Cargando…
Digitally prefabricated versus conventionally fabricated implant-supported full-arch provisional prosthesis: a retrospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of digitally prefabricated and conventionally fabricated implant-supported full-arch provisional prostheses. METHODS: In this retrospective study, a total of 39 patients (22 males and 17 females) who underwent implant-supported full-arch reha...
Autores principales: | Chen, Chaoqun, Lai, Haiyan, Zhu, Huiyong, Gu, Xinhua |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9361685/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35945572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02376-y |
Ejemplares similares
-
Computer-assisted implant placement and full-arch immediate loading with digitally prefabricated provisional prostheses without cast: a prospective pilot cohort study
por: Makarov, Nikolay, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
In Vitro Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Impressions for Full-Arch Implant-Supported Prostheses
por: D’haese, Rani, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Impressions for Full-Arch Implant-Supported Prostheses: An In Vitro Study
por: Drancourt, Noemie, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Accuracy of Customized Prefabricated Screw-Type Immediate Provisional Restorations after Single-Implant Placement
por: Oh, Kyung Chul, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Full-Arch Impressions in Patients: An Update
por: Schmidt, Alexander, et al.
Publicado: (2020)