Cargando…

Quality and safety indicators for home care recipients in Australia: development and cross-sectional analyses

OBJECTIVES: To develop and examine the prevalence of quality and safety indicators to monitor care of older Australians receiving home care packages (HCPs), a government-funded aged care programme to support individuals to live at home independently. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Home care recip...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caughey, Gillian Elizabeth, Lang, Catherine E, Bray, Sarah Catherine Elizabeth, Sluggett, Janet K, Whitehead, Craig, Visvanathan, Renuka, Evans, Keith, Corlis, Megan, Cornell, Victoria, Barker, Anna L, Wesselingh, Steve, Inacio, Maria C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9362790/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063152
_version_ 1784764789395816448
author Caughey, Gillian Elizabeth
Lang, Catherine E
Bray, Sarah Catherine Elizabeth
Sluggett, Janet K
Whitehead, Craig
Visvanathan, Renuka
Evans, Keith
Corlis, Megan
Cornell, Victoria
Barker, Anna L
Wesselingh, Steve
Inacio, Maria C
author_facet Caughey, Gillian Elizabeth
Lang, Catherine E
Bray, Sarah Catherine Elizabeth
Sluggett, Janet K
Whitehead, Craig
Visvanathan, Renuka
Evans, Keith
Corlis, Megan
Cornell, Victoria
Barker, Anna L
Wesselingh, Steve
Inacio, Maria C
author_sort Caughey, Gillian Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To develop and examine the prevalence of quality and safety indicators to monitor care of older Australians receiving home care packages (HCPs), a government-funded aged care programme to support individuals to live at home independently. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Home care recipients, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 90 650 older individuals (aged ≥65 years old and ≥50 years old for people of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent) who received a HCP between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2016 nationally were included. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The Registry of Senior Australians developed 15 quality and safety indicators: antipsychotic use, high sedative load, chronic opioid use, antimicrobial use, premature mortality, home medicines reviews, chronic disease management plan, wait-time for HCP, falls, fractures, medication-related adverse events, weight loss/malnutrition, delirium/dementia-related hospitalisations, emergency department (ED) presentations and pressure injuries. Risk adjusted prevalence (%, 95% CI) and geographical area (statistical level 3) variation during 2016 were examined. RESULTS: In 2016, a total of 102 590 HCP episodes were included for 90 650 individuals, with 66.9% (n=68 598) level 1–2 HCP episodes (ie, for basic care needs) and 33.1% (n=33 992) level 3–4 HCP (ie, higher care needs). The most prevalent indicators included: antibiotic use (52.4%, 95% CI 52.0 to 52.7), chronic disease management plans (38.1%, 95% CI 37.8 to 38.4), high sedative load (29.1%, 95% CI 28.8 to 29.4) and ED presentations (26.4%, 95% CI 25.9 to 26.9). HCP median wait time was 134 days (IQR 41–406). Geographical variation was highest in chronic disease management plans and ED presentations (20.7% of areas outside expected range). CONCLUSION: A comprehensive outcome monitoring system to monitor the quality and safety of care and variation for HCP recipients was developed. It provides a pragmatic, efficient and low burden tool to support evidence-based quality and safety improvement initiatives for the aged care sector.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9362790
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93627902022-08-22 Quality and safety indicators for home care recipients in Australia: development and cross-sectional analyses Caughey, Gillian Elizabeth Lang, Catherine E Bray, Sarah Catherine Elizabeth Sluggett, Janet K Whitehead, Craig Visvanathan, Renuka Evans, Keith Corlis, Megan Cornell, Victoria Barker, Anna L Wesselingh, Steve Inacio, Maria C BMJ Open Geriatric Medicine OBJECTIVES: To develop and examine the prevalence of quality and safety indicators to monitor care of older Australians receiving home care packages (HCPs), a government-funded aged care programme to support individuals to live at home independently. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Home care recipients, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 90 650 older individuals (aged ≥65 years old and ≥50 years old for people of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent) who received a HCP between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2016 nationally were included. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The Registry of Senior Australians developed 15 quality and safety indicators: antipsychotic use, high sedative load, chronic opioid use, antimicrobial use, premature mortality, home medicines reviews, chronic disease management plan, wait-time for HCP, falls, fractures, medication-related adverse events, weight loss/malnutrition, delirium/dementia-related hospitalisations, emergency department (ED) presentations and pressure injuries. Risk adjusted prevalence (%, 95% CI) and geographical area (statistical level 3) variation during 2016 were examined. RESULTS: In 2016, a total of 102 590 HCP episodes were included for 90 650 individuals, with 66.9% (n=68 598) level 1–2 HCP episodes (ie, for basic care needs) and 33.1% (n=33 992) level 3–4 HCP (ie, higher care needs). The most prevalent indicators included: antibiotic use (52.4%, 95% CI 52.0 to 52.7), chronic disease management plans (38.1%, 95% CI 37.8 to 38.4), high sedative load (29.1%, 95% CI 28.8 to 29.4) and ED presentations (26.4%, 95% CI 25.9 to 26.9). HCP median wait time was 134 days (IQR 41–406). Geographical variation was highest in chronic disease management plans and ED presentations (20.7% of areas outside expected range). CONCLUSION: A comprehensive outcome monitoring system to monitor the quality and safety of care and variation for HCP recipients was developed. It provides a pragmatic, efficient and low burden tool to support evidence-based quality and safety improvement initiatives for the aged care sector. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9362790/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063152 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Geriatric Medicine
Caughey, Gillian Elizabeth
Lang, Catherine E
Bray, Sarah Catherine Elizabeth
Sluggett, Janet K
Whitehead, Craig
Visvanathan, Renuka
Evans, Keith
Corlis, Megan
Cornell, Victoria
Barker, Anna L
Wesselingh, Steve
Inacio, Maria C
Quality and safety indicators for home care recipients in Australia: development and cross-sectional analyses
title Quality and safety indicators for home care recipients in Australia: development and cross-sectional analyses
title_full Quality and safety indicators for home care recipients in Australia: development and cross-sectional analyses
title_fullStr Quality and safety indicators for home care recipients in Australia: development and cross-sectional analyses
title_full_unstemmed Quality and safety indicators for home care recipients in Australia: development and cross-sectional analyses
title_short Quality and safety indicators for home care recipients in Australia: development and cross-sectional analyses
title_sort quality and safety indicators for home care recipients in australia: development and cross-sectional analyses
topic Geriatric Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9362790/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063152
work_keys_str_mv AT caugheygillianelizabeth qualityandsafetyindicatorsforhomecarerecipientsinaustraliadevelopmentandcrosssectionalanalyses
AT langcatherinee qualityandsafetyindicatorsforhomecarerecipientsinaustraliadevelopmentandcrosssectionalanalyses
AT braysarahcatherineelizabeth qualityandsafetyindicatorsforhomecarerecipientsinaustraliadevelopmentandcrosssectionalanalyses
AT sluggettjanetk qualityandsafetyindicatorsforhomecarerecipientsinaustraliadevelopmentandcrosssectionalanalyses
AT whiteheadcraig qualityandsafetyindicatorsforhomecarerecipientsinaustraliadevelopmentandcrosssectionalanalyses
AT visvanathanrenuka qualityandsafetyindicatorsforhomecarerecipientsinaustraliadevelopmentandcrosssectionalanalyses
AT evanskeith qualityandsafetyindicatorsforhomecarerecipientsinaustraliadevelopmentandcrosssectionalanalyses
AT corlismegan qualityandsafetyindicatorsforhomecarerecipientsinaustraliadevelopmentandcrosssectionalanalyses
AT cornellvictoria qualityandsafetyindicatorsforhomecarerecipientsinaustraliadevelopmentandcrosssectionalanalyses
AT barkerannal qualityandsafetyindicatorsforhomecarerecipientsinaustraliadevelopmentandcrosssectionalanalyses
AT wesselinghsteve qualityandsafetyindicatorsforhomecarerecipientsinaustraliadevelopmentandcrosssectionalanalyses
AT inaciomariac qualityandsafetyindicatorsforhomecarerecipientsinaustraliadevelopmentandcrosssectionalanalyses