Cargando…

Comparison of anal dilatation versus no dilatation with a standardized dilator in reducing pain after hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized control trial

BACKGROUND: Post-operative pain is the main problem of hemorrhoidectomy. An adequate pain management can promote early mobilization, fast recovery, and reduce hospitalization costs. This study aimed to investigate the role of preoperative anal dilatation using a standardized anal dilator in reducing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sofii, Imam, Darmawan, Handy, Ramadhini, Amelia Sophia, Kurniawan, Fauzan, Hanif, Ahmad Shafa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35945514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02409-4
_version_ 1784765165888077824
author Sofii, Imam
Darmawan, Handy
Ramadhini, Amelia Sophia
Kurniawan, Fauzan
Hanif, Ahmad Shafa
author_facet Sofii, Imam
Darmawan, Handy
Ramadhini, Amelia Sophia
Kurniawan, Fauzan
Hanif, Ahmad Shafa
author_sort Sofii, Imam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Post-operative pain is the main problem of hemorrhoidectomy. An adequate pain management can promote early mobilization, fast recovery, and reduce hospitalization costs. This study aimed to investigate the role of preoperative anal dilatation using a standardized anal dilator in reducing post-operative pain. METHOD: This study was conducted using randomized prospective trial with a total of 40 subjects, who were divided into 2 groups. The first group received preoperative anal dilatation using a 33 mm anal dilator for 20 min, while the second group did not. The post-operative anal pain, edema, bleeding, and incontinence were observed in the first, second, and seventh day. RESULT: The post-operative pain was significantly lower in the preoperative anal dilatation group for all days of observation (p < 0.05). The difference of post-operative bleeding and edema between groups were not significant. Fecal incontinence was initially significantly higher in the preoperative anal dilatation group, but the difference was insignificant at the seventh day (p = 0.500). CONCLUSION: Preoperative anal dilatation significantly reduced post-operative pain. The side effect of fecal incontinence was only temporary until the seventh day after surgery. Trial Registration This trial was registered on Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR) with TCTR identification number TCTR20220314002, on 14/03/2022 (retrospectively registered).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9364542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93645422022-08-11 Comparison of anal dilatation versus no dilatation with a standardized dilator in reducing pain after hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized control trial Sofii, Imam Darmawan, Handy Ramadhini, Amelia Sophia Kurniawan, Fauzan Hanif, Ahmad Shafa BMC Gastroenterol Research BACKGROUND: Post-operative pain is the main problem of hemorrhoidectomy. An adequate pain management can promote early mobilization, fast recovery, and reduce hospitalization costs. This study aimed to investigate the role of preoperative anal dilatation using a standardized anal dilator in reducing post-operative pain. METHOD: This study was conducted using randomized prospective trial with a total of 40 subjects, who were divided into 2 groups. The first group received preoperative anal dilatation using a 33 mm anal dilator for 20 min, while the second group did not. The post-operative anal pain, edema, bleeding, and incontinence were observed in the first, second, and seventh day. RESULT: The post-operative pain was significantly lower in the preoperative anal dilatation group for all days of observation (p < 0.05). The difference of post-operative bleeding and edema between groups were not significant. Fecal incontinence was initially significantly higher in the preoperative anal dilatation group, but the difference was insignificant at the seventh day (p = 0.500). CONCLUSION: Preoperative anal dilatation significantly reduced post-operative pain. The side effect of fecal incontinence was only temporary until the seventh day after surgery. Trial Registration This trial was registered on Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR) with TCTR identification number TCTR20220314002, on 14/03/2022 (retrospectively registered). BioMed Central 2022-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9364542/ /pubmed/35945514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02409-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Sofii, Imam
Darmawan, Handy
Ramadhini, Amelia Sophia
Kurniawan, Fauzan
Hanif, Ahmad Shafa
Comparison of anal dilatation versus no dilatation with a standardized dilator in reducing pain after hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized control trial
title Comparison of anal dilatation versus no dilatation with a standardized dilator in reducing pain after hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized control trial
title_full Comparison of anal dilatation versus no dilatation with a standardized dilator in reducing pain after hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized control trial
title_fullStr Comparison of anal dilatation versus no dilatation with a standardized dilator in reducing pain after hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized control trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of anal dilatation versus no dilatation with a standardized dilator in reducing pain after hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized control trial
title_short Comparison of anal dilatation versus no dilatation with a standardized dilator in reducing pain after hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized control trial
title_sort comparison of anal dilatation versus no dilatation with a standardized dilator in reducing pain after hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized control trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35945514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02409-4
work_keys_str_mv AT sofiiimam comparisonofanaldilatationversusnodilatationwithastandardizeddilatorinreducingpainafterhemorrhoidectomyarandomizedcontroltrial
AT darmawanhandy comparisonofanaldilatationversusnodilatationwithastandardizeddilatorinreducingpainafterhemorrhoidectomyarandomizedcontroltrial
AT ramadhiniameliasophia comparisonofanaldilatationversusnodilatationwithastandardizeddilatorinreducingpainafterhemorrhoidectomyarandomizedcontroltrial
AT kurniawanfauzan comparisonofanaldilatationversusnodilatationwithastandardizeddilatorinreducingpainafterhemorrhoidectomyarandomizedcontroltrial
AT hanifahmadshafa comparisonofanaldilatationversusnodilatationwithastandardizeddilatorinreducingpainafterhemorrhoidectomyarandomizedcontroltrial