Cargando…

Shame as a geophilosophical force

In this article, I argue that Deleuze and Guattari’s famous trope about “an earth and a people that are lacking” in the Geophilosophy chapter of What Is Philosophy? must be examined through a specific assemblage: the necessity for shame—as a powerful, non-psychological, and nonhuman affect—to enter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Wiame, Aline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Palgrave Macmillan UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9362531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41286-022-00133-8
_version_ 1784764740729307136
author Wiame, Aline
author_facet Wiame, Aline
author_sort Wiame, Aline
collection PubMed
description In this article, I argue that Deleuze and Guattari’s famous trope about “an earth and a people that are lacking” in the Geophilosophy chapter of What Is Philosophy? must be examined through a specific assemblage: the necessity for shame—as a powerful, non-psychological, and nonhuman affect—to enter philosophy itself both to resist stupidity and to include all the disfranchised of classical Reason. I then turn to Isabelle Stengers’ work against stupidity to determine how this assemblage can help us give shape to new multispecies apparatuses in the face of the Anthropocene. As a conclusion, I show that, through such apparatuses, shame truly becomes a geophilosophical force.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9362531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Palgrave Macmillan UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93625312022-08-10 Shame as a geophilosophical force Wiame, Aline Subjectivity Original Article In this article, I argue that Deleuze and Guattari’s famous trope about “an earth and a people that are lacking” in the Geophilosophy chapter of What Is Philosophy? must be examined through a specific assemblage: the necessity for shame—as a powerful, non-psychological, and nonhuman affect—to enter philosophy itself both to resist stupidity and to include all the disfranchised of classical Reason. I then turn to Isabelle Stengers’ work against stupidity to determine how this assemblage can help us give shape to new multispecies apparatuses in the face of the Anthropocene. As a conclusion, I show that, through such apparatuses, shame truly becomes a geophilosophical force. Palgrave Macmillan UK 2022-08-04 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9362531/ /pubmed/35966799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41286-022-00133-8 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Wiame, Aline
Shame as a geophilosophical force
title Shame as a geophilosophical force
title_full Shame as a geophilosophical force
title_fullStr Shame as a geophilosophical force
title_full_unstemmed Shame as a geophilosophical force
title_short Shame as a geophilosophical force
title_sort shame as a geophilosophical force
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9362531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41286-022-00133-8
work_keys_str_mv AT wiamealine shameasageophilosophicalforce