Cargando…
Primary stability of different implant macrodesigns in a sinus floor elevation simulated model: an ex vivo study
BACKGROUND: A novel type of implant (Straumann® BLX implant) has been developed for certain stability from the mechanical and biological aspects and is expected for the implant placement in atrophic maxilla with sinus floor elevation (SFE). PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the primary...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9361700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35941575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02345-5 |
_version_ | 1784764582046203904 |
---|---|
author | Imai, Mikio Ogino, Yoichiro Tanaka, Hideaki Koyano, Kiyoshi Ayukawa, Yasunori Toyoshima, Takeshi |
author_facet | Imai, Mikio Ogino, Yoichiro Tanaka, Hideaki Koyano, Kiyoshi Ayukawa, Yasunori Toyoshima, Takeshi |
author_sort | Imai, Mikio |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A novel type of implant (Straumann® BLX implant) has been developed for certain stability from the mechanical and biological aspects and is expected for the implant placement in atrophic maxilla with sinus floor elevation (SFE). PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the primary stability in the implants with different macrodesigns in an SFE simulated model. Primary stabilities defined as maximum insertion torque (MIT) and implant stability quotient (ISQ) were compared between this novel type of implant and other types. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five types of Straumann® 10 mm length implants (Standard Plus; SP, Tapered Effect; TE, Bone Level; BL, Bone Level Tapered; BLT and BLX) and two types of Straumann® 6 mm length implants (SP short, BLX short) were used in this study. Each implant was inserted through 5 mm–thick porcine iliac crest blocks (an SFE simulated model). Primary stability was evaluated by using MIT and ISQ. RESULTS: The mean value of MIT for BLX group showed significantly higher values than SP, BL (p < 0.01), and TE (p < 0.05) groups. The mean value of ISQ for BLX group was significantly higher than the other groups (p < 0.01). The mean value of MIT and ISQ for BLX and BLX short group were significantly higher than those for SP and SP short group (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In an SFE simulated ex vivo model, BLX group showed the highest values. These results suggest that implant selection can play a crucial role in the achievement of primary stability during SFE and simultaneous implant placement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02345-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9361700 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93617002022-08-10 Primary stability of different implant macrodesigns in a sinus floor elevation simulated model: an ex vivo study Imai, Mikio Ogino, Yoichiro Tanaka, Hideaki Koyano, Kiyoshi Ayukawa, Yasunori Toyoshima, Takeshi BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: A novel type of implant (Straumann® BLX implant) has been developed for certain stability from the mechanical and biological aspects and is expected for the implant placement in atrophic maxilla with sinus floor elevation (SFE). PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the primary stability in the implants with different macrodesigns in an SFE simulated model. Primary stabilities defined as maximum insertion torque (MIT) and implant stability quotient (ISQ) were compared between this novel type of implant and other types. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five types of Straumann® 10 mm length implants (Standard Plus; SP, Tapered Effect; TE, Bone Level; BL, Bone Level Tapered; BLT and BLX) and two types of Straumann® 6 mm length implants (SP short, BLX short) were used in this study. Each implant was inserted through 5 mm–thick porcine iliac crest blocks (an SFE simulated model). Primary stability was evaluated by using MIT and ISQ. RESULTS: The mean value of MIT for BLX group showed significantly higher values than SP, BL (p < 0.01), and TE (p < 0.05) groups. The mean value of ISQ for BLX group was significantly higher than the other groups (p < 0.01). The mean value of MIT and ISQ for BLX and BLX short group were significantly higher than those for SP and SP short group (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In an SFE simulated ex vivo model, BLX group showed the highest values. These results suggest that implant selection can play a crucial role in the achievement of primary stability during SFE and simultaneous implant placement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02345-5. BioMed Central 2022-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9361700/ /pubmed/35941575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02345-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Imai, Mikio Ogino, Yoichiro Tanaka, Hideaki Koyano, Kiyoshi Ayukawa, Yasunori Toyoshima, Takeshi Primary stability of different implant macrodesigns in a sinus floor elevation simulated model: an ex vivo study |
title | Primary stability of different implant macrodesigns in a sinus floor elevation simulated model: an ex vivo study |
title_full | Primary stability of different implant macrodesigns in a sinus floor elevation simulated model: an ex vivo study |
title_fullStr | Primary stability of different implant macrodesigns in a sinus floor elevation simulated model: an ex vivo study |
title_full_unstemmed | Primary stability of different implant macrodesigns in a sinus floor elevation simulated model: an ex vivo study |
title_short | Primary stability of different implant macrodesigns in a sinus floor elevation simulated model: an ex vivo study |
title_sort | primary stability of different implant macrodesigns in a sinus floor elevation simulated model: an ex vivo study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9361700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35941575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02345-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT imaimikio primarystabilityofdifferentimplantmacrodesignsinasinusfloorelevationsimulatedmodelanexvivostudy AT oginoyoichiro primarystabilityofdifferentimplantmacrodesignsinasinusfloorelevationsimulatedmodelanexvivostudy AT tanakahideaki primarystabilityofdifferentimplantmacrodesignsinasinusfloorelevationsimulatedmodelanexvivostudy AT koyanokiyoshi primarystabilityofdifferentimplantmacrodesignsinasinusfloorelevationsimulatedmodelanexvivostudy AT ayukawayasunori primarystabilityofdifferentimplantmacrodesignsinasinusfloorelevationsimulatedmodelanexvivostudy AT toyoshimatakeshi primarystabilityofdifferentimplantmacrodesignsinasinusfloorelevationsimulatedmodelanexvivostudy |