Cargando…
The effect of visually manipulating back size and morphology on back perception, body ownership, and attitudes towards self-capacity during a lifting task
Body re-sizing illusions can profoundly alter perception of our own body. We investigated whether creating the illusion of a muscled and fit-looking back (Strong) influenced perceived back size, body ownership, and attitudes towards self-capacity during a lifting task. Twenty-four healthy male volun...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9363286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34727227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01609-z |
_version_ | 1784764897040531456 |
---|---|
author | Themelis, Kristy Ratcliffe, Natasha Nishigami, Tomohiko Wand, Benedict M. Newport, Roger Stanton, Tasha R. |
author_facet | Themelis, Kristy Ratcliffe, Natasha Nishigami, Tomohiko Wand, Benedict M. Newport, Roger Stanton, Tasha R. |
author_sort | Themelis, Kristy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Body re-sizing illusions can profoundly alter perception of our own body. We investigated whether creating the illusion of a muscled and fit-looking back (Strong) influenced perceived back size, body ownership, and attitudes towards self-capacity during a lifting task. Twenty-four healthy male volunteers performed a standardised lifting task while viewing real-time (delay < 20 ms) video of their own back through a head-mounted display under four different conditions (Normal size, Strong, Reshaped, Large; order randomised). The MIRAGE-mediated reality system was used to modify the shape, size, and morphology of the back. Participants were poor at recognizing the correct appearance of their back, for both implicit (perceived width of shoulders and hips) and explicit (questionnaire) measures of back size. Visual distortions of body shape (Reshaped condition) altered implicit back size measures. However, viewing a muscled back (Strong condition) did not result in a sense of agency or ownership and did not update implicit perception of the back. No conditions improved perceptions/attitudes of self-capacity (perceived back strength, perceived lifting confidence, and perceived back fitness). The results lend support for the importance of the embodiment of bodily changes to induce changes in perception. Further work is warranted to determine whether increased exposure to illusory changes would alter perceptions and attitudes towards self-capacity or whether different mechanisms are involved. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00426-021-01609-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9363286 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93632862022-08-11 The effect of visually manipulating back size and morphology on back perception, body ownership, and attitudes towards self-capacity during a lifting task Themelis, Kristy Ratcliffe, Natasha Nishigami, Tomohiko Wand, Benedict M. Newport, Roger Stanton, Tasha R. Psychol Res Original Article Body re-sizing illusions can profoundly alter perception of our own body. We investigated whether creating the illusion of a muscled and fit-looking back (Strong) influenced perceived back size, body ownership, and attitudes towards self-capacity during a lifting task. Twenty-four healthy male volunteers performed a standardised lifting task while viewing real-time (delay < 20 ms) video of their own back through a head-mounted display under four different conditions (Normal size, Strong, Reshaped, Large; order randomised). The MIRAGE-mediated reality system was used to modify the shape, size, and morphology of the back. Participants were poor at recognizing the correct appearance of their back, for both implicit (perceived width of shoulders and hips) and explicit (questionnaire) measures of back size. Visual distortions of body shape (Reshaped condition) altered implicit back size measures. However, viewing a muscled back (Strong condition) did not result in a sense of agency or ownership and did not update implicit perception of the back. No conditions improved perceptions/attitudes of self-capacity (perceived back strength, perceived lifting confidence, and perceived back fitness). The results lend support for the importance of the embodiment of bodily changes to induce changes in perception. Further work is warranted to determine whether increased exposure to illusory changes would alter perceptions and attitudes towards self-capacity or whether different mechanisms are involved. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00426-021-01609-z. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-11-02 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9363286/ /pubmed/34727227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01609-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Themelis, Kristy Ratcliffe, Natasha Nishigami, Tomohiko Wand, Benedict M. Newport, Roger Stanton, Tasha R. The effect of visually manipulating back size and morphology on back perception, body ownership, and attitudes towards self-capacity during a lifting task |
title | The effect of visually manipulating back size and morphology on back perception, body ownership, and attitudes towards self-capacity during a lifting task |
title_full | The effect of visually manipulating back size and morphology on back perception, body ownership, and attitudes towards self-capacity during a lifting task |
title_fullStr | The effect of visually manipulating back size and morphology on back perception, body ownership, and attitudes towards self-capacity during a lifting task |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of visually manipulating back size and morphology on back perception, body ownership, and attitudes towards self-capacity during a lifting task |
title_short | The effect of visually manipulating back size and morphology on back perception, body ownership, and attitudes towards self-capacity during a lifting task |
title_sort | effect of visually manipulating back size and morphology on back perception, body ownership, and attitudes towards self-capacity during a lifting task |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9363286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34727227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01609-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT themeliskristy theeffectofvisuallymanipulatingbacksizeandmorphologyonbackperceptionbodyownershipandattitudestowardsselfcapacityduringaliftingtask AT ratcliffenatasha theeffectofvisuallymanipulatingbacksizeandmorphologyonbackperceptionbodyownershipandattitudestowardsselfcapacityduringaliftingtask AT nishigamitomohiko theeffectofvisuallymanipulatingbacksizeandmorphologyonbackperceptionbodyownershipandattitudestowardsselfcapacityduringaliftingtask AT wandbenedictm theeffectofvisuallymanipulatingbacksizeandmorphologyonbackperceptionbodyownershipandattitudestowardsselfcapacityduringaliftingtask AT newportroger theeffectofvisuallymanipulatingbacksizeandmorphologyonbackperceptionbodyownershipandattitudestowardsselfcapacityduringaliftingtask AT stantontashar theeffectofvisuallymanipulatingbacksizeandmorphologyonbackperceptionbodyownershipandattitudestowardsselfcapacityduringaliftingtask AT themeliskristy effectofvisuallymanipulatingbacksizeandmorphologyonbackperceptionbodyownershipandattitudestowardsselfcapacityduringaliftingtask AT ratcliffenatasha effectofvisuallymanipulatingbacksizeandmorphologyonbackperceptionbodyownershipandattitudestowardsselfcapacityduringaliftingtask AT nishigamitomohiko effectofvisuallymanipulatingbacksizeandmorphologyonbackperceptionbodyownershipandattitudestowardsselfcapacityduringaliftingtask AT wandbenedictm effectofvisuallymanipulatingbacksizeandmorphologyonbackperceptionbodyownershipandattitudestowardsselfcapacityduringaliftingtask AT newportroger effectofvisuallymanipulatingbacksizeandmorphologyonbackperceptionbodyownershipandattitudestowardsselfcapacityduringaliftingtask AT stantontashar effectofvisuallymanipulatingbacksizeandmorphologyonbackperceptionbodyownershipandattitudestowardsselfcapacityduringaliftingtask |