Cargando…
Convolutional neural networks for automatic image quality control and EARL compliance of PET images
BACKGROUND: Machine learning studies require a large number of images often obtained on different PET scanners. When merging these images, the use of harmonized images following EARL-standards is essential. However, when including retrospective images, EARL accreditation might not have been in place...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9363539/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35943622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-022-00468-w |
_version_ | 1784764947399442432 |
---|---|
author | Pfaehler, Elisabeth Euba, Daniela Rinscheid, Andreas Hoekstra, Otto S. Zijlstra, Josee van Sluis, Joyce Brouwers, Adrienne H. Lapa, Constantin Boellaard, Ronald |
author_facet | Pfaehler, Elisabeth Euba, Daniela Rinscheid, Andreas Hoekstra, Otto S. Zijlstra, Josee van Sluis, Joyce Brouwers, Adrienne H. Lapa, Constantin Boellaard, Ronald |
author_sort | Pfaehler, Elisabeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Machine learning studies require a large number of images often obtained on different PET scanners. When merging these images, the use of harmonized images following EARL-standards is essential. However, when including retrospective images, EARL accreditation might not have been in place. The aim of this study was to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) that can identify retrospectively if an image is EARL compliant and if it is meeting older or newer EARL-standards. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 96 PET images acquired on three PET/CT systems were included in the study. All images were reconstructed with the locally clinically preferred, EARL1, and EARL2 compliant reconstruction protocols. After image pre-processing, one CNN was trained to separate clinical and EARL compliant reconstructions. A second CNN was optimized to identify EARL1 and EARL2 compliant images. The accuracy of both CNNs was assessed using fivefold cross-validation. The CNNs were validated on 24 images acquired on a PET scanner not included in the training data. To assess the impact of image noise on the CNN decision, the 24 images were reconstructed with different scan durations. RESULTS: In the cross-validation, the first CNN classified all images correctly. When identifying EARL1 and EARL2 compliant images, the second CNN identified 100% EARL1 compliant and 85% EARL2 compliant images correctly. The accuracy in the independent dataset was comparable to the cross-validation accuracy. The scan duration had almost no impact on the results. CONCLUSION: The two CNNs trained in this study can be used to retrospectively include images in a multi-center setting by, e.g., adding additional smoothing. This method is especially important for machine learning studies where the harmonization of images from different PET systems is essential. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40658-022-00468-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9363539 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93635392022-08-11 Convolutional neural networks for automatic image quality control and EARL compliance of PET images Pfaehler, Elisabeth Euba, Daniela Rinscheid, Andreas Hoekstra, Otto S. Zijlstra, Josee van Sluis, Joyce Brouwers, Adrienne H. Lapa, Constantin Boellaard, Ronald EJNMMI Phys Original Research BACKGROUND: Machine learning studies require a large number of images often obtained on different PET scanners. When merging these images, the use of harmonized images following EARL-standards is essential. However, when including retrospective images, EARL accreditation might not have been in place. The aim of this study was to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) that can identify retrospectively if an image is EARL compliant and if it is meeting older or newer EARL-standards. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 96 PET images acquired on three PET/CT systems were included in the study. All images were reconstructed with the locally clinically preferred, EARL1, and EARL2 compliant reconstruction protocols. After image pre-processing, one CNN was trained to separate clinical and EARL compliant reconstructions. A second CNN was optimized to identify EARL1 and EARL2 compliant images. The accuracy of both CNNs was assessed using fivefold cross-validation. The CNNs were validated on 24 images acquired on a PET scanner not included in the training data. To assess the impact of image noise on the CNN decision, the 24 images were reconstructed with different scan durations. RESULTS: In the cross-validation, the first CNN classified all images correctly. When identifying EARL1 and EARL2 compliant images, the second CNN identified 100% EARL1 compliant and 85% EARL2 compliant images correctly. The accuracy in the independent dataset was comparable to the cross-validation accuracy. The scan duration had almost no impact on the results. CONCLUSION: The two CNNs trained in this study can be used to retrospectively include images in a multi-center setting by, e.g., adding additional smoothing. This method is especially important for machine learning studies where the harmonization of images from different PET systems is essential. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40658-022-00468-w. Springer International Publishing 2022-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9363539/ /pubmed/35943622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-022-00468-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Pfaehler, Elisabeth Euba, Daniela Rinscheid, Andreas Hoekstra, Otto S. Zijlstra, Josee van Sluis, Joyce Brouwers, Adrienne H. Lapa, Constantin Boellaard, Ronald Convolutional neural networks for automatic image quality control and EARL compliance of PET images |
title | Convolutional neural networks for automatic image quality control and EARL compliance of PET images |
title_full | Convolutional neural networks for automatic image quality control and EARL compliance of PET images |
title_fullStr | Convolutional neural networks for automatic image quality control and EARL compliance of PET images |
title_full_unstemmed | Convolutional neural networks for automatic image quality control and EARL compliance of PET images |
title_short | Convolutional neural networks for automatic image quality control and EARL compliance of PET images |
title_sort | convolutional neural networks for automatic image quality control and earl compliance of pet images |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9363539/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35943622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-022-00468-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pfaehlerelisabeth convolutionalneuralnetworksforautomaticimagequalitycontrolandearlcomplianceofpetimages AT eubadaniela convolutionalneuralnetworksforautomaticimagequalitycontrolandearlcomplianceofpetimages AT rinscheidandreas convolutionalneuralnetworksforautomaticimagequalitycontrolandearlcomplianceofpetimages AT hoekstraottos convolutionalneuralnetworksforautomaticimagequalitycontrolandearlcomplianceofpetimages AT zijlstrajosee convolutionalneuralnetworksforautomaticimagequalitycontrolandearlcomplianceofpetimages AT vansluisjoyce convolutionalneuralnetworksforautomaticimagequalitycontrolandearlcomplianceofpetimages AT brouwersadrienneh convolutionalneuralnetworksforautomaticimagequalitycontrolandearlcomplianceofpetimages AT lapaconstantin convolutionalneuralnetworksforautomaticimagequalitycontrolandearlcomplianceofpetimages AT boellaardronald convolutionalneuralnetworksforautomaticimagequalitycontrolandearlcomplianceofpetimages |