Cargando…

The effect of visually manipulating back size and morphology on back perception, body ownership, and attitudes towards self-capacity during a lifting task

Body re-sizing illusions can profoundly alter perception of our own body. We investigated whether creating the illusion of a muscled and fit-looking back (Strong) influenced perceived back size, body ownership, and attitudes towards self-capacity during a lifting task. Twenty-four healthy male volun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Themelis, Kristy, Ratcliffe, Natasha, Nishigami, Tomohiko, Wand, Benedict M., Newport, Roger, Stanton, Tasha R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9363286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34727227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01609-z
_version_ 1784764897040531456
author Themelis, Kristy
Ratcliffe, Natasha
Nishigami, Tomohiko
Wand, Benedict M.
Newport, Roger
Stanton, Tasha R.
author_facet Themelis, Kristy
Ratcliffe, Natasha
Nishigami, Tomohiko
Wand, Benedict M.
Newport, Roger
Stanton, Tasha R.
author_sort Themelis, Kristy
collection PubMed
description Body re-sizing illusions can profoundly alter perception of our own body. We investigated whether creating the illusion of a muscled and fit-looking back (Strong) influenced perceived back size, body ownership, and attitudes towards self-capacity during a lifting task. Twenty-four healthy male volunteers performed a standardised lifting task while viewing real-time (delay < 20 ms) video of their own back through a head-mounted display under four different conditions (Normal size, Strong, Reshaped, Large; order randomised). The MIRAGE-mediated reality system was used to modify the shape, size, and morphology of the back. Participants were poor at recognizing the correct appearance of their back, for both implicit (perceived width of shoulders and hips) and explicit (questionnaire) measures of back size. Visual distortions of body shape (Reshaped condition) altered implicit back size measures. However, viewing a muscled back (Strong condition) did not result in a sense of agency or ownership and did not update implicit perception of the back. No conditions improved perceptions/attitudes of self-capacity (perceived back strength, perceived lifting confidence, and perceived back fitness). The results lend support for the importance of the embodiment of bodily changes to induce changes in perception. Further work is warranted to determine whether increased exposure to illusory changes would alter perceptions and attitudes towards self-capacity or whether different mechanisms are involved. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00426-021-01609-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9363286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93632862022-08-11 The effect of visually manipulating back size and morphology on back perception, body ownership, and attitudes towards self-capacity during a lifting task Themelis, Kristy Ratcliffe, Natasha Nishigami, Tomohiko Wand, Benedict M. Newport, Roger Stanton, Tasha R. Psychol Res Original Article Body re-sizing illusions can profoundly alter perception of our own body. We investigated whether creating the illusion of a muscled and fit-looking back (Strong) influenced perceived back size, body ownership, and attitudes towards self-capacity during a lifting task. Twenty-four healthy male volunteers performed a standardised lifting task while viewing real-time (delay < 20 ms) video of their own back through a head-mounted display under four different conditions (Normal size, Strong, Reshaped, Large; order randomised). The MIRAGE-mediated reality system was used to modify the shape, size, and morphology of the back. Participants were poor at recognizing the correct appearance of their back, for both implicit (perceived width of shoulders and hips) and explicit (questionnaire) measures of back size. Visual distortions of body shape (Reshaped condition) altered implicit back size measures. However, viewing a muscled back (Strong condition) did not result in a sense of agency or ownership and did not update implicit perception of the back. No conditions improved perceptions/attitudes of self-capacity (perceived back strength, perceived lifting confidence, and perceived back fitness). The results lend support for the importance of the embodiment of bodily changes to induce changes in perception. Further work is warranted to determine whether increased exposure to illusory changes would alter perceptions and attitudes towards self-capacity or whether different mechanisms are involved. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00426-021-01609-z. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-11-02 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9363286/ /pubmed/34727227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01609-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Themelis, Kristy
Ratcliffe, Natasha
Nishigami, Tomohiko
Wand, Benedict M.
Newport, Roger
Stanton, Tasha R.
The effect of visually manipulating back size and morphology on back perception, body ownership, and attitudes towards self-capacity during a lifting task
title The effect of visually manipulating back size and morphology on back perception, body ownership, and attitudes towards self-capacity during a lifting task
title_full The effect of visually manipulating back size and morphology on back perception, body ownership, and attitudes towards self-capacity during a lifting task
title_fullStr The effect of visually manipulating back size and morphology on back perception, body ownership, and attitudes towards self-capacity during a lifting task
title_full_unstemmed The effect of visually manipulating back size and morphology on back perception, body ownership, and attitudes towards self-capacity during a lifting task
title_short The effect of visually manipulating back size and morphology on back perception, body ownership, and attitudes towards self-capacity during a lifting task
title_sort effect of visually manipulating back size and morphology on back perception, body ownership, and attitudes towards self-capacity during a lifting task
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9363286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34727227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01609-z
work_keys_str_mv AT themeliskristy theeffectofvisuallymanipulatingbacksizeandmorphologyonbackperceptionbodyownershipandattitudestowardsselfcapacityduringaliftingtask
AT ratcliffenatasha theeffectofvisuallymanipulatingbacksizeandmorphologyonbackperceptionbodyownershipandattitudestowardsselfcapacityduringaliftingtask
AT nishigamitomohiko theeffectofvisuallymanipulatingbacksizeandmorphologyonbackperceptionbodyownershipandattitudestowardsselfcapacityduringaliftingtask
AT wandbenedictm theeffectofvisuallymanipulatingbacksizeandmorphologyonbackperceptionbodyownershipandattitudestowardsselfcapacityduringaliftingtask
AT newportroger theeffectofvisuallymanipulatingbacksizeandmorphologyonbackperceptionbodyownershipandattitudestowardsselfcapacityduringaliftingtask
AT stantontashar theeffectofvisuallymanipulatingbacksizeandmorphologyonbackperceptionbodyownershipandattitudestowardsselfcapacityduringaliftingtask
AT themeliskristy effectofvisuallymanipulatingbacksizeandmorphologyonbackperceptionbodyownershipandattitudestowardsselfcapacityduringaliftingtask
AT ratcliffenatasha effectofvisuallymanipulatingbacksizeandmorphologyonbackperceptionbodyownershipandattitudestowardsselfcapacityduringaliftingtask
AT nishigamitomohiko effectofvisuallymanipulatingbacksizeandmorphologyonbackperceptionbodyownershipandattitudestowardsselfcapacityduringaliftingtask
AT wandbenedictm effectofvisuallymanipulatingbacksizeandmorphologyonbackperceptionbodyownershipandattitudestowardsselfcapacityduringaliftingtask
AT newportroger effectofvisuallymanipulatingbacksizeandmorphologyonbackperceptionbodyownershipandattitudestowardsselfcapacityduringaliftingtask
AT stantontashar effectofvisuallymanipulatingbacksizeandmorphologyonbackperceptionbodyownershipandattitudestowardsselfcapacityduringaliftingtask