Cargando…

Return-sweep saccades in oral reading

Recent research on return-sweep saccades has improved our understanding of eye movements when reading paragraphs. However, these saccades, which take our gaze from the end of one line to the start of the next line, have been studied only within the context of silent reading. Articulatory demands and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adedeji, Victoria I., Vasilev, Martin R., Kirkby, Julie A., Slattery, Timothy J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9363329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34694488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01610-6
_version_ 1784764906438918144
author Adedeji, Victoria I.
Vasilev, Martin R.
Kirkby, Julie A.
Slattery, Timothy J.
author_facet Adedeji, Victoria I.
Vasilev, Martin R.
Kirkby, Julie A.
Slattery, Timothy J.
author_sort Adedeji, Victoria I.
collection PubMed
description Recent research on return-sweep saccades has improved our understanding of eye movements when reading paragraphs. However, these saccades, which take our gaze from the end of one line to the start of the next line, have been studied only within the context of silent reading. Articulatory demands and the coordination of the eye–voice span (EVS) at line boundaries suggest that the execution of this saccade may be different in oral reading. We compared launch and landing positions of return-sweeps, corrective saccade probability and fixations adjacent to return-sweeps in skilled adult readers while reading paragraphs aloud and silently. Compared to silent reading, return-sweeps were launched from closer to the end of the line and landed closer to the start of the next line when reading aloud. The probability of making a corrective saccade was higher for oral reading than silent reading. These indicate that oral reading may compel readers to rely more on foveal processing at the expense of parafoveal processing. We found an interaction between reading modality and fixation type on fixation durations. The reading modality effect (i.e., increased fixation durations in oral compared to silent reading) was greater for accurate line-initial fixations and marginally greater for line-final fixations compared to intra-line fixations. This suggests that readers may use the fixations adjacent to return-sweeps as natural pause locations to modulate the EVS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9363329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93633292022-08-11 Return-sweep saccades in oral reading Adedeji, Victoria I. Vasilev, Martin R. Kirkby, Julie A. Slattery, Timothy J. Psychol Res Original Article Recent research on return-sweep saccades has improved our understanding of eye movements when reading paragraphs. However, these saccades, which take our gaze from the end of one line to the start of the next line, have been studied only within the context of silent reading. Articulatory demands and the coordination of the eye–voice span (EVS) at line boundaries suggest that the execution of this saccade may be different in oral reading. We compared launch and landing positions of return-sweeps, corrective saccade probability and fixations adjacent to return-sweeps in skilled adult readers while reading paragraphs aloud and silently. Compared to silent reading, return-sweeps were launched from closer to the end of the line and landed closer to the start of the next line when reading aloud. The probability of making a corrective saccade was higher for oral reading than silent reading. These indicate that oral reading may compel readers to rely more on foveal processing at the expense of parafoveal processing. We found an interaction between reading modality and fixation type on fixation durations. The reading modality effect (i.e., increased fixation durations in oral compared to silent reading) was greater for accurate line-initial fixations and marginally greater for line-final fixations compared to intra-line fixations. This suggests that readers may use the fixations adjacent to return-sweeps as natural pause locations to modulate the EVS. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-10-25 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9363329/ /pubmed/34694488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01610-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Adedeji, Victoria I.
Vasilev, Martin R.
Kirkby, Julie A.
Slattery, Timothy J.
Return-sweep saccades in oral reading
title Return-sweep saccades in oral reading
title_full Return-sweep saccades in oral reading
title_fullStr Return-sweep saccades in oral reading
title_full_unstemmed Return-sweep saccades in oral reading
title_short Return-sweep saccades in oral reading
title_sort return-sweep saccades in oral reading
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9363329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34694488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01610-6
work_keys_str_mv AT adedejivictoriai returnsweepsaccadesinoralreading
AT vasilevmartinr returnsweepsaccadesinoralreading
AT kirkbyjuliea returnsweepsaccadesinoralreading
AT slatterytimothyj returnsweepsaccadesinoralreading