Cargando…
Efficacy of attention bias modification via smartphones in a large population sample
Negative affective biases are a key feature of anxiety and depression that uphold and promote negative mood. Bias modification aims to reduce these biases using computerized training, but shows mixed success and has not been tested at scale. The aim was to determine whether bias modification deliver...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35958083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211629 |
_version_ | 1784765058267480064 |
---|---|
author | Chelliah, Alysha Robinson, Oliver |
author_facet | Chelliah, Alysha Robinson, Oliver |
author_sort | Chelliah, Alysha |
collection | PubMed |
description | Negative affective biases are a key feature of anxiety and depression that uphold and promote negative mood. Bias modification aims to reduce these biases using computerized training, but shows mixed success and has not been tested at scale. The aim was to determine whether bias modification delivered via smartphones can improve mood in a large sample. In total, 153 385 self-referring participants were randomly assigned to modification or sham bias training on a dot-probe or visual-search task. The primary outcome of interest was balance of mood, assessed on the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. In total, 22 933 participants who provided at least two mood ratings were included in analyses. There was a large amount of participant attrition. In the remaining smaller sample, results supported the prediction that visual-search modification would result in improved mood (95%CI [0.10, 0.82]; p = 0.01, d = 0.05, N = 2588 after two ratings; 95%CI [1.75,6.54]; p = 0.001, d = 0.32, N = 118 after six ratings), which was not seen for the sham version (N = 4818 after two ratings; N = 138 after six ratings). Dot-probe modification was not associated with mood improvements (p = 0.52). Visual-search, but not dot-probe, bias modification slightly but significantly improved mood. Although this effect size is very small and subject to large participant drop-off, it might be worth considering an adjunct to current treatments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9364001 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93640012022-08-10 Efficacy of attention bias modification via smartphones in a large population sample Chelliah, Alysha Robinson, Oliver R Soc Open Sci Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Negative affective biases are a key feature of anxiety and depression that uphold and promote negative mood. Bias modification aims to reduce these biases using computerized training, but shows mixed success and has not been tested at scale. The aim was to determine whether bias modification delivered via smartphones can improve mood in a large sample. In total, 153 385 self-referring participants were randomly assigned to modification or sham bias training on a dot-probe or visual-search task. The primary outcome of interest was balance of mood, assessed on the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. In total, 22 933 participants who provided at least two mood ratings were included in analyses. There was a large amount of participant attrition. In the remaining smaller sample, results supported the prediction that visual-search modification would result in improved mood (95%CI [0.10, 0.82]; p = 0.01, d = 0.05, N = 2588 after two ratings; 95%CI [1.75,6.54]; p = 0.001, d = 0.32, N = 118 after six ratings), which was not seen for the sham version (N = 4818 after two ratings; N = 138 after six ratings). Dot-probe modification was not associated with mood improvements (p = 0.52). Visual-search, but not dot-probe, bias modification slightly but significantly improved mood. Although this effect size is very small and subject to large participant drop-off, it might be worth considering an adjunct to current treatments. The Royal Society 2022-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9364001/ /pubmed/35958083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211629 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Chelliah, Alysha Robinson, Oliver Efficacy of attention bias modification via smartphones in a large population sample |
title | Efficacy of attention bias modification via smartphones in a large population sample |
title_full | Efficacy of attention bias modification via smartphones in a large population sample |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of attention bias modification via smartphones in a large population sample |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of attention bias modification via smartphones in a large population sample |
title_short | Efficacy of attention bias modification via smartphones in a large population sample |
title_sort | efficacy of attention bias modification via smartphones in a large population sample |
topic | Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35958083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211629 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chelliahalysha efficacyofattentionbiasmodificationviasmartphonesinalargepopulationsample AT robinsonoliver efficacyofattentionbiasmodificationviasmartphonesinalargepopulationsample |