Cargando…

Psychological inoculation can reduce susceptibility to misinformation in large rational agent networks

The unchecked spread of misinformation is recognized as an increasing threat to public, scientific and democratic health. Online networks are a contributing cause of this spread, with echo chambers and polarization indicative of the interplay between the search behaviours of users and reinforcement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pilditch, Toby D., Roozenbeek, Jon, Madsen, Jens Koed, van der Linden, Sander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9363981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35958086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211953
_version_ 1784765053819420672
author Pilditch, Toby D.
Roozenbeek, Jon
Madsen, Jens Koed
van der Linden, Sander
author_facet Pilditch, Toby D.
Roozenbeek, Jon
Madsen, Jens Koed
van der Linden, Sander
author_sort Pilditch, Toby D.
collection PubMed
description The unchecked spread of misinformation is recognized as an increasing threat to public, scientific and democratic health. Online networks are a contributing cause of this spread, with echo chambers and polarization indicative of the interplay between the search behaviours of users and reinforcement processes within the system they inhabit. Recent empirical work has focused on interventions aimed at inoculating people against misinformation, yielding success on the individual level. However, given the evolving, dynamic information context of online networks, important questions remain regarding how such inoculation interventions interact with network systems. Here we use an agent-based model of a social network populated with belief-updating users. We find that although equally rational agents may be assisted by inoculation interventions to reject misinformation, even among such agents, intervention efficacy is temporally sensitive. We find that as beliefs disseminate, users form self-reinforcing echo chambers, leading to belief consolidation—irrespective of their veracity. Interrupting this process requires ‘front-loading’ of inoculation interventions by targeting critical thresholds of network users before consolidation occurs. We further demonstrate the value of harnessing tipping point dynamics for herd immunity effects, and note that inoculation processes do not necessarily lead to increased rates of ‘false-positive’ rejections of truthful communications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9363981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93639812022-08-10 Psychological inoculation can reduce susceptibility to misinformation in large rational agent networks Pilditch, Toby D. Roozenbeek, Jon Madsen, Jens Koed van der Linden, Sander R Soc Open Sci Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience The unchecked spread of misinformation is recognized as an increasing threat to public, scientific and democratic health. Online networks are a contributing cause of this spread, with echo chambers and polarization indicative of the interplay between the search behaviours of users and reinforcement processes within the system they inhabit. Recent empirical work has focused on interventions aimed at inoculating people against misinformation, yielding success on the individual level. However, given the evolving, dynamic information context of online networks, important questions remain regarding how such inoculation interventions interact with network systems. Here we use an agent-based model of a social network populated with belief-updating users. We find that although equally rational agents may be assisted by inoculation interventions to reject misinformation, even among such agents, intervention efficacy is temporally sensitive. We find that as beliefs disseminate, users form self-reinforcing echo chambers, leading to belief consolidation—irrespective of their veracity. Interrupting this process requires ‘front-loading’ of inoculation interventions by targeting critical thresholds of network users before consolidation occurs. We further demonstrate the value of harnessing tipping point dynamics for herd immunity effects, and note that inoculation processes do not necessarily lead to increased rates of ‘false-positive’ rejections of truthful communications. The Royal Society 2022-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9363981/ /pubmed/35958086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211953 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience
Pilditch, Toby D.
Roozenbeek, Jon
Madsen, Jens Koed
van der Linden, Sander
Psychological inoculation can reduce susceptibility to misinformation in large rational agent networks
title Psychological inoculation can reduce susceptibility to misinformation in large rational agent networks
title_full Psychological inoculation can reduce susceptibility to misinformation in large rational agent networks
title_fullStr Psychological inoculation can reduce susceptibility to misinformation in large rational agent networks
title_full_unstemmed Psychological inoculation can reduce susceptibility to misinformation in large rational agent networks
title_short Psychological inoculation can reduce susceptibility to misinformation in large rational agent networks
title_sort psychological inoculation can reduce susceptibility to misinformation in large rational agent networks
topic Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9363981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35958086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211953
work_keys_str_mv AT pilditchtobyd psychologicalinoculationcanreducesusceptibilitytomisinformationinlargerationalagentnetworks
AT roozenbeekjon psychologicalinoculationcanreducesusceptibilitytomisinformationinlargerationalagentnetworks
AT madsenjenskoed psychologicalinoculationcanreducesusceptibilitytomisinformationinlargerationalagentnetworks
AT vanderlindensander psychologicalinoculationcanreducesusceptibilitytomisinformationinlargerationalagentnetworks