Cargando…

Voice quality after transoral CO(2) laser microsurgery (TOLMS): systematic review of literature

PURPOSE: Transoral laser microsurgery (TOLMS) with carbon dioxide is a safe approach for laryngeal carcinoma. In literature there are three main methods for evaluating speech outcomes: acoustic and aerodynamics analysis, perceptual evaluation and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The aim of this stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Colizza, Andrea, Ralli, Massimo, D’Elia, Chiara, Greco, Antonio, de Vincentiis, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9363323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35505113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07418-3
_version_ 1784764905234104320
author Colizza, Andrea
Ralli, Massimo
D’Elia, Chiara
Greco, Antonio
de Vincentiis, Marco
author_facet Colizza, Andrea
Ralli, Massimo
D’Elia, Chiara
Greco, Antonio
de Vincentiis, Marco
author_sort Colizza, Andrea
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Transoral laser microsurgery (TOLMS) with carbon dioxide is a safe approach for laryngeal carcinoma. In literature there are three main methods for evaluating speech outcomes: acoustic and aerodynamics analysis, perceptual evaluation and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature about the voice quality outcomes of TOLMS according to type of cordectomy. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed and all the results until December 2021 were extrapolated. We evaluated the acoustic and aerodynamics parameters (fundamental frequency, harmonics to noise ratio, jitter, shimmer and maximum phonation time), perceptual data (GRBAS scale) and patient-related outcomes (VHI scale). RESULTS: 24 studies met the inclusion criteria for a total number of 1207 patients enrolled. The number for each type of cordectomy are: 287 type I (23.78%), 311 type II (25.78%), 328 type III (27.14%), 129 type 4 (10.69%) and 152 type V (12.60%). Patients are grouped according to the type of cordectomy in: limited cordectomy (type I and II) and extended cordectomy (types III–IV–V). The difference between two groups is statistically significative in terms of acoustic analysis, perceptual data and patient-related outcomes (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent type I or II cordectomy have significantly better quality of voice in terms of VHI, perceptual voice quality evaluations and acoustic parameters compared to type III, IV and V cordectomies. The effect of TOLMS on the voice should depend from the extent of the resection and in particular from the scar of the vocal muscle.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9363323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93633232022-08-11 Voice quality after transoral CO(2) laser microsurgery (TOLMS): systematic review of literature Colizza, Andrea Ralli, Massimo D’Elia, Chiara Greco, Antonio de Vincentiis, Marco Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Review Article PURPOSE: Transoral laser microsurgery (TOLMS) with carbon dioxide is a safe approach for laryngeal carcinoma. In literature there are three main methods for evaluating speech outcomes: acoustic and aerodynamics analysis, perceptual evaluation and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature about the voice quality outcomes of TOLMS according to type of cordectomy. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed and all the results until December 2021 were extrapolated. We evaluated the acoustic and aerodynamics parameters (fundamental frequency, harmonics to noise ratio, jitter, shimmer and maximum phonation time), perceptual data (GRBAS scale) and patient-related outcomes (VHI scale). RESULTS: 24 studies met the inclusion criteria for a total number of 1207 patients enrolled. The number for each type of cordectomy are: 287 type I (23.78%), 311 type II (25.78%), 328 type III (27.14%), 129 type 4 (10.69%) and 152 type V (12.60%). Patients are grouped according to the type of cordectomy in: limited cordectomy (type I and II) and extended cordectomy (types III–IV–V). The difference between two groups is statistically significative in terms of acoustic analysis, perceptual data and patient-related outcomes (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent type I or II cordectomy have significantly better quality of voice in terms of VHI, perceptual voice quality evaluations and acoustic parameters compared to type III, IV and V cordectomies. The effect of TOLMS on the voice should depend from the extent of the resection and in particular from the scar of the vocal muscle. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-05-03 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9363323/ /pubmed/35505113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07418-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Colizza, Andrea
Ralli, Massimo
D’Elia, Chiara
Greco, Antonio
de Vincentiis, Marco
Voice quality after transoral CO(2) laser microsurgery (TOLMS): systematic review of literature
title Voice quality after transoral CO(2) laser microsurgery (TOLMS): systematic review of literature
title_full Voice quality after transoral CO(2) laser microsurgery (TOLMS): systematic review of literature
title_fullStr Voice quality after transoral CO(2) laser microsurgery (TOLMS): systematic review of literature
title_full_unstemmed Voice quality after transoral CO(2) laser microsurgery (TOLMS): systematic review of literature
title_short Voice quality after transoral CO(2) laser microsurgery (TOLMS): systematic review of literature
title_sort voice quality after transoral co(2) laser microsurgery (tolms): systematic review of literature
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9363323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35505113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07418-3
work_keys_str_mv AT colizzaandrea voicequalityaftertransoralco2lasermicrosurgerytolmssystematicreviewofliterature
AT rallimassimo voicequalityaftertransoralco2lasermicrosurgerytolmssystematicreviewofliterature
AT deliachiara voicequalityaftertransoralco2lasermicrosurgerytolmssystematicreviewofliterature
AT grecoantonio voicequalityaftertransoralco2lasermicrosurgerytolmssystematicreviewofliterature
AT devincentiismarco voicequalityaftertransoralco2lasermicrosurgerytolmssystematicreviewofliterature