Cargando…
Whole genome non-invasive prenatal testing in prenatal screening algorithm: clinical experience from 12,700 pregnancies
BACKGROUND: A fast adoption of a non–invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in clinical practice is a global tendency last years. Firstly, in Russia according a new regulation it was possible to perform a widescale testing of pregnant women in chromosomal abnormality risk. The aim of the study—to assess e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35945516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04966-8 |
_version_ | 1784765181259153408 |
---|---|
author | Baranova, Elena E. Sagaydak, Olesya V. Galaktionova, Alexandra M. Kuznetsova, Ekaterina S. Kaplanova, Madina T. Makarova, Maria V. Belenikin, Maxim S. Olenev, Anton S. Songolova, Ekaterina N. |
author_facet | Baranova, Elena E. Sagaydak, Olesya V. Galaktionova, Alexandra M. Kuznetsova, Ekaterina S. Kaplanova, Madina T. Makarova, Maria V. Belenikin, Maxim S. Olenev, Anton S. Songolova, Ekaterina N. |
author_sort | Baranova, Elena E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A fast adoption of a non–invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in clinical practice is a global tendency last years. Firstly, in Russia according a new regulation it was possible to perform a widescale testing of pregnant women in chromosomal abnormality risk. The aim of the study—to assess efficiency of using NIPT as a second-line first trimester screening test in Moscow. METHODS: Based on the first trimester combined prenatal screening results 12,700 pregnant women were classified as a high-risk (cut-off ≥ 1:100) and an intermediate-risk (cut-off 1:101 – 1:2500) groups followed by whole genome NIPT. Women from high-risk group and those who had positive NIPT results from intermediate-risk group were considered for invasive prenatal diagnostic. RESULTS: 258 (2.0%) samples with positive NIPT results were detected including 126 cases of trisomy 21 (T21), 40 cases of T18, 12 cases of T13, 41 cases of sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) and 39 cases of rare autosomal aneuploidies (RAAs) and significant copy number variations (CNVs). Statistically significant associations (p < 0.05) were revealed for fetal fraction (FF) and both for some patient’s (body mass index and weight) and fetus’s (sex and high risk of aneuploidies) characteristics. NIPT showed as a high sensitivity as specificity for common trisomies and SCAs with an overall false positive rate 0.3%. CONCLUSIONS: NIPT demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity. As a second-line screening test it has shown a high efficiency in detecting fetus chromosomal anomalies as well as it could potentially lower the number of invasive procedures in pregnant women. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9364619 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93646192022-08-11 Whole genome non-invasive prenatal testing in prenatal screening algorithm: clinical experience from 12,700 pregnancies Baranova, Elena E. Sagaydak, Olesya V. Galaktionova, Alexandra M. Kuznetsova, Ekaterina S. Kaplanova, Madina T. Makarova, Maria V. Belenikin, Maxim S. Olenev, Anton S. Songolova, Ekaterina N. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: A fast adoption of a non–invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in clinical practice is a global tendency last years. Firstly, in Russia according a new regulation it was possible to perform a widescale testing of pregnant women in chromosomal abnormality risk. The aim of the study—to assess efficiency of using NIPT as a second-line first trimester screening test in Moscow. METHODS: Based on the first trimester combined prenatal screening results 12,700 pregnant women were classified as a high-risk (cut-off ≥ 1:100) and an intermediate-risk (cut-off 1:101 – 1:2500) groups followed by whole genome NIPT. Women from high-risk group and those who had positive NIPT results from intermediate-risk group were considered for invasive prenatal diagnostic. RESULTS: 258 (2.0%) samples with positive NIPT results were detected including 126 cases of trisomy 21 (T21), 40 cases of T18, 12 cases of T13, 41 cases of sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) and 39 cases of rare autosomal aneuploidies (RAAs) and significant copy number variations (CNVs). Statistically significant associations (p < 0.05) were revealed for fetal fraction (FF) and both for some patient’s (body mass index and weight) and fetus’s (sex and high risk of aneuploidies) characteristics. NIPT showed as a high sensitivity as specificity for common trisomies and SCAs with an overall false positive rate 0.3%. CONCLUSIONS: NIPT demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity. As a second-line screening test it has shown a high efficiency in detecting fetus chromosomal anomalies as well as it could potentially lower the number of invasive procedures in pregnant women. BioMed Central 2022-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9364619/ /pubmed/35945516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04966-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Baranova, Elena E. Sagaydak, Olesya V. Galaktionova, Alexandra M. Kuznetsova, Ekaterina S. Kaplanova, Madina T. Makarova, Maria V. Belenikin, Maxim S. Olenev, Anton S. Songolova, Ekaterina N. Whole genome non-invasive prenatal testing in prenatal screening algorithm: clinical experience from 12,700 pregnancies |
title | Whole genome non-invasive prenatal testing in prenatal screening algorithm: clinical experience from 12,700 pregnancies |
title_full | Whole genome non-invasive prenatal testing in prenatal screening algorithm: clinical experience from 12,700 pregnancies |
title_fullStr | Whole genome non-invasive prenatal testing in prenatal screening algorithm: clinical experience from 12,700 pregnancies |
title_full_unstemmed | Whole genome non-invasive prenatal testing in prenatal screening algorithm: clinical experience from 12,700 pregnancies |
title_short | Whole genome non-invasive prenatal testing in prenatal screening algorithm: clinical experience from 12,700 pregnancies |
title_sort | whole genome non-invasive prenatal testing in prenatal screening algorithm: clinical experience from 12,700 pregnancies |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35945516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04966-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baranovaelenae wholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltestinginprenatalscreeningalgorithmclinicalexperiencefrom12700pregnancies AT sagaydakolesyav wholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltestinginprenatalscreeningalgorithmclinicalexperiencefrom12700pregnancies AT galaktionovaalexandram wholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltestinginprenatalscreeningalgorithmclinicalexperiencefrom12700pregnancies AT kuznetsovaekaterinas wholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltestinginprenatalscreeningalgorithmclinicalexperiencefrom12700pregnancies AT kaplanovamadinat wholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltestinginprenatalscreeningalgorithmclinicalexperiencefrom12700pregnancies AT makarovamariav wholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltestinginprenatalscreeningalgorithmclinicalexperiencefrom12700pregnancies AT belenikinmaxims wholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltestinginprenatalscreeningalgorithmclinicalexperiencefrom12700pregnancies AT olenevantons wholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltestinginprenatalscreeningalgorithmclinicalexperiencefrom12700pregnancies AT songolovaekaterinan wholegenomenoninvasiveprenataltestinginprenatalscreeningalgorithmclinicalexperiencefrom12700pregnancies |