Cargando…

The positive impact of a care–physical activity initiative for people with a low socioeconomic status on health, quality of life and societal participation: a mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND: Overweight and obesity rates are increasing worldwide, particularly among people with a low socioeconomic status (SES). Care–physical activity (care–PA) initiatives may improve participants’ lifestyles and thereby lower overweight and obesity rates. A two-year care–PA initiative specific...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mulderij, Lisanne Sofie, Verkooijen, Kirsten T., Groenewoud, Stef, Koelen, Maria A., Wagemakers, Annemarie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9363851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35948969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13936-w
_version_ 1784765024093339648
author Mulderij, Lisanne Sofie
Verkooijen, Kirsten T.
Groenewoud, Stef
Koelen, Maria A.
Wagemakers, Annemarie
author_facet Mulderij, Lisanne Sofie
Verkooijen, Kirsten T.
Groenewoud, Stef
Koelen, Maria A.
Wagemakers, Annemarie
author_sort Mulderij, Lisanne Sofie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Overweight and obesity rates are increasing worldwide, particularly among people with a low socioeconomic status (SES). Care–physical activity (care–PA) initiatives may improve participants’ lifestyles and thereby lower overweight and obesity rates. A two-year care–PA initiative specifically developed for citizens with a low SES, X-Fittt 2.0, was offered free of charge to participants, and included 12 weeks of intensive guidance and sports sessions, and 21 months of aftercare. Here, we study the impact of X-Fittt 2.0 on health, quality of life (QoL) and societal participation using a mixed-methods design. METHODS: Questionnaires and body measurements were taken from 208 participants at the start of X-Fittt 2.0 (t(0)) and after 12 weeks (t(1)), one year (t(2)) and two to three years (t(3)). We also held 17 group discussions (t(1), n = 71) and 68 semi-structured interviews (t(2) and t(3)). Continuous variables were analysed using a linear mixed-model analysis (corrected for gender, age at t(0), height, education level and employment status at the different time points), while we used descriptive statistics for the categorical variables. Qualitative data were analysed using a thematic analysis. RESULTS: Body weight was significantly lower at all three post-initiative time points compared with the baseline, with a maximum of 3.8 kg difference at t(2). Body Mass Index, waist circumference, blood pressure and self-perceived health only significantly improved during the first 12 weeks. A positive trend regarding paid work was observed, while social visits decreased. The latter might be explained by the COVID-19 pandemic, as lockdowns limited social life. Furthermore, participants reported increased PA (including sports) and a few stopped smoking or drinking alcohol. Participants mentioned feeling healthier, fitter and more energetic. Additionally, participants’ self-esteem and stress levels improved, stimulating them to become more socially active. However, the participants also mentioned barriers to being physically active, such as a lack of money or time, or physical or mental health problems. CONCLUSIONS: X-Fittt 2.0 improved the health, QoL and societal participation of the participants. Future initiatives should take into account the aforementioned barriers, and consider a longer intervention period for more sustainable results. More complete data are needed to confirm the findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13936-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9363851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93638512022-08-10 The positive impact of a care–physical activity initiative for people with a low socioeconomic status on health, quality of life and societal participation: a mixed-methods study Mulderij, Lisanne Sofie Verkooijen, Kirsten T. Groenewoud, Stef Koelen, Maria A. Wagemakers, Annemarie BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Overweight and obesity rates are increasing worldwide, particularly among people with a low socioeconomic status (SES). Care–physical activity (care–PA) initiatives may improve participants’ lifestyles and thereby lower overweight and obesity rates. A two-year care–PA initiative specifically developed for citizens with a low SES, X-Fittt 2.0, was offered free of charge to participants, and included 12 weeks of intensive guidance and sports sessions, and 21 months of aftercare. Here, we study the impact of X-Fittt 2.0 on health, quality of life (QoL) and societal participation using a mixed-methods design. METHODS: Questionnaires and body measurements were taken from 208 participants at the start of X-Fittt 2.0 (t(0)) and after 12 weeks (t(1)), one year (t(2)) and two to three years (t(3)). We also held 17 group discussions (t(1), n = 71) and 68 semi-structured interviews (t(2) and t(3)). Continuous variables were analysed using a linear mixed-model analysis (corrected for gender, age at t(0), height, education level and employment status at the different time points), while we used descriptive statistics for the categorical variables. Qualitative data were analysed using a thematic analysis. RESULTS: Body weight was significantly lower at all three post-initiative time points compared with the baseline, with a maximum of 3.8 kg difference at t(2). Body Mass Index, waist circumference, blood pressure and self-perceived health only significantly improved during the first 12 weeks. A positive trend regarding paid work was observed, while social visits decreased. The latter might be explained by the COVID-19 pandemic, as lockdowns limited social life. Furthermore, participants reported increased PA (including sports) and a few stopped smoking or drinking alcohol. Participants mentioned feeling healthier, fitter and more energetic. Additionally, participants’ self-esteem and stress levels improved, stimulating them to become more socially active. However, the participants also mentioned barriers to being physically active, such as a lack of money or time, or physical or mental health problems. CONCLUSIONS: X-Fittt 2.0 improved the health, QoL and societal participation of the participants. Future initiatives should take into account the aforementioned barriers, and consider a longer intervention period for more sustainable results. More complete data are needed to confirm the findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13936-w. BioMed Central 2022-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9363851/ /pubmed/35948969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13936-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Mulderij, Lisanne Sofie
Verkooijen, Kirsten T.
Groenewoud, Stef
Koelen, Maria A.
Wagemakers, Annemarie
The positive impact of a care–physical activity initiative for people with a low socioeconomic status on health, quality of life and societal participation: a mixed-methods study
title The positive impact of a care–physical activity initiative for people with a low socioeconomic status on health, quality of life and societal participation: a mixed-methods study
title_full The positive impact of a care–physical activity initiative for people with a low socioeconomic status on health, quality of life and societal participation: a mixed-methods study
title_fullStr The positive impact of a care–physical activity initiative for people with a low socioeconomic status on health, quality of life and societal participation: a mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed The positive impact of a care–physical activity initiative for people with a low socioeconomic status on health, quality of life and societal participation: a mixed-methods study
title_short The positive impact of a care–physical activity initiative for people with a low socioeconomic status on health, quality of life and societal participation: a mixed-methods study
title_sort positive impact of a care–physical activity initiative for people with a low socioeconomic status on health, quality of life and societal participation: a mixed-methods study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9363851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35948969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13936-w
work_keys_str_mv AT mulderijlisannesofie thepositiveimpactofacarephysicalactivityinitiativeforpeoplewithalowsocioeconomicstatusonhealthqualityoflifeandsocietalparticipationamixedmethodsstudy
AT verkooijenkirstent thepositiveimpactofacarephysicalactivityinitiativeforpeoplewithalowsocioeconomicstatusonhealthqualityoflifeandsocietalparticipationamixedmethodsstudy
AT groenewoudstef thepositiveimpactofacarephysicalactivityinitiativeforpeoplewithalowsocioeconomicstatusonhealthqualityoflifeandsocietalparticipationamixedmethodsstudy
AT koelenmariaa thepositiveimpactofacarephysicalactivityinitiativeforpeoplewithalowsocioeconomicstatusonhealthqualityoflifeandsocietalparticipationamixedmethodsstudy
AT wagemakersannemarie thepositiveimpactofacarephysicalactivityinitiativeforpeoplewithalowsocioeconomicstatusonhealthqualityoflifeandsocietalparticipationamixedmethodsstudy
AT mulderijlisannesofie positiveimpactofacarephysicalactivityinitiativeforpeoplewithalowsocioeconomicstatusonhealthqualityoflifeandsocietalparticipationamixedmethodsstudy
AT verkooijenkirstent positiveimpactofacarephysicalactivityinitiativeforpeoplewithalowsocioeconomicstatusonhealthqualityoflifeandsocietalparticipationamixedmethodsstudy
AT groenewoudstef positiveimpactofacarephysicalactivityinitiativeforpeoplewithalowsocioeconomicstatusonhealthqualityoflifeandsocietalparticipationamixedmethodsstudy
AT koelenmariaa positiveimpactofacarephysicalactivityinitiativeforpeoplewithalowsocioeconomicstatusonhealthqualityoflifeandsocietalparticipationamixedmethodsstudy
AT wagemakersannemarie positiveimpactofacarephysicalactivityinitiativeforpeoplewithalowsocioeconomicstatusonhealthqualityoflifeandsocietalparticipationamixedmethodsstudy