Cargando…
Computed Tomography Colonography (CTC): Is It Really the Non-Invasive Option We Think It Is? A Patient Experience Study
Aims: Computed tomography colonography (CTC) is seen as a more tolerable alternative to colonoscopy, but patients struggle with the steps required for optimal diagnostic imaging. This prospective study aims to understand the experience of patients undergoing CTC. Methods: A survey was completed by a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364188/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35968057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23743735221117926 |
_version_ | 1784765095561134080 |
---|---|
author | Dewar, Greg Brockbank, Bethany Randall, Jonathan |
author_facet | Dewar, Greg Brockbank, Bethany Randall, Jonathan |
author_sort | Dewar, Greg |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aims: Computed tomography colonography (CTC) is seen as a more tolerable alternative to colonoscopy, but patients struggle with the steps required for optimal diagnostic imaging. This prospective study aims to understand the experience of patients undergoing CTC. Methods: A survey was completed by a convenience sample of patients before and after CTC over 7 months. The 13-item questionnaire covered pre-test information, overall and specific experience of the test. The responses were tabulated and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative free-text responses were coded for content and thematic analysis. Results: At a response rate of 51%, surveys were received from 41 patients. Overall, most patients (54%) found the investigation better than expected. However, 18% stated they were not informed of potential side effects. Side effects were experienced by 49% of patients, including diarrhea (34%) and abdominal pain (24%). About 59% experienced discomfort with gas insufflation, and 86% found turning during the investigation difficult. Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients undergoing CTC experience side effects and difficulties completing the investigation. Patient information is important to improve patient experience of CTC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9364188 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93641882022-08-11 Computed Tomography Colonography (CTC): Is It Really the Non-Invasive Option We Think It Is? A Patient Experience Study Dewar, Greg Brockbank, Bethany Randall, Jonathan J Patient Exp Research Article Aims: Computed tomography colonography (CTC) is seen as a more tolerable alternative to colonoscopy, but patients struggle with the steps required for optimal diagnostic imaging. This prospective study aims to understand the experience of patients undergoing CTC. Methods: A survey was completed by a convenience sample of patients before and after CTC over 7 months. The 13-item questionnaire covered pre-test information, overall and specific experience of the test. The responses were tabulated and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative free-text responses were coded for content and thematic analysis. Results: At a response rate of 51%, surveys were received from 41 patients. Overall, most patients (54%) found the investigation better than expected. However, 18% stated they were not informed of potential side effects. Side effects were experienced by 49% of patients, including diarrhea (34%) and abdominal pain (24%). About 59% experienced discomfort with gas insufflation, and 86% found turning during the investigation difficult. Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients undergoing CTC experience side effects and difficulties completing the investigation. Patient information is important to improve patient experience of CTC. SAGE Publications 2022-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9364188/ /pubmed/35968057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23743735221117926 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dewar, Greg Brockbank, Bethany Randall, Jonathan Computed Tomography Colonography (CTC): Is It Really the Non-Invasive Option We Think It Is? A Patient Experience Study |
title | Computed Tomography Colonography (CTC): Is It Really the Non-Invasive
Option We Think It Is? A Patient Experience Study |
title_full | Computed Tomography Colonography (CTC): Is It Really the Non-Invasive
Option We Think It Is? A Patient Experience Study |
title_fullStr | Computed Tomography Colonography (CTC): Is It Really the Non-Invasive
Option We Think It Is? A Patient Experience Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Computed Tomography Colonography (CTC): Is It Really the Non-Invasive
Option We Think It Is? A Patient Experience Study |
title_short | Computed Tomography Colonography (CTC): Is It Really the Non-Invasive
Option We Think It Is? A Patient Experience Study |
title_sort | computed tomography colonography (ctc): is it really the non-invasive
option we think it is? a patient experience study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364188/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35968057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23743735221117926 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dewargreg computedtomographycolonographyctcisitreallythenoninvasiveoptionwethinkitisapatientexperiencestudy AT brockbankbethany computedtomographycolonographyctcisitreallythenoninvasiveoptionwethinkitisapatientexperiencestudy AT randalljonathan computedtomographycolonographyctcisitreallythenoninvasiveoptionwethinkitisapatientexperiencestudy |