Cargando…

Optimal health and economic impact of non-pharmaceutical intervention measures prior and post vaccination in England: a mathematical modelling study

Background. Even with good progress on vaccination, SARS-CoV-2 infections in the UK may continue to impose a high burden of disease and therefore pose substantial challenges for health policy decision makers. Stringent government-mandated physical distancing measures (lockdown) have been demonstrate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tildesley, Michael J., Vassall, Anna, Riley, Steven, Jit, Mark, Sandmann, Frank, Hill, Edward M., Thompson, Robin N., Atkins, Benjamin D., Edmunds, John, Dyson, Louise, Keeling, Matt J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35958089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211746
_version_ 1784765060021747712
author Tildesley, Michael J.
Vassall, Anna
Riley, Steven
Jit, Mark
Sandmann, Frank
Hill, Edward M.
Thompson, Robin N.
Atkins, Benjamin D.
Edmunds, John
Dyson, Louise
Keeling, Matt J.
author_facet Tildesley, Michael J.
Vassall, Anna
Riley, Steven
Jit, Mark
Sandmann, Frank
Hill, Edward M.
Thompson, Robin N.
Atkins, Benjamin D.
Edmunds, John
Dyson, Louise
Keeling, Matt J.
author_sort Tildesley, Michael J.
collection PubMed
description Background. Even with good progress on vaccination, SARS-CoV-2 infections in the UK may continue to impose a high burden of disease and therefore pose substantial challenges for health policy decision makers. Stringent government-mandated physical distancing measures (lockdown) have been demonstrated to be epidemiologically effective, but can have both positive and negative economic consequences. The duration and frequency of any intervention policy could, in theory, be optimized to maximize economic benefits while achieving substantial reductions in disease. Methods. Here, we use a pre-existing SARS-CoV-2 transmission model to assess the health and economic implications of different strengths of control through time in order to identify optimal approaches to non-pharmaceutical intervention stringency in the UK, considering the role of vaccination in reducing the need for future physical distancing measures. The model is calibrated to the COVID-19 epidemic in England and we carry out retrospective analysis of the optimal timing of precautionary breaks in 2020 and the optimal relaxation policy from the January 2021 lockdown, considering the willingness to pay (WTP) for health improvement. Results. We find that the precise timing and intensity of interventions is highly dependent upon the objective of control. As intervention measures are relaxed, we predict a resurgence in cases, but the optimal intervention policy can be established dependent upon the WTP per quality adjusted life year loss avoided. Our results show that establishing an optimal level of control can result in a reduction in net monetary loss of billions of pounds, dependent upon the precise WTP value. Conclusion. It is vital, as the UK emerges from lockdown, but continues to face an on-going pandemic, to accurately establish the overall health and economic costs when making policy decisions. We demonstrate how some of these can be quantified, employing mechanistic infectious disease transmission models to establish optimal levels of control for the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9364008
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93640082022-08-10 Optimal health and economic impact of non-pharmaceutical intervention measures prior and post vaccination in England: a mathematical modelling study Tildesley, Michael J. Vassall, Anna Riley, Steven Jit, Mark Sandmann, Frank Hill, Edward M. Thompson, Robin N. Atkins, Benjamin D. Edmunds, John Dyson, Louise Keeling, Matt J. R Soc Open Sci Science, Society and Policy Background. Even with good progress on vaccination, SARS-CoV-2 infections in the UK may continue to impose a high burden of disease and therefore pose substantial challenges for health policy decision makers. Stringent government-mandated physical distancing measures (lockdown) have been demonstrated to be epidemiologically effective, but can have both positive and negative economic consequences. The duration and frequency of any intervention policy could, in theory, be optimized to maximize economic benefits while achieving substantial reductions in disease. Methods. Here, we use a pre-existing SARS-CoV-2 transmission model to assess the health and economic implications of different strengths of control through time in order to identify optimal approaches to non-pharmaceutical intervention stringency in the UK, considering the role of vaccination in reducing the need for future physical distancing measures. The model is calibrated to the COVID-19 epidemic in England and we carry out retrospective analysis of the optimal timing of precautionary breaks in 2020 and the optimal relaxation policy from the January 2021 lockdown, considering the willingness to pay (WTP) for health improvement. Results. We find that the precise timing and intensity of interventions is highly dependent upon the objective of control. As intervention measures are relaxed, we predict a resurgence in cases, but the optimal intervention policy can be established dependent upon the WTP per quality adjusted life year loss avoided. Our results show that establishing an optimal level of control can result in a reduction in net monetary loss of billions of pounds, dependent upon the precise WTP value. Conclusion. It is vital, as the UK emerges from lockdown, but continues to face an on-going pandemic, to accurately establish the overall health and economic costs when making policy decisions. We demonstrate how some of these can be quantified, employing mechanistic infectious disease transmission models to establish optimal levels of control for the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The Royal Society 2022-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9364008/ /pubmed/35958089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211746 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Science, Society and Policy
Tildesley, Michael J.
Vassall, Anna
Riley, Steven
Jit, Mark
Sandmann, Frank
Hill, Edward M.
Thompson, Robin N.
Atkins, Benjamin D.
Edmunds, John
Dyson, Louise
Keeling, Matt J.
Optimal health and economic impact of non-pharmaceutical intervention measures prior and post vaccination in England: a mathematical modelling study
title Optimal health and economic impact of non-pharmaceutical intervention measures prior and post vaccination in England: a mathematical modelling study
title_full Optimal health and economic impact of non-pharmaceutical intervention measures prior and post vaccination in England: a mathematical modelling study
title_fullStr Optimal health and economic impact of non-pharmaceutical intervention measures prior and post vaccination in England: a mathematical modelling study
title_full_unstemmed Optimal health and economic impact of non-pharmaceutical intervention measures prior and post vaccination in England: a mathematical modelling study
title_short Optimal health and economic impact of non-pharmaceutical intervention measures prior and post vaccination in England: a mathematical modelling study
title_sort optimal health and economic impact of non-pharmaceutical intervention measures prior and post vaccination in england: a mathematical modelling study
topic Science, Society and Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35958089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211746
work_keys_str_mv AT tildesleymichaelj optimalhealthandeconomicimpactofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionmeasurespriorandpostvaccinationinenglandamathematicalmodellingstudy
AT vassallanna optimalhealthandeconomicimpactofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionmeasurespriorandpostvaccinationinenglandamathematicalmodellingstudy
AT rileysteven optimalhealthandeconomicimpactofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionmeasurespriorandpostvaccinationinenglandamathematicalmodellingstudy
AT jitmark optimalhealthandeconomicimpactofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionmeasurespriorandpostvaccinationinenglandamathematicalmodellingstudy
AT sandmannfrank optimalhealthandeconomicimpactofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionmeasurespriorandpostvaccinationinenglandamathematicalmodellingstudy
AT hilledwardm optimalhealthandeconomicimpactofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionmeasurespriorandpostvaccinationinenglandamathematicalmodellingstudy
AT thompsonrobinn optimalhealthandeconomicimpactofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionmeasurespriorandpostvaccinationinenglandamathematicalmodellingstudy
AT atkinsbenjamind optimalhealthandeconomicimpactofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionmeasurespriorandpostvaccinationinenglandamathematicalmodellingstudy
AT edmundsjohn optimalhealthandeconomicimpactofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionmeasurespriorandpostvaccinationinenglandamathematicalmodellingstudy
AT dysonlouise optimalhealthandeconomicimpactofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionmeasurespriorandpostvaccinationinenglandamathematicalmodellingstudy
AT keelingmattj optimalhealthandeconomicimpactofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionmeasurespriorandpostvaccinationinenglandamathematicalmodellingstudy