Cargando…
Optimal health and economic impact of non-pharmaceutical intervention measures prior and post vaccination in England: a mathematical modelling study
Background. Even with good progress on vaccination, SARS-CoV-2 infections in the UK may continue to impose a high burden of disease and therefore pose substantial challenges for health policy decision makers. Stringent government-mandated physical distancing measures (lockdown) have been demonstrate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364008/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35958089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211746 |
_version_ | 1784765060021747712 |
---|---|
author | Tildesley, Michael J. Vassall, Anna Riley, Steven Jit, Mark Sandmann, Frank Hill, Edward M. Thompson, Robin N. Atkins, Benjamin D. Edmunds, John Dyson, Louise Keeling, Matt J. |
author_facet | Tildesley, Michael J. Vassall, Anna Riley, Steven Jit, Mark Sandmann, Frank Hill, Edward M. Thompson, Robin N. Atkins, Benjamin D. Edmunds, John Dyson, Louise Keeling, Matt J. |
author_sort | Tildesley, Michael J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. Even with good progress on vaccination, SARS-CoV-2 infections in the UK may continue to impose a high burden of disease and therefore pose substantial challenges for health policy decision makers. Stringent government-mandated physical distancing measures (lockdown) have been demonstrated to be epidemiologically effective, but can have both positive and negative economic consequences. The duration and frequency of any intervention policy could, in theory, be optimized to maximize economic benefits while achieving substantial reductions in disease. Methods. Here, we use a pre-existing SARS-CoV-2 transmission model to assess the health and economic implications of different strengths of control through time in order to identify optimal approaches to non-pharmaceutical intervention stringency in the UK, considering the role of vaccination in reducing the need for future physical distancing measures. The model is calibrated to the COVID-19 epidemic in England and we carry out retrospective analysis of the optimal timing of precautionary breaks in 2020 and the optimal relaxation policy from the January 2021 lockdown, considering the willingness to pay (WTP) for health improvement. Results. We find that the precise timing and intensity of interventions is highly dependent upon the objective of control. As intervention measures are relaxed, we predict a resurgence in cases, but the optimal intervention policy can be established dependent upon the WTP per quality adjusted life year loss avoided. Our results show that establishing an optimal level of control can result in a reduction in net monetary loss of billions of pounds, dependent upon the precise WTP value. Conclusion. It is vital, as the UK emerges from lockdown, but continues to face an on-going pandemic, to accurately establish the overall health and economic costs when making policy decisions. We demonstrate how some of these can be quantified, employing mechanistic infectious disease transmission models to establish optimal levels of control for the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9364008 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93640082022-08-10 Optimal health and economic impact of non-pharmaceutical intervention measures prior and post vaccination in England: a mathematical modelling study Tildesley, Michael J. Vassall, Anna Riley, Steven Jit, Mark Sandmann, Frank Hill, Edward M. Thompson, Robin N. Atkins, Benjamin D. Edmunds, John Dyson, Louise Keeling, Matt J. R Soc Open Sci Science, Society and Policy Background. Even with good progress on vaccination, SARS-CoV-2 infections in the UK may continue to impose a high burden of disease and therefore pose substantial challenges for health policy decision makers. Stringent government-mandated physical distancing measures (lockdown) have been demonstrated to be epidemiologically effective, but can have both positive and negative economic consequences. The duration and frequency of any intervention policy could, in theory, be optimized to maximize economic benefits while achieving substantial reductions in disease. Methods. Here, we use a pre-existing SARS-CoV-2 transmission model to assess the health and economic implications of different strengths of control through time in order to identify optimal approaches to non-pharmaceutical intervention stringency in the UK, considering the role of vaccination in reducing the need for future physical distancing measures. The model is calibrated to the COVID-19 epidemic in England and we carry out retrospective analysis of the optimal timing of precautionary breaks in 2020 and the optimal relaxation policy from the January 2021 lockdown, considering the willingness to pay (WTP) for health improvement. Results. We find that the precise timing and intensity of interventions is highly dependent upon the objective of control. As intervention measures are relaxed, we predict a resurgence in cases, but the optimal intervention policy can be established dependent upon the WTP per quality adjusted life year loss avoided. Our results show that establishing an optimal level of control can result in a reduction in net monetary loss of billions of pounds, dependent upon the precise WTP value. Conclusion. It is vital, as the UK emerges from lockdown, but continues to face an on-going pandemic, to accurately establish the overall health and economic costs when making policy decisions. We demonstrate how some of these can be quantified, employing mechanistic infectious disease transmission models to establish optimal levels of control for the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The Royal Society 2022-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9364008/ /pubmed/35958089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211746 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Science, Society and Policy Tildesley, Michael J. Vassall, Anna Riley, Steven Jit, Mark Sandmann, Frank Hill, Edward M. Thompson, Robin N. Atkins, Benjamin D. Edmunds, John Dyson, Louise Keeling, Matt J. Optimal health and economic impact of non-pharmaceutical intervention measures prior and post vaccination in England: a mathematical modelling study |
title | Optimal health and economic impact of non-pharmaceutical intervention measures prior and post vaccination in England: a mathematical modelling study |
title_full | Optimal health and economic impact of non-pharmaceutical intervention measures prior and post vaccination in England: a mathematical modelling study |
title_fullStr | Optimal health and economic impact of non-pharmaceutical intervention measures prior and post vaccination in England: a mathematical modelling study |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal health and economic impact of non-pharmaceutical intervention measures prior and post vaccination in England: a mathematical modelling study |
title_short | Optimal health and economic impact of non-pharmaceutical intervention measures prior and post vaccination in England: a mathematical modelling study |
title_sort | optimal health and economic impact of non-pharmaceutical intervention measures prior and post vaccination in england: a mathematical modelling study |
topic | Science, Society and Policy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364008/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35958089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211746 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tildesleymichaelj optimalhealthandeconomicimpactofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionmeasurespriorandpostvaccinationinenglandamathematicalmodellingstudy AT vassallanna optimalhealthandeconomicimpactofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionmeasurespriorandpostvaccinationinenglandamathematicalmodellingstudy AT rileysteven optimalhealthandeconomicimpactofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionmeasurespriorandpostvaccinationinenglandamathematicalmodellingstudy AT jitmark optimalhealthandeconomicimpactofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionmeasurespriorandpostvaccinationinenglandamathematicalmodellingstudy AT sandmannfrank optimalhealthandeconomicimpactofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionmeasurespriorandpostvaccinationinenglandamathematicalmodellingstudy AT hilledwardm optimalhealthandeconomicimpactofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionmeasurespriorandpostvaccinationinenglandamathematicalmodellingstudy AT thompsonrobinn optimalhealthandeconomicimpactofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionmeasurespriorandpostvaccinationinenglandamathematicalmodellingstudy AT atkinsbenjamind optimalhealthandeconomicimpactofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionmeasurespriorandpostvaccinationinenglandamathematicalmodellingstudy AT edmundsjohn optimalhealthandeconomicimpactofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionmeasurespriorandpostvaccinationinenglandamathematicalmodellingstudy AT dysonlouise optimalhealthandeconomicimpactofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionmeasurespriorandpostvaccinationinenglandamathematicalmodellingstudy AT keelingmattj optimalhealthandeconomicimpactofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionmeasurespriorandpostvaccinationinenglandamathematicalmodellingstudy |