Cargando…
Does the Structure Matter? An External Validation and Health Economic Results Comparison of Event Simulation Approaches in Severe Obesity
OBJECTIVES: As obesity-associated events impact long-term survival, health economic (HE) modelling is commonly applied, but modelling approaches are diverse. This research aimed to compare the events simulation and the HE outcomes produced by different obesity modelling approaches. METHODS: An exter...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9363367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35771486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-022-01162-6 |
_version_ | 1784764913958256640 |
---|---|
author | Schwander, Björn Kaier, Klaus Hiligsmann, Mickaël Evers, Silvia Nuijten, Mark |
author_facet | Schwander, Björn Kaier, Klaus Hiligsmann, Mickaël Evers, Silvia Nuijten, Mark |
author_sort | Schwander, Björn |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: As obesity-associated events impact long-term survival, health economic (HE) modelling is commonly applied, but modelling approaches are diverse. This research aimed to compare the events simulation and the HE outcomes produced by different obesity modelling approaches. METHODS: An external validation, using the Swedish obesity subjects (SOS) study, of three main structural event modelling approaches was performed: (1) continuous body mass index (BMI) approach; (2) risk equation approach; and (3) categorical BMI-related approach. Outcomes evaluated were mortality, cardiovascular events, and type 2 diabetes (T2D) for both the surgery and the control arms. Concordance between modelling results and the SOS study were investigated by different state-of-the-art measurements, and categorized by the grade of deviation observed (grades 1–4 expressing mild, moderate, severe, and very severe deviations). Furthermore, the costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained of surgery versus controls were compared. RESULTS: Overall and by study arm, the risk equation approach presented the lowest average grade of deviation (overall grade 2.50; control arm 2.25; surgery arm 2.75), followed by the continuous BMI approach (overall 3.25; control 3.50; surgery 3.00) and by the categorial BMI approach (overall 3.63; control 3.50; surgery 3.75). Considering different confidence interval limits, the costs per QALY gained were fairly comparable between all structural approaches (ranging from £2,055 to £6,206 simulating a lifetime horizon). CONCLUSION: None of the structural approaches provided perfect external event validation, although the risk equation approach showed the lowest overall deviations. The economic outcomes resulting from the three approaches were fairly comparable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40273-022-01162-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9363367 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93633672022-08-11 Does the Structure Matter? An External Validation and Health Economic Results Comparison of Event Simulation Approaches in Severe Obesity Schwander, Björn Kaier, Klaus Hiligsmann, Mickaël Evers, Silvia Nuijten, Mark Pharmacoeconomics Original Research Article OBJECTIVES: As obesity-associated events impact long-term survival, health economic (HE) modelling is commonly applied, but modelling approaches are diverse. This research aimed to compare the events simulation and the HE outcomes produced by different obesity modelling approaches. METHODS: An external validation, using the Swedish obesity subjects (SOS) study, of three main structural event modelling approaches was performed: (1) continuous body mass index (BMI) approach; (2) risk equation approach; and (3) categorical BMI-related approach. Outcomes evaluated were mortality, cardiovascular events, and type 2 diabetes (T2D) for both the surgery and the control arms. Concordance between modelling results and the SOS study were investigated by different state-of-the-art measurements, and categorized by the grade of deviation observed (grades 1–4 expressing mild, moderate, severe, and very severe deviations). Furthermore, the costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained of surgery versus controls were compared. RESULTS: Overall and by study arm, the risk equation approach presented the lowest average grade of deviation (overall grade 2.50; control arm 2.25; surgery arm 2.75), followed by the continuous BMI approach (overall 3.25; control 3.50; surgery 3.00) and by the categorial BMI approach (overall 3.63; control 3.50; surgery 3.75). Considering different confidence interval limits, the costs per QALY gained were fairly comparable between all structural approaches (ranging from £2,055 to £6,206 simulating a lifetime horizon). CONCLUSION: None of the structural approaches provided perfect external event validation, although the risk equation approach showed the lowest overall deviations. The economic outcomes resulting from the three approaches were fairly comparable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40273-022-01162-6. Springer International Publishing 2022-06-30 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9363367/ /pubmed/35771486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-022-01162-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Schwander, Björn Kaier, Klaus Hiligsmann, Mickaël Evers, Silvia Nuijten, Mark Does the Structure Matter? An External Validation and Health Economic Results Comparison of Event Simulation Approaches in Severe Obesity |
title | Does the Structure Matter? An External Validation and Health Economic Results Comparison of Event Simulation Approaches in Severe Obesity |
title_full | Does the Structure Matter? An External Validation and Health Economic Results Comparison of Event Simulation Approaches in Severe Obesity |
title_fullStr | Does the Structure Matter? An External Validation and Health Economic Results Comparison of Event Simulation Approaches in Severe Obesity |
title_full_unstemmed | Does the Structure Matter? An External Validation and Health Economic Results Comparison of Event Simulation Approaches in Severe Obesity |
title_short | Does the Structure Matter? An External Validation and Health Economic Results Comparison of Event Simulation Approaches in Severe Obesity |
title_sort | does the structure matter? an external validation and health economic results comparison of event simulation approaches in severe obesity |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9363367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35771486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-022-01162-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schwanderbjorn doesthestructurematteranexternalvalidationandhealtheconomicresultscomparisonofeventsimulationapproachesinsevereobesity AT kaierklaus doesthestructurematteranexternalvalidationandhealtheconomicresultscomparisonofeventsimulationapproachesinsevereobesity AT hiligsmannmickael doesthestructurematteranexternalvalidationandhealtheconomicresultscomparisonofeventsimulationapproachesinsevereobesity AT everssilvia doesthestructurematteranexternalvalidationandhealtheconomicresultscomparisonofeventsimulationapproachesinsevereobesity AT nuijtenmark doesthestructurematteranexternalvalidationandhealtheconomicresultscomparisonofeventsimulationapproachesinsevereobesity |