Cargando…

Computed Tomography Colonography (CTC): Is It Really the Non-Invasive Option We Think It Is? A Patient Experience Study

Aims: Computed tomography colonography (CTC) is seen as a more tolerable alternative to colonoscopy, but patients struggle with the steps required for optimal diagnostic imaging. This prospective study aims to understand the experience of patients undergoing CTC. Methods: A survey was completed by a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dewar, Greg, Brockbank, Bethany, Randall, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35968057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23743735221117926
_version_ 1784765095561134080
author Dewar, Greg
Brockbank, Bethany
Randall, Jonathan
author_facet Dewar, Greg
Brockbank, Bethany
Randall, Jonathan
author_sort Dewar, Greg
collection PubMed
description Aims: Computed tomography colonography (CTC) is seen as a more tolerable alternative to colonoscopy, but patients struggle with the steps required for optimal diagnostic imaging. This prospective study aims to understand the experience of patients undergoing CTC. Methods: A survey was completed by a convenience sample of patients before and after CTC over 7 months. The 13-item questionnaire covered pre-test information, overall and specific experience of the test. The responses were tabulated and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative free-text responses were coded for content and thematic analysis. Results: At a response rate of 51%, surveys were received from 41 patients. Overall, most patients (54%) found the investigation better than expected. However, 18% stated they were not informed of potential side effects. Side effects were experienced by 49% of patients, including diarrhea (34%) and abdominal pain (24%). About 59% experienced discomfort with gas insufflation, and 86% found turning during the investigation difficult. Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients undergoing CTC experience side effects and difficulties completing the investigation. Patient information is important to improve patient experience of CTC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9364188
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93641882022-08-11 Computed Tomography Colonography (CTC): Is It Really the Non-Invasive Option We Think It Is? A Patient Experience Study Dewar, Greg Brockbank, Bethany Randall, Jonathan J Patient Exp Research Article Aims: Computed tomography colonography (CTC) is seen as a more tolerable alternative to colonoscopy, but patients struggle with the steps required for optimal diagnostic imaging. This prospective study aims to understand the experience of patients undergoing CTC. Methods: A survey was completed by a convenience sample of patients before and after CTC over 7 months. The 13-item questionnaire covered pre-test information, overall and specific experience of the test. The responses were tabulated and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative free-text responses were coded for content and thematic analysis. Results: At a response rate of 51%, surveys were received from 41 patients. Overall, most patients (54%) found the investigation better than expected. However, 18% stated they were not informed of potential side effects. Side effects were experienced by 49% of patients, including diarrhea (34%) and abdominal pain (24%). About 59% experienced discomfort with gas insufflation, and 86% found turning during the investigation difficult. Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients undergoing CTC experience side effects and difficulties completing the investigation. Patient information is important to improve patient experience of CTC. SAGE Publications 2022-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9364188/ /pubmed/35968057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23743735221117926 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research Article
Dewar, Greg
Brockbank, Bethany
Randall, Jonathan
Computed Tomography Colonography (CTC): Is It Really the Non-Invasive Option We Think It Is? A Patient Experience Study
title Computed Tomography Colonography (CTC): Is It Really the Non-Invasive Option We Think It Is? A Patient Experience Study
title_full Computed Tomography Colonography (CTC): Is It Really the Non-Invasive Option We Think It Is? A Patient Experience Study
title_fullStr Computed Tomography Colonography (CTC): Is It Really the Non-Invasive Option We Think It Is? A Patient Experience Study
title_full_unstemmed Computed Tomography Colonography (CTC): Is It Really the Non-Invasive Option We Think It Is? A Patient Experience Study
title_short Computed Tomography Colonography (CTC): Is It Really the Non-Invasive Option We Think It Is? A Patient Experience Study
title_sort computed tomography colonography (ctc): is it really the non-invasive option we think it is? a patient experience study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35968057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23743735221117926
work_keys_str_mv AT dewargreg computedtomographycolonographyctcisitreallythenoninvasiveoptionwethinkitisapatientexperiencestudy
AT brockbankbethany computedtomographycolonographyctcisitreallythenoninvasiveoptionwethinkitisapatientexperiencestudy
AT randalljonathan computedtomographycolonographyctcisitreallythenoninvasiveoptionwethinkitisapatientexperiencestudy