Cargando…

Intramedullary Nail or Primary Arthroplasty? A System Review and Meta-Analysis on the Prognosis of Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures Based on Randomized Controlled Trials

INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus regarding the superiority between intramedullary nailing and primary arthroplasty in the management of intertrochanteric femoral fractures. This systematic review was performed to investigate and compare the clinical efficacy of intertrochanteric femoral fractures...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Zhaojun, Gu, Fei, Xu, Shizhuang, Yue, Yang, Sun, Kefu, Nie, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35967750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21514593221118212
_version_ 1784765099957813248
author Wang, Zhaojun
Gu, Fei
Xu, Shizhuang
Yue, Yang
Sun, Kefu
Nie, Wei
author_facet Wang, Zhaojun
Gu, Fei
Xu, Shizhuang
Yue, Yang
Sun, Kefu
Nie, Wei
author_sort Wang, Zhaojun
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus regarding the superiority between intramedullary nailing and primary arthroplasty in the management of intertrochanteric femoral fractures. This systematic review was performed to investigate and compare the clinical efficacy of intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with these 2 methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of science core collection and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials which compared the clinical outcomes of intertrochanteric fractures treated with either intramedullary nails or primary arthroplasty. Relevant data of the postoperative complications, reoperations, mortality and functional assessment, were pooled and presented graphically. RESULTS: A total of 6 trials with 427 participants were identified and included in the analyses. The pooled estimates suggested these 2 techniques have comparable risks in terms of overall complications (pooled risk ratio [RR] .80; 95% confidence interval [CI] .43 to 1.43; I(2) = 79.94%), the rate of patients with orthopedic complications (RR .71, 95% CI .40 to 1.27; I(2) = .00%), reoperations (RR 1.33, 95% CI .48 to 3.71; I(2) = .00%), the overall mortality (RR .52; 95%CI .26 to 1.02; I(2) = 31.35%) and 1-year mortality (RR .67; 95%CI .38 to 1.19; I(2) = .00%). Primary arthroplasty associated with higher HHS at 3 months postoperatively (MD -21.95, 95% CI -28.29 to −15.60; I(2) = 70.44%). While the difference was not significant at 6 months (MD 2.32, 95% CI -1.55 to 6.18; I(2) = .00%), and even reversed at 12 months postoperatively (MD 13.02, 95% CI 8.14 to 17.90; I(2) = 73.42%). CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analytic pooling of current evidences demonstrated that primary arthroplasty is related to a better early functional recovery at the early stage postoperatively, but the long-term result tends to favor to intramedullary nailing. The differences in overall complications, the rate of patients with orthopedic complications, reoperations, overall and 1-year mortality did not reach a significant level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9364206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93642062022-08-11 Intramedullary Nail or Primary Arthroplasty? A System Review and Meta-Analysis on the Prognosis of Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures Based on Randomized Controlled Trials Wang, Zhaojun Gu, Fei Xu, Shizhuang Yue, Yang Sun, Kefu Nie, Wei Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil Systematic Review INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus regarding the superiority between intramedullary nailing and primary arthroplasty in the management of intertrochanteric femoral fractures. This systematic review was performed to investigate and compare the clinical efficacy of intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with these 2 methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of science core collection and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials which compared the clinical outcomes of intertrochanteric fractures treated with either intramedullary nails or primary arthroplasty. Relevant data of the postoperative complications, reoperations, mortality and functional assessment, were pooled and presented graphically. RESULTS: A total of 6 trials with 427 participants were identified and included in the analyses. The pooled estimates suggested these 2 techniques have comparable risks in terms of overall complications (pooled risk ratio [RR] .80; 95% confidence interval [CI] .43 to 1.43; I(2) = 79.94%), the rate of patients with orthopedic complications (RR .71, 95% CI .40 to 1.27; I(2) = .00%), reoperations (RR 1.33, 95% CI .48 to 3.71; I(2) = .00%), the overall mortality (RR .52; 95%CI .26 to 1.02; I(2) = 31.35%) and 1-year mortality (RR .67; 95%CI .38 to 1.19; I(2) = .00%). Primary arthroplasty associated with higher HHS at 3 months postoperatively (MD -21.95, 95% CI -28.29 to −15.60; I(2) = 70.44%). While the difference was not significant at 6 months (MD 2.32, 95% CI -1.55 to 6.18; I(2) = .00%), and even reversed at 12 months postoperatively (MD 13.02, 95% CI 8.14 to 17.90; I(2) = 73.42%). CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analytic pooling of current evidences demonstrated that primary arthroplasty is related to a better early functional recovery at the early stage postoperatively, but the long-term result tends to favor to intramedullary nailing. The differences in overall complications, the rate of patients with orthopedic complications, reoperations, overall and 1-year mortality did not reach a significant level. SAGE Publications 2022-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9364206/ /pubmed/35967750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21514593221118212 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Wang, Zhaojun
Gu, Fei
Xu, Shizhuang
Yue, Yang
Sun, Kefu
Nie, Wei
Intramedullary Nail or Primary Arthroplasty? A System Review and Meta-Analysis on the Prognosis of Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures Based on Randomized Controlled Trials
title Intramedullary Nail or Primary Arthroplasty? A System Review and Meta-Analysis on the Prognosis of Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures Based on Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Intramedullary Nail or Primary Arthroplasty? A System Review and Meta-Analysis on the Prognosis of Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures Based on Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Intramedullary Nail or Primary Arthroplasty? A System Review and Meta-Analysis on the Prognosis of Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures Based on Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Intramedullary Nail or Primary Arthroplasty? A System Review and Meta-Analysis on the Prognosis of Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures Based on Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Intramedullary Nail or Primary Arthroplasty? A System Review and Meta-Analysis on the Prognosis of Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures Based on Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort intramedullary nail or primary arthroplasty? a system review and meta-analysis on the prognosis of intertrochanteric femoral fractures based on randomized controlled trials
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35967750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21514593221118212
work_keys_str_mv AT wangzhaojun intramedullarynailorprimaryarthroplastyasystemreviewandmetaanalysisontheprognosisofintertrochantericfemoralfracturesbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT gufei intramedullarynailorprimaryarthroplastyasystemreviewandmetaanalysisontheprognosisofintertrochantericfemoralfracturesbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xushizhuang intramedullarynailorprimaryarthroplastyasystemreviewandmetaanalysisontheprognosisofintertrochantericfemoralfracturesbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yueyang intramedullarynailorprimaryarthroplastyasystemreviewandmetaanalysisontheprognosisofintertrochantericfemoralfracturesbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT sunkefu intramedullarynailorprimaryarthroplastyasystemreviewandmetaanalysisontheprognosisofintertrochantericfemoralfracturesbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT niewei intramedullarynailorprimaryarthroplastyasystemreviewandmetaanalysisontheprognosisofintertrochantericfemoralfracturesbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials