Cargando…

Acceptability of a companion patient guide to support expert consensus guidelines on surveillance mammography in older breast cancer survivors

PURPOSE: To support shared decision-making, patient-facing resources are needed to complement recently published guidelines on approaches for surveillance mammography in breast cancer survivors aged ≥ 75 or with < 10-year life expectancy. We created a patient guide to facilitate discussions about...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freedman, Rachel A., Revette, Anna C., Gagnon, Haley, Perilla-Glen, Adriana, Kokoski, Molly, Hussein, Saida O., Leone, Erin, Hixon, Nicole, Lovato, Rebeka, Loeser, Wendy, Lin, Nancy U., Minami, Christina A., Canin, Beverly, LeStage, Barbara, Faggen, Meredith, Poorvu, Philip D., McKenna, Jennifer, Ruddy, Kathryn J., Keating, Nancy L., Schonberg, Mara A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9362353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35908120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06676-3
_version_ 1784764708940677120
author Freedman, Rachel A.
Revette, Anna C.
Gagnon, Haley
Perilla-Glen, Adriana
Kokoski, Molly
Hussein, Saida O.
Leone, Erin
Hixon, Nicole
Lovato, Rebeka
Loeser, Wendy
Lin, Nancy U.
Minami, Christina A.
Canin, Beverly
LeStage, Barbara
Faggen, Meredith
Poorvu, Philip D.
McKenna, Jennifer
Ruddy, Kathryn J.
Keating, Nancy L.
Schonberg, Mara A.
author_facet Freedman, Rachel A.
Revette, Anna C.
Gagnon, Haley
Perilla-Glen, Adriana
Kokoski, Molly
Hussein, Saida O.
Leone, Erin
Hixon, Nicole
Lovato, Rebeka
Loeser, Wendy
Lin, Nancy U.
Minami, Christina A.
Canin, Beverly
LeStage, Barbara
Faggen, Meredith
Poorvu, Philip D.
McKenna, Jennifer
Ruddy, Kathryn J.
Keating, Nancy L.
Schonberg, Mara A.
author_sort Freedman, Rachel A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To support shared decision-making, patient-facing resources are needed to complement recently published guidelines on approaches for surveillance mammography in breast cancer survivors aged ≥ 75 or with < 10-year life expectancy. We created a patient guide to facilitate discussions about surveillance mammography in older breast cancer survivors. METHODS: The “Are Mammograms Still Right for Me?” guide estimates future ipsilateral and contralateral breast (in-breast) cancer risks, general health, and the potential benefits/harms of mammography, with prompts for discussion. We conducted in-clinic acceptability testing of the guide by survivors and their clinicians at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center, including two community practices. Patients and clinicians received the guide ahead of a clinic visit and surveyed patients (pre-/post-visit) and clinicians (post-visit). Acceptability was defined as ≥ 75% of patients and clinicians reporting that the guide (a) should be recommended to others, (b) is clear, (c) is helpful, and (d) contains a suitable amount of information. We also elicited feedback on usability and mammography intentions. RESULTS: We enrolled 45 patients and their 21 clinicians. Among those responding in post-visit surveys, 33/37 (89%) patients and 15/16 (94%) clinicians would recommend the guide to others; 33/37 (89%) patients and 15/16 (94%) clinicians felt everything/most things were clear. All other pre-specified acceptability criteria were met. Most patients reported strong intentions for mammography (100% pre-visit, 98% post-visit). CONCLUSION: Oncology clinicians and older breast cancer survivors found a guide to inform mammography decision-making acceptable and clear. A multisite clinical trial is needed to assess the guide’s impact mammography utilization. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT03865654, posted March 7, 2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-022-06676-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9362353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93623532022-08-10 Acceptability of a companion patient guide to support expert consensus guidelines on surveillance mammography in older breast cancer survivors Freedman, Rachel A. Revette, Anna C. Gagnon, Haley Perilla-Glen, Adriana Kokoski, Molly Hussein, Saida O. Leone, Erin Hixon, Nicole Lovato, Rebeka Loeser, Wendy Lin, Nancy U. Minami, Christina A. Canin, Beverly LeStage, Barbara Faggen, Meredith Poorvu, Philip D. McKenna, Jennifer Ruddy, Kathryn J. Keating, Nancy L. Schonberg, Mara A. Breast Cancer Res Treat Clinical Trial PURPOSE: To support shared decision-making, patient-facing resources are needed to complement recently published guidelines on approaches for surveillance mammography in breast cancer survivors aged ≥ 75 or with < 10-year life expectancy. We created a patient guide to facilitate discussions about surveillance mammography in older breast cancer survivors. METHODS: The “Are Mammograms Still Right for Me?” guide estimates future ipsilateral and contralateral breast (in-breast) cancer risks, general health, and the potential benefits/harms of mammography, with prompts for discussion. We conducted in-clinic acceptability testing of the guide by survivors and their clinicians at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center, including two community practices. Patients and clinicians received the guide ahead of a clinic visit and surveyed patients (pre-/post-visit) and clinicians (post-visit). Acceptability was defined as ≥ 75% of patients and clinicians reporting that the guide (a) should be recommended to others, (b) is clear, (c) is helpful, and (d) contains a suitable amount of information. We also elicited feedback on usability and mammography intentions. RESULTS: We enrolled 45 patients and their 21 clinicians. Among those responding in post-visit surveys, 33/37 (89%) patients and 15/16 (94%) clinicians would recommend the guide to others; 33/37 (89%) patients and 15/16 (94%) clinicians felt everything/most things were clear. All other pre-specified acceptability criteria were met. Most patients reported strong intentions for mammography (100% pre-visit, 98% post-visit). CONCLUSION: Oncology clinicians and older breast cancer survivors found a guide to inform mammography decision-making acceptable and clear. A multisite clinical trial is needed to assess the guide’s impact mammography utilization. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT03865654, posted March 7, 2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-022-06676-3. Springer US 2022-07-30 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9362353/ /pubmed/35908120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06676-3 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Clinical Trial
Freedman, Rachel A.
Revette, Anna C.
Gagnon, Haley
Perilla-Glen, Adriana
Kokoski, Molly
Hussein, Saida O.
Leone, Erin
Hixon, Nicole
Lovato, Rebeka
Loeser, Wendy
Lin, Nancy U.
Minami, Christina A.
Canin, Beverly
LeStage, Barbara
Faggen, Meredith
Poorvu, Philip D.
McKenna, Jennifer
Ruddy, Kathryn J.
Keating, Nancy L.
Schonberg, Mara A.
Acceptability of a companion patient guide to support expert consensus guidelines on surveillance mammography in older breast cancer survivors
title Acceptability of a companion patient guide to support expert consensus guidelines on surveillance mammography in older breast cancer survivors
title_full Acceptability of a companion patient guide to support expert consensus guidelines on surveillance mammography in older breast cancer survivors
title_fullStr Acceptability of a companion patient guide to support expert consensus guidelines on surveillance mammography in older breast cancer survivors
title_full_unstemmed Acceptability of a companion patient guide to support expert consensus guidelines on surveillance mammography in older breast cancer survivors
title_short Acceptability of a companion patient guide to support expert consensus guidelines on surveillance mammography in older breast cancer survivors
title_sort acceptability of a companion patient guide to support expert consensus guidelines on surveillance mammography in older breast cancer survivors
topic Clinical Trial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9362353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35908120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06676-3
work_keys_str_mv AT freedmanrachela acceptabilityofacompanionpatientguidetosupportexpertconsensusguidelinesonsurveillancemammographyinolderbreastcancersurvivors
AT revetteannac acceptabilityofacompanionpatientguidetosupportexpertconsensusguidelinesonsurveillancemammographyinolderbreastcancersurvivors
AT gagnonhaley acceptabilityofacompanionpatientguidetosupportexpertconsensusguidelinesonsurveillancemammographyinolderbreastcancersurvivors
AT perillaglenadriana acceptabilityofacompanionpatientguidetosupportexpertconsensusguidelinesonsurveillancemammographyinolderbreastcancersurvivors
AT kokoskimolly acceptabilityofacompanionpatientguidetosupportexpertconsensusguidelinesonsurveillancemammographyinolderbreastcancersurvivors
AT husseinsaidao acceptabilityofacompanionpatientguidetosupportexpertconsensusguidelinesonsurveillancemammographyinolderbreastcancersurvivors
AT leoneerin acceptabilityofacompanionpatientguidetosupportexpertconsensusguidelinesonsurveillancemammographyinolderbreastcancersurvivors
AT hixonnicole acceptabilityofacompanionpatientguidetosupportexpertconsensusguidelinesonsurveillancemammographyinolderbreastcancersurvivors
AT lovatorebeka acceptabilityofacompanionpatientguidetosupportexpertconsensusguidelinesonsurveillancemammographyinolderbreastcancersurvivors
AT loeserwendy acceptabilityofacompanionpatientguidetosupportexpertconsensusguidelinesonsurveillancemammographyinolderbreastcancersurvivors
AT linnancyu acceptabilityofacompanionpatientguidetosupportexpertconsensusguidelinesonsurveillancemammographyinolderbreastcancersurvivors
AT minamichristinaa acceptabilityofacompanionpatientguidetosupportexpertconsensusguidelinesonsurveillancemammographyinolderbreastcancersurvivors
AT caninbeverly acceptabilityofacompanionpatientguidetosupportexpertconsensusguidelinesonsurveillancemammographyinolderbreastcancersurvivors
AT lestagebarbara acceptabilityofacompanionpatientguidetosupportexpertconsensusguidelinesonsurveillancemammographyinolderbreastcancersurvivors
AT faggenmeredith acceptabilityofacompanionpatientguidetosupportexpertconsensusguidelinesonsurveillancemammographyinolderbreastcancersurvivors
AT poorvuphilipd acceptabilityofacompanionpatientguidetosupportexpertconsensusguidelinesonsurveillancemammographyinolderbreastcancersurvivors
AT mckennajennifer acceptabilityofacompanionpatientguidetosupportexpertconsensusguidelinesonsurveillancemammographyinolderbreastcancersurvivors
AT ruddykathrynj acceptabilityofacompanionpatientguidetosupportexpertconsensusguidelinesonsurveillancemammographyinolderbreastcancersurvivors
AT keatingnancyl acceptabilityofacompanionpatientguidetosupportexpertconsensusguidelinesonsurveillancemammographyinolderbreastcancersurvivors
AT schonbergmaraa acceptabilityofacompanionpatientguidetosupportexpertconsensusguidelinesonsurveillancemammographyinolderbreastcancersurvivors