Cargando…

Rapid economical acetic acid Papanicolaou staining procedure versus conventional staining procedure in normal oral mucosa

BACKGROUND: Papanicolaou (Pap) staining technique is a conventional technique used in cytology but it is time consuming. AIM: The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy of Rapid Economical Acetic acid Papanicolaou stain (REAP) over conventional staining technique in studying normal oral muco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Panneerselvam, Karthika, Karthik, Raghavendhar K, Ramadoss, Ramya, Kumar, A. Ramesh, Rajkumar, K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35968181
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_135_20
_version_ 1784765184609353728
author Panneerselvam, Karthika
Karthik, Raghavendhar K
Ramadoss, Ramya
Kumar, A. Ramesh
Rajkumar, K.
author_facet Panneerselvam, Karthika
Karthik, Raghavendhar K
Ramadoss, Ramya
Kumar, A. Ramesh
Rajkumar, K.
author_sort Panneerselvam, Karthika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Papanicolaou (Pap) staining technique is a conventional technique used in cytology but it is time consuming. AIM: The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy of Rapid Economical Acetic acid Papanicolaou stain (REAP) over conventional staining technique in studying normal oral mucosa. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty patients were selected and were grouped based on their habits. Two smears were obtained from each patient and were subjected to both the staining techniques. A total of 160 slides were studied for features such as cellular outline, nuclear outline, nuclear details, cellular differentiation, micronuclei and cellular transparency. RESULTS: The conventional staining procedure showed 79 cases of optimal cellular staining, 78 cases of optimal nuclear staining, 35 cases of optimal nuclear details, 57 cases of optimal differentiation and 27 cases of optimal transparency and 33 cases of optimal micronuclei. REAP staining showed 75 cases of optimal cellular staining, 64 cases of optimal nuclear staining, 20 cases of optimal nuclear details, 36 cases of optimal differentiation and 28 cases of optimal transparency and 25 cases of optimal micronuclei. CONCLUSION: REAP staining effectively reduces the time and the cost factor, but the cytological details are well observed under conventional staining technique in normal patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9364633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93646332022-08-11 Rapid economical acetic acid Papanicolaou staining procedure versus conventional staining procedure in normal oral mucosa Panneerselvam, Karthika Karthik, Raghavendhar K Ramadoss, Ramya Kumar, A. Ramesh Rajkumar, K. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol Original Article BACKGROUND: Papanicolaou (Pap) staining technique is a conventional technique used in cytology but it is time consuming. AIM: The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy of Rapid Economical Acetic acid Papanicolaou stain (REAP) over conventional staining technique in studying normal oral mucosa. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty patients were selected and were grouped based on their habits. Two smears were obtained from each patient and were subjected to both the staining techniques. A total of 160 slides were studied for features such as cellular outline, nuclear outline, nuclear details, cellular differentiation, micronuclei and cellular transparency. RESULTS: The conventional staining procedure showed 79 cases of optimal cellular staining, 78 cases of optimal nuclear staining, 35 cases of optimal nuclear details, 57 cases of optimal differentiation and 27 cases of optimal transparency and 33 cases of optimal micronuclei. REAP staining showed 75 cases of optimal cellular staining, 64 cases of optimal nuclear staining, 20 cases of optimal nuclear details, 36 cases of optimal differentiation and 28 cases of optimal transparency and 25 cases of optimal micronuclei. CONCLUSION: REAP staining effectively reduces the time and the cost factor, but the cytological details are well observed under conventional staining technique in normal patients. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9364633/ /pubmed/35968181 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_135_20 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Panneerselvam, Karthika
Karthik, Raghavendhar K
Ramadoss, Ramya
Kumar, A. Ramesh
Rajkumar, K.
Rapid economical acetic acid Papanicolaou staining procedure versus conventional staining procedure in normal oral mucosa
title Rapid economical acetic acid Papanicolaou staining procedure versus conventional staining procedure in normal oral mucosa
title_full Rapid economical acetic acid Papanicolaou staining procedure versus conventional staining procedure in normal oral mucosa
title_fullStr Rapid economical acetic acid Papanicolaou staining procedure versus conventional staining procedure in normal oral mucosa
title_full_unstemmed Rapid economical acetic acid Papanicolaou staining procedure versus conventional staining procedure in normal oral mucosa
title_short Rapid economical acetic acid Papanicolaou staining procedure versus conventional staining procedure in normal oral mucosa
title_sort rapid economical acetic acid papanicolaou staining procedure versus conventional staining procedure in normal oral mucosa
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35968181
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_135_20
work_keys_str_mv AT panneerselvamkarthika rapideconomicalaceticacidpapanicolaoustainingprocedureversusconventionalstainingprocedureinnormaloralmucosa
AT karthikraghavendhark rapideconomicalaceticacidpapanicolaoustainingprocedureversusconventionalstainingprocedureinnormaloralmucosa
AT ramadossramya rapideconomicalaceticacidpapanicolaoustainingprocedureversusconventionalstainingprocedureinnormaloralmucosa
AT kumararamesh rapideconomicalaceticacidpapanicolaoustainingprocedureversusconventionalstainingprocedureinnormaloralmucosa
AT rajkumark rapideconomicalaceticacidpapanicolaoustainingprocedureversusconventionalstainingprocedureinnormaloralmucosa