Cargando…

Mitigation of perioperative neurocognitive disorders: A holistic approach

William Morton introduced the world to ether anesthesia for use during surgery in the Bullfinch Building of the Massachusetts General Hospital on October 16, 1846. For nearly two centuries, the prevailing wisdom had been that the effects of general anesthetics were rapidly and fully reversible, with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Safavynia, Seyed A., Goldstein, Peter A., Evered, Lisbeth A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9363758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966792
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.949148
_version_ 1784765000071512064
author Safavynia, Seyed A.
Goldstein, Peter A.
Evered, Lisbeth A.
author_facet Safavynia, Seyed A.
Goldstein, Peter A.
Evered, Lisbeth A.
author_sort Safavynia, Seyed A.
collection PubMed
description William Morton introduced the world to ether anesthesia for use during surgery in the Bullfinch Building of the Massachusetts General Hospital on October 16, 1846. For nearly two centuries, the prevailing wisdom had been that the effects of general anesthetics were rapidly and fully reversible, with no apparent long-term adverse sequelae. Despite occasional concerns of a possible association between surgery and anesthesia with dementia since 1887 (Savage, 1887), our initial belief was robustly punctured following the publication in 1998 of the International Study of Post-Operative Cognitive Dysfunction [ISPOCD 1] study by Moller et al. (1998) in The Lancet, in which they demonstrated in a prospective fashion that there were in fact persistent adverse effects on neurocognitive function up to 3 months following surgery and that these effects were common. Since the publication of that landmark study, significant strides have been made in redefining the terminology describing cognitive dysfunction, identifying those patients most at risk, and establishing the underlying etiology of the condition, particularly with respect to the relative contributions of anesthesia and surgery. In 2018, the International Nomenclature Consensus Working Group proposed new nomenclature to standardize identification of and classify perioperative cognitive changes under the umbrella of perioperative neurocognitive disorders (PND) (Evered et al., 2018a). Since then, the new nomenclature has tried to describe post-surgical cognitive derangements within a unifying framework and has brought to light the need to standardize methodology in clinical studies and motivate such studies with hypotheses of PND pathogenesis. In this narrative review, we highlight the relevant literature regarding recent key developments in PND identification and management throughout the perioperative period. We provide an overview of the new nomenclature and its implications for interpreting risk factors identified by clinical association studies. We then describe current hypotheses for PND development, using data from clinical association studies and neurophysiologic data where appropriate. Finally, we offer broad clinical guidelines for mitigating PND in the perioperative period, highlighting the role of Brain Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (Brain-ERAS) protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9363758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93637582022-08-11 Mitigation of perioperative neurocognitive disorders: A holistic approach Safavynia, Seyed A. Goldstein, Peter A. Evered, Lisbeth A. Front Aging Neurosci Aging Neuroscience William Morton introduced the world to ether anesthesia for use during surgery in the Bullfinch Building of the Massachusetts General Hospital on October 16, 1846. For nearly two centuries, the prevailing wisdom had been that the effects of general anesthetics were rapidly and fully reversible, with no apparent long-term adverse sequelae. Despite occasional concerns of a possible association between surgery and anesthesia with dementia since 1887 (Savage, 1887), our initial belief was robustly punctured following the publication in 1998 of the International Study of Post-Operative Cognitive Dysfunction [ISPOCD 1] study by Moller et al. (1998) in The Lancet, in which they demonstrated in a prospective fashion that there were in fact persistent adverse effects on neurocognitive function up to 3 months following surgery and that these effects were common. Since the publication of that landmark study, significant strides have been made in redefining the terminology describing cognitive dysfunction, identifying those patients most at risk, and establishing the underlying etiology of the condition, particularly with respect to the relative contributions of anesthesia and surgery. In 2018, the International Nomenclature Consensus Working Group proposed new nomenclature to standardize identification of and classify perioperative cognitive changes under the umbrella of perioperative neurocognitive disorders (PND) (Evered et al., 2018a). Since then, the new nomenclature has tried to describe post-surgical cognitive derangements within a unifying framework and has brought to light the need to standardize methodology in clinical studies and motivate such studies with hypotheses of PND pathogenesis. In this narrative review, we highlight the relevant literature regarding recent key developments in PND identification and management throughout the perioperative period. We provide an overview of the new nomenclature and its implications for interpreting risk factors identified by clinical association studies. We then describe current hypotheses for PND development, using data from clinical association studies and neurophysiologic data where appropriate. Finally, we offer broad clinical guidelines for mitigating PND in the perioperative period, highlighting the role of Brain Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (Brain-ERAS) protocols. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9363758/ /pubmed/35966792 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.949148 Text en Copyright © 2022 Safavynia, Goldstein and Evered. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Aging Neuroscience
Safavynia, Seyed A.
Goldstein, Peter A.
Evered, Lisbeth A.
Mitigation of perioperative neurocognitive disorders: A holistic approach
title Mitigation of perioperative neurocognitive disorders: A holistic approach
title_full Mitigation of perioperative neurocognitive disorders: A holistic approach
title_fullStr Mitigation of perioperative neurocognitive disorders: A holistic approach
title_full_unstemmed Mitigation of perioperative neurocognitive disorders: A holistic approach
title_short Mitigation of perioperative neurocognitive disorders: A holistic approach
title_sort mitigation of perioperative neurocognitive disorders: a holistic approach
topic Aging Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9363758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966792
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.949148
work_keys_str_mv AT safavyniaseyeda mitigationofperioperativeneurocognitivedisordersaholisticapproach
AT goldsteinpetera mitigationofperioperativeneurocognitivedisordersaholisticapproach
AT everedlisbetha mitigationofperioperativeneurocognitivedisordersaholisticapproach