Cargando…
Comparison and selection of patient follow-up systems for covid-19 pandemic patients
People have struggled with many infectious diseases throughout history. Today, the Covid-19 is being fought. One of the most important things for people who have or are at risk of getting Covid-19 is social isolation. Many countries resort to different ways to ensure social isolation. For this, remo...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Nature Singapore
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9361945/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40691-022-00296-7 |
_version_ | 1784764629562425344 |
---|---|
author | Eren, Tamer Danışan, Tuğba Deringöz, Ayşegül Aksüt, Güler |
author_facet | Eren, Tamer Danışan, Tuğba Deringöz, Ayşegül Aksüt, Güler |
author_sort | Eren, Tamer |
collection | PubMed |
description | People have struggled with many infectious diseases throughout history. Today, the Covid-19 is being fought. One of the most important things for people who have or are at risk of getting Covid-19 is social isolation. Many countries resort to different ways to ensure social isolation. For this, remote patient monitoring systems have been developed. In this study, the problem of the selection of Covid-19 remote patient monitoring systems is discussed. Seven Wearable Health Technology (WHT) products were evaluated with a total of 10 criteria, including the important symptoms used in the patient tracking systems. The weights of 10 criteria determined by the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method were calculated, and these weights were used in the solution of The Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE), and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solutions (TOPSIS) methods. WHT products were compared. As a result, the most appropriate patient follow-up system was determined. This study generates differences in terms of evaluating seven different products and ten criteria in total with MCDM methods. A more comprehensive evaluation has been made in the literature than the studies in this field. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9361945 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Nature Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93619452022-08-10 Comparison and selection of patient follow-up systems for covid-19 pandemic patients Eren, Tamer Danışan, Tuğba Deringöz, Ayşegül Aksüt, Güler Fash Text Research People have struggled with many infectious diseases throughout history. Today, the Covid-19 is being fought. One of the most important things for people who have or are at risk of getting Covid-19 is social isolation. Many countries resort to different ways to ensure social isolation. For this, remote patient monitoring systems have been developed. In this study, the problem of the selection of Covid-19 remote patient monitoring systems is discussed. Seven Wearable Health Technology (WHT) products were evaluated with a total of 10 criteria, including the important symptoms used in the patient tracking systems. The weights of 10 criteria determined by the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method were calculated, and these weights were used in the solution of The Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE), and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solutions (TOPSIS) methods. WHT products were compared. As a result, the most appropriate patient follow-up system was determined. This study generates differences in terms of evaluating seven different products and ten criteria in total with MCDM methods. A more comprehensive evaluation has been made in the literature than the studies in this field. Springer Nature Singapore 2022-08-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9361945/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40691-022-00296-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Eren, Tamer Danışan, Tuğba Deringöz, Ayşegül Aksüt, Güler Comparison and selection of patient follow-up systems for covid-19 pandemic patients |
title | Comparison and selection of patient follow-up systems for covid-19 pandemic patients |
title_full | Comparison and selection of patient follow-up systems for covid-19 pandemic patients |
title_fullStr | Comparison and selection of patient follow-up systems for covid-19 pandemic patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison and selection of patient follow-up systems for covid-19 pandemic patients |
title_short | Comparison and selection of patient follow-up systems for covid-19 pandemic patients |
title_sort | comparison and selection of patient follow-up systems for covid-19 pandemic patients |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9361945/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40691-022-00296-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT erentamer comparisonandselectionofpatientfollowupsystemsforcovid19pandemicpatients AT danısantugba comparisonandselectionofpatientfollowupsystemsforcovid19pandemicpatients AT deringozaysegul comparisonandselectionofpatientfollowupsystemsforcovid19pandemicpatients AT aksutguler comparisonandselectionofpatientfollowupsystemsforcovid19pandemicpatients |