.084–3.766; p = 0.027) and facet angle ≥ 45° (adjusted OR 1.839, 95% CI 1.026–3.298; p = 0.041) were independently associated with the proximal FJV. CONCLUSION: TINAVI robot-assisted technique was associated with a high rate of pedicle screw placement and a low rate of proximal FJV. This new technique showed a safe and precise performance for pedicle screw placement in spinal surgery. Facet angle ≥ 45° is independently associated with both the intra-pedicular accuracy and proximal FJV. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-022-03271-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9361479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93614792022-08-10 Safety and risk factors of TINAVI robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement in spinal surgery Zhang, Ren-Jie Zhou, Lu-Ping Zhang, Lai Zhang, Hua-Qing Zhang, Jian-Xiang Shen, Cai-Liang J Orthop Surg Res Research Article OBJECTIVE: To determine the rates and risk factors of pedicle screw placement accuracy and the proximal facet joint violation (FJV) using TINAVI robot-assisted technique. METHODS: Patients with thoracolumbar fractures or degenerative diseases were retrospectively recruited from June 2018 and June 2020. The pedicle penetration and proximal FJV were compared in different instrumental levels to identify the safe and risk segments during insertion. Moreover, the factors were also assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients with 332 pedicle screws were included in the current study. The optimal and clinically acceptable screw positions were 85.8% and 93.4%. Of the 332 screws concerning the intra-pedicular accuracy, 285 screws (85.8%) were evaluated as Grade A according to the Gertzbein and Robbins scale, with the remaining 25 (7.6%), 10 (3.0%), 6 (1.8%), and 6 screws (1.8%) as Grades B, C, D, and E. Moreover, in terms of the proximal FJV, 255 screws (76.8%) screws were assessed as Grade 0 according to the Babu scale, with the remaining 34 (10.3%), 22 (6.6%), and 21 screws (6.3%) as Grades 1, 2, and 3. Furthermore, the univariate analysis showed significantly higher rate of penetration for patients with age < 61 years old, sex of female, thoracolumbar insertion, shorter distance from skin to insertion point, and smaller facet angle. Meanwhile, the patients with the sex of female, BMI < 25.9, grade I spondylolisthesis, lumbosacral insertion, longer distance from skin to insertion point, and larger facet angle had a significantly higher rate of proximal FJV. The outcomes of multivariate analyses showed that sex of male (adjusted OR 0.320, 95% CI 0.140–0.732; p = 0.007), facet angle ≥ 45° (adjusted OR 0.266, 95% CI 0.090–0.786; p = 0.017), distance from skin to insertion point ≥ 4.5 cm (adjusted OR 0.342, 95% CI 0.134–0.868; p = 0.024), and lumbosacral instrumentation (adjusted OR 0.227, 95% CI 0.091–0.566; p = 0.001) were independently associated with intra-pedicular accuracy; the L5 insertion (adjusted OR 2.020, 95% CI 1.084–3.766; p = 0.027) and facet angle ≥ 45° (adjusted OR 1.839, 95% CI 1.026–3.298; p = 0.041) were independently associated with the proximal FJV. CONCLUSION: TINAVI robot-assisted technique was associated with a high rate of pedicle screw placement and a low rate of proximal FJV. This new technique showed a safe and precise performance for pedicle screw placement in spinal surgery. Facet angle ≥ 45° is independently associated with both the intra-pedicular accuracy and proximal FJV. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-022-03271-6. BioMed Central 2022-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9361479/ /pubmed/35941684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03271-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Ren-Jie
Zhou, Lu-Ping
Zhang, Lai
Zhang, Hua-Qing
Zhang, Jian-Xiang
Shen, Cai-Liang
Safety and risk factors of TINAVI robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement in spinal surgery
title Safety and risk factors of TINAVI robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement in spinal surgery
title_full Safety and risk factors of TINAVI robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement in spinal surgery
title_fullStr Safety and risk factors of TINAVI robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement in spinal surgery
title_full_unstemmed Safety and risk factors of TINAVI robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement in spinal surgery
title_short Safety and risk factors of TINAVI robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement in spinal surgery
title_sort safety and risk factors of tinavi robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement in spinal surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9361479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35941684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03271-6
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangrenjie safetyandriskfactorsoftinavirobotassistedpercutaneouspediclescrewplacementinspinalsurgery
AT zhouluping safetyandriskfactorsoftinavirobotassistedpercutaneouspediclescrewplacementinspinalsurgery
AT zhanglai safetyandriskfactorsoftinavirobotassistedpercutaneouspediclescrewplacementinspinalsurgery
AT zhanghuaqing safetyandriskfactorsoftinavirobotassistedpercutaneouspediclescrewplacementinspinalsurgery
AT zhangjianxiang safetyandriskfactorsoftinavirobotassistedpercutaneouspediclescrewplacementinspinalsurgery
AT shencailiang safetyandriskfactorsoftinavirobotassistedpercutaneouspediclescrewplacementinspinalsurgery