Cargando…

Successful management of gingival recession with interdental attachment loss using gingival unit grafts

BACKGROUND: Gingival recession leads to root surface exposure devoid of periodontal attachment. Recession defects with interdental attachment loss (RT2, RT3), further increase the avascular area which is critical for survival of soft-tissue grafts. Nonsubmerged grafts such as free gingival grafts an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Katti, Neelima, Mohanty, Devapratim, Agrawal, Poonam, Raj, Subash Chandra, Pradhan, Shib Shankar, Baral, Debjani
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9362813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35959310
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_539_21
_version_ 1784764795327610880
author Katti, Neelima
Mohanty, Devapratim
Agrawal, Poonam
Raj, Subash Chandra
Pradhan, Shib Shankar
Baral, Debjani
author_facet Katti, Neelima
Mohanty, Devapratim
Agrawal, Poonam
Raj, Subash Chandra
Pradhan, Shib Shankar
Baral, Debjani
author_sort Katti, Neelima
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gingival recession leads to root surface exposure devoid of periodontal attachment. Recession defects with interdental attachment loss (RT2, RT3), further increase the avascular area which is critical for survival of soft-tissue grafts. Nonsubmerged grafts such as free gingival grafts and gingival unit grafts (GUGs) rely primarily on plasmatic circulation from the recipient area during the initial stages of healing for its survival. METHODS: Nineteen isolated RT2 recession defects, in the mandibular anterior region, were treated using GUG. The clinical parameters of recession depth (RD), recession width (RW), interdental clinical attachment levels (iCAL) were measured at baseline. Percentage of mean root coverage (MRC) was calculated at 3 months and 6 months. RESULTS: The percentage of mean root coverage (MRC) achieved at the end of 6 months was 81.79% ± 6.16%. Further, Simple linear regression analysis to predict MRC at 6 months using baseline RW revealed, for every 1 mm decrease in RW, the percentage of root coverage significantly increased by 5.25% (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: GUG can be used as an alternative treatment modality to achieve successful root coverage in RT2 recession defects. Baseline RW can be used to predict the outcome of root coverage at the end of 6 months.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9362813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93628132022-08-10 Successful management of gingival recession with interdental attachment loss using gingival unit grafts Katti, Neelima Mohanty, Devapratim Agrawal, Poonam Raj, Subash Chandra Pradhan, Shib Shankar Baral, Debjani J Indian Soc Periodontol Original Article BACKGROUND: Gingival recession leads to root surface exposure devoid of periodontal attachment. Recession defects with interdental attachment loss (RT2, RT3), further increase the avascular area which is critical for survival of soft-tissue grafts. Nonsubmerged grafts such as free gingival grafts and gingival unit grafts (GUGs) rely primarily on plasmatic circulation from the recipient area during the initial stages of healing for its survival. METHODS: Nineteen isolated RT2 recession defects, in the mandibular anterior region, were treated using GUG. The clinical parameters of recession depth (RD), recession width (RW), interdental clinical attachment levels (iCAL) were measured at baseline. Percentage of mean root coverage (MRC) was calculated at 3 months and 6 months. RESULTS: The percentage of mean root coverage (MRC) achieved at the end of 6 months was 81.79% ± 6.16%. Further, Simple linear regression analysis to predict MRC at 6 months using baseline RW revealed, for every 1 mm decrease in RW, the percentage of root coverage significantly increased by 5.25% (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: GUG can be used as an alternative treatment modality to achieve successful root coverage in RT2 recession defects. Baseline RW can be used to predict the outcome of root coverage at the end of 6 months. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9362813/ /pubmed/35959310 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_539_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Society of Periodontology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Katti, Neelima
Mohanty, Devapratim
Agrawal, Poonam
Raj, Subash Chandra
Pradhan, Shib Shankar
Baral, Debjani
Successful management of gingival recession with interdental attachment loss using gingival unit grafts
title Successful management of gingival recession with interdental attachment loss using gingival unit grafts
title_full Successful management of gingival recession with interdental attachment loss using gingival unit grafts
title_fullStr Successful management of gingival recession with interdental attachment loss using gingival unit grafts
title_full_unstemmed Successful management of gingival recession with interdental attachment loss using gingival unit grafts
title_short Successful management of gingival recession with interdental attachment loss using gingival unit grafts
title_sort successful management of gingival recession with interdental attachment loss using gingival unit grafts
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9362813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35959310
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_539_21
work_keys_str_mv AT kattineelima successfulmanagementofgingivalrecessionwithinterdentalattachmentlossusinggingivalunitgrafts
AT mohantydevapratim successfulmanagementofgingivalrecessionwithinterdentalattachmentlossusinggingivalunitgrafts
AT agrawalpoonam successfulmanagementofgingivalrecessionwithinterdentalattachmentlossusinggingivalunitgrafts
AT rajsubashchandra successfulmanagementofgingivalrecessionwithinterdentalattachmentlossusinggingivalunitgrafts
AT pradhanshibshankar successfulmanagementofgingivalrecessionwithinterdentalattachmentlossusinggingivalunitgrafts
AT baraldebjani successfulmanagementofgingivalrecessionwithinterdentalattachmentlossusinggingivalunitgrafts