Cargando…

Primary stability of different implant macrodesigns in a sinus floor elevation simulated model: an ex vivo study

BACKGROUND: A novel type of implant (Straumann® BLX implant) has been developed for certain stability from the mechanical and biological aspects and is expected for the implant placement in atrophic maxilla with sinus floor elevation (SFE). PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the primary...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Imai, Mikio, Ogino, Yoichiro, Tanaka, Hideaki, Koyano, Kiyoshi, Ayukawa, Yasunori, Toyoshima, Takeshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9361700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35941575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02345-5
_version_ 1784764582046203904
author Imai, Mikio
Ogino, Yoichiro
Tanaka, Hideaki
Koyano, Kiyoshi
Ayukawa, Yasunori
Toyoshima, Takeshi
author_facet Imai, Mikio
Ogino, Yoichiro
Tanaka, Hideaki
Koyano, Kiyoshi
Ayukawa, Yasunori
Toyoshima, Takeshi
author_sort Imai, Mikio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A novel type of implant (Straumann® BLX implant) has been developed for certain stability from the mechanical and biological aspects and is expected for the implant placement in atrophic maxilla with sinus floor elevation (SFE). PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the primary stability in the implants with different macrodesigns in an SFE simulated model. Primary stabilities defined as maximum insertion torque (MIT) and implant stability quotient (ISQ) were compared between this novel type of implant and other types. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five types of Straumann® 10 mm length implants (Standard Plus; SP, Tapered Effect; TE, Bone Level; BL, Bone Level Tapered; BLT and BLX) and two types of Straumann® 6 mm length implants (SP short, BLX short) were used in this study. Each implant was inserted through 5 mm–thick porcine iliac crest blocks (an SFE simulated model). Primary stability was evaluated by using MIT and ISQ. RESULTS: The mean value of MIT for BLX group showed significantly higher values than SP, BL (p < 0.01), and TE (p < 0.05) groups. The mean value of ISQ for BLX group was significantly higher than the other groups (p < 0.01). The mean value of MIT and ISQ for BLX and BLX short group were significantly higher than those for SP and SP short group (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In an SFE simulated ex vivo model, BLX group showed the highest values. These results suggest that implant selection can play a crucial role in the achievement of primary stability during SFE and simultaneous implant placement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02345-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9361700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93617002022-08-10 Primary stability of different implant macrodesigns in a sinus floor elevation simulated model: an ex vivo study Imai, Mikio Ogino, Yoichiro Tanaka, Hideaki Koyano, Kiyoshi Ayukawa, Yasunori Toyoshima, Takeshi BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: A novel type of implant (Straumann® BLX implant) has been developed for certain stability from the mechanical and biological aspects and is expected for the implant placement in atrophic maxilla with sinus floor elevation (SFE). PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the primary stability in the implants with different macrodesigns in an SFE simulated model. Primary stabilities defined as maximum insertion torque (MIT) and implant stability quotient (ISQ) were compared between this novel type of implant and other types. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five types of Straumann® 10 mm length implants (Standard Plus; SP, Tapered Effect; TE, Bone Level; BL, Bone Level Tapered; BLT and BLX) and two types of Straumann® 6 mm length implants (SP short, BLX short) were used in this study. Each implant was inserted through 5 mm–thick porcine iliac crest blocks (an SFE simulated model). Primary stability was evaluated by using MIT and ISQ. RESULTS: The mean value of MIT for BLX group showed significantly higher values than SP, BL (p < 0.01), and TE (p < 0.05) groups. The mean value of ISQ for BLX group was significantly higher than the other groups (p < 0.01). The mean value of MIT and ISQ for BLX and BLX short group were significantly higher than those for SP and SP short group (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In an SFE simulated ex vivo model, BLX group showed the highest values. These results suggest that implant selection can play a crucial role in the achievement of primary stability during SFE and simultaneous implant placement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02345-5. BioMed Central 2022-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9361700/ /pubmed/35941575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02345-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Imai, Mikio
Ogino, Yoichiro
Tanaka, Hideaki
Koyano, Kiyoshi
Ayukawa, Yasunori
Toyoshima, Takeshi
Primary stability of different implant macrodesigns in a sinus floor elevation simulated model: an ex vivo study
title Primary stability of different implant macrodesigns in a sinus floor elevation simulated model: an ex vivo study
title_full Primary stability of different implant macrodesigns in a sinus floor elevation simulated model: an ex vivo study
title_fullStr Primary stability of different implant macrodesigns in a sinus floor elevation simulated model: an ex vivo study
title_full_unstemmed Primary stability of different implant macrodesigns in a sinus floor elevation simulated model: an ex vivo study
title_short Primary stability of different implant macrodesigns in a sinus floor elevation simulated model: an ex vivo study
title_sort primary stability of different implant macrodesigns in a sinus floor elevation simulated model: an ex vivo study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9361700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35941575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02345-5
work_keys_str_mv AT imaimikio primarystabilityofdifferentimplantmacrodesignsinasinusfloorelevationsimulatedmodelanexvivostudy
AT oginoyoichiro primarystabilityofdifferentimplantmacrodesignsinasinusfloorelevationsimulatedmodelanexvivostudy
AT tanakahideaki primarystabilityofdifferentimplantmacrodesignsinasinusfloorelevationsimulatedmodelanexvivostudy
AT koyanokiyoshi primarystabilityofdifferentimplantmacrodesignsinasinusfloorelevationsimulatedmodelanexvivostudy
AT ayukawayasunori primarystabilityofdifferentimplantmacrodesignsinasinusfloorelevationsimulatedmodelanexvivostudy
AT toyoshimatakeshi primarystabilityofdifferentimplantmacrodesignsinasinusfloorelevationsimulatedmodelanexvivostudy