Cargando…

A study on quality control using delta data with machine learning technique

BACKGROUND: In the big data era, patient-based real-time quality control (PBRTQC), as an emerging quality control (QC) method, is expanding within the clinical laboratory industry. However, the main issue of current PBRTQC methodology is data stability. Our study is aimed to explore a novel protocol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liang, Yufang, Wang, Zhe, Huang, Dawei, Wang, Wei, Feng, Xiang, Han, Zewen, Song, Biao, Wang, Qingtao, Zhou, Rui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9363967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35965972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09935
_version_ 1784765051062714368
author Liang, Yufang
Wang, Zhe
Huang, Dawei
Wang, Wei
Feng, Xiang
Han, Zewen
Song, Biao
Wang, Qingtao
Zhou, Rui
author_facet Liang, Yufang
Wang, Zhe
Huang, Dawei
Wang, Wei
Feng, Xiang
Han, Zewen
Song, Biao
Wang, Qingtao
Zhou, Rui
author_sort Liang, Yufang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the big data era, patient-based real-time quality control (PBRTQC), as an emerging quality control (QC) method, is expanding within the clinical laboratory industry. However, the main issue of current PBRTQC methodology is data stability. Our study is aimed to explore a novel protocol for data stability by combining delta data with machine learning (ML) technique to improve the capacity of QC event detection. METHODS: A data set of 423,290 laboratory results from Beijing Chao-yang Hospital 2019 patient results were used as a training set (n = 380960, 90%) and internal validation set (n = 42330, 10%). A further 22,460 results from Beijing Long-fu Hospital 2019 patient results were used as a test set. Three-type data (1) Single-type data processed by truncation limits; (2) delta-type data processed by truncation limits and (3)delta-type data processed by Isolated Forest (IF) algorithm were evaluated with accuracy, sensitivity, NPed, etc., and compared with previously published statistical methods. RESULTS: The optimal model was based on Random Forest (RF) algorithm by using delta-type data processed by IF algorithm. The model had a better accuracy (0.99), sensitivity (0.99) specificity (0.99) and AUC (0.99) with the dependent test set, surpassing the critical bias of PBRTQC by over 50%. For the LYMPH#, HGB, and PLT, the cumulative MNPed of MLQC were reduced by 95.43%, 97.39%, and 97.97% respectively when compared to the best of the PBRTQC. CONCLUSION: Final results indicate that by integrating an innovative ML algorithm with the overall data processing protocol the detection of QC events is improved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9363967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93639672022-08-11 A study on quality control using delta data with machine learning technique Liang, Yufang Wang, Zhe Huang, Dawei Wang, Wei Feng, Xiang Han, Zewen Song, Biao Wang, Qingtao Zhou, Rui Heliyon Research Article BACKGROUND: In the big data era, patient-based real-time quality control (PBRTQC), as an emerging quality control (QC) method, is expanding within the clinical laboratory industry. However, the main issue of current PBRTQC methodology is data stability. Our study is aimed to explore a novel protocol for data stability by combining delta data with machine learning (ML) technique to improve the capacity of QC event detection. METHODS: A data set of 423,290 laboratory results from Beijing Chao-yang Hospital 2019 patient results were used as a training set (n = 380960, 90%) and internal validation set (n = 42330, 10%). A further 22,460 results from Beijing Long-fu Hospital 2019 patient results were used as a test set. Three-type data (1) Single-type data processed by truncation limits; (2) delta-type data processed by truncation limits and (3)delta-type data processed by Isolated Forest (IF) algorithm were evaluated with accuracy, sensitivity, NPed, etc., and compared with previously published statistical methods. RESULTS: The optimal model was based on Random Forest (RF) algorithm by using delta-type data processed by IF algorithm. The model had a better accuracy (0.99), sensitivity (0.99) specificity (0.99) and AUC (0.99) with the dependent test set, surpassing the critical bias of PBRTQC by over 50%. For the LYMPH#, HGB, and PLT, the cumulative MNPed of MLQC were reduced by 95.43%, 97.39%, and 97.97% respectively when compared to the best of the PBRTQC. CONCLUSION: Final results indicate that by integrating an innovative ML algorithm with the overall data processing protocol the detection of QC events is improved. Elsevier 2022-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9363967/ /pubmed/35965972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09935 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Liang, Yufang
Wang, Zhe
Huang, Dawei
Wang, Wei
Feng, Xiang
Han, Zewen
Song, Biao
Wang, Qingtao
Zhou, Rui
A study on quality control using delta data with machine learning technique
title A study on quality control using delta data with machine learning technique
title_full A study on quality control using delta data with machine learning technique
title_fullStr A study on quality control using delta data with machine learning technique
title_full_unstemmed A study on quality control using delta data with machine learning technique
title_short A study on quality control using delta data with machine learning technique
title_sort study on quality control using delta data with machine learning technique
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9363967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35965972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09935
work_keys_str_mv AT liangyufang astudyonqualitycontrolusingdeltadatawithmachinelearningtechnique
AT wangzhe astudyonqualitycontrolusingdeltadatawithmachinelearningtechnique
AT huangdawei astudyonqualitycontrolusingdeltadatawithmachinelearningtechnique
AT wangwei astudyonqualitycontrolusingdeltadatawithmachinelearningtechnique
AT fengxiang astudyonqualitycontrolusingdeltadatawithmachinelearningtechnique
AT hanzewen astudyonqualitycontrolusingdeltadatawithmachinelearningtechnique
AT songbiao astudyonqualitycontrolusingdeltadatawithmachinelearningtechnique
AT wangqingtao astudyonqualitycontrolusingdeltadatawithmachinelearningtechnique
AT zhourui astudyonqualitycontrolusingdeltadatawithmachinelearningtechnique
AT liangyufang studyonqualitycontrolusingdeltadatawithmachinelearningtechnique
AT wangzhe studyonqualitycontrolusingdeltadatawithmachinelearningtechnique
AT huangdawei studyonqualitycontrolusingdeltadatawithmachinelearningtechnique
AT wangwei studyonqualitycontrolusingdeltadatawithmachinelearningtechnique
AT fengxiang studyonqualitycontrolusingdeltadatawithmachinelearningtechnique
AT hanzewen studyonqualitycontrolusingdeltadatawithmachinelearningtechnique
AT songbiao studyonqualitycontrolusingdeltadatawithmachinelearningtechnique
AT wangqingtao studyonqualitycontrolusingdeltadatawithmachinelearningtechnique
AT zhourui studyonqualitycontrolusingdeltadatawithmachinelearningtechnique