Cargando…

Quality and safety indicators for home care recipients in Australia: development and cross-sectional analyses

OBJECTIVES: To develop and examine the prevalence of quality and safety indicators to monitor care of older Australians receiving home care packages (HCPs), a government-funded aged care programme to support individuals to live at home independently. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Home care recip...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caughey, Gillian Elizabeth, Lang, Catherine E, Bray, Sarah Catherine Elizabeth, Sluggett, Janet K, Whitehead, Craig, Visvanathan, Renuka, Evans, Keith, Corlis, Megan, Cornell, Victoria, Barker, Anna L, Wesselingh, Steve, Inacio, Maria C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9362790/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063152
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To develop and examine the prevalence of quality and safety indicators to monitor care of older Australians receiving home care packages (HCPs), a government-funded aged care programme to support individuals to live at home independently. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Home care recipients, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 90 650 older individuals (aged ≥65 years old and ≥50 years old for people of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent) who received a HCP between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2016 nationally were included. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The Registry of Senior Australians developed 15 quality and safety indicators: antipsychotic use, high sedative load, chronic opioid use, antimicrobial use, premature mortality, home medicines reviews, chronic disease management plan, wait-time for HCP, falls, fractures, medication-related adverse events, weight loss/malnutrition, delirium/dementia-related hospitalisations, emergency department (ED) presentations and pressure injuries. Risk adjusted prevalence (%, 95% CI) and geographical area (statistical level 3) variation during 2016 were examined. RESULTS: In 2016, a total of 102 590 HCP episodes were included for 90 650 individuals, with 66.9% (n=68 598) level 1–2 HCP episodes (ie, for basic care needs) and 33.1% (n=33 992) level 3–4 HCP (ie, higher care needs). The most prevalent indicators included: antibiotic use (52.4%, 95% CI 52.0 to 52.7), chronic disease management plans (38.1%, 95% CI 37.8 to 38.4), high sedative load (29.1%, 95% CI 28.8 to 29.4) and ED presentations (26.4%, 95% CI 25.9 to 26.9). HCP median wait time was 134 days (IQR 41–406). Geographical variation was highest in chronic disease management plans and ED presentations (20.7% of areas outside expected range). CONCLUSION: A comprehensive outcome monitoring system to monitor the quality and safety of care and variation for HCP recipients was developed. It provides a pragmatic, efficient and low burden tool to support evidence-based quality and safety improvement initiatives for the aged care sector.