Cargando…
Rapid economical acetic acid Papanicolaou staining procedure versus conventional staining procedure in normal oral mucosa
BACKGROUND: Papanicolaou (Pap) staining technique is a conventional technique used in cytology but it is time consuming. AIM: The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy of Rapid Economical Acetic acid Papanicolaou stain (REAP) over conventional staining technique in studying normal oral muco...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35968181 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_135_20 |
_version_ | 1784765184609353728 |
---|---|
author | Panneerselvam, Karthika Karthik, Raghavendhar K Ramadoss, Ramya Kumar, A. Ramesh Rajkumar, K. |
author_facet | Panneerselvam, Karthika Karthik, Raghavendhar K Ramadoss, Ramya Kumar, A. Ramesh Rajkumar, K. |
author_sort | Panneerselvam, Karthika |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Papanicolaou (Pap) staining technique is a conventional technique used in cytology but it is time consuming. AIM: The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy of Rapid Economical Acetic acid Papanicolaou stain (REAP) over conventional staining technique in studying normal oral mucosa. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty patients were selected and were grouped based on their habits. Two smears were obtained from each patient and were subjected to both the staining techniques. A total of 160 slides were studied for features such as cellular outline, nuclear outline, nuclear details, cellular differentiation, micronuclei and cellular transparency. RESULTS: The conventional staining procedure showed 79 cases of optimal cellular staining, 78 cases of optimal nuclear staining, 35 cases of optimal nuclear details, 57 cases of optimal differentiation and 27 cases of optimal transparency and 33 cases of optimal micronuclei. REAP staining showed 75 cases of optimal cellular staining, 64 cases of optimal nuclear staining, 20 cases of optimal nuclear details, 36 cases of optimal differentiation and 28 cases of optimal transparency and 25 cases of optimal micronuclei. CONCLUSION: REAP staining effectively reduces the time and the cost factor, but the cytological details are well observed under conventional staining technique in normal patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9364633 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93646332022-08-11 Rapid economical acetic acid Papanicolaou staining procedure versus conventional staining procedure in normal oral mucosa Panneerselvam, Karthika Karthik, Raghavendhar K Ramadoss, Ramya Kumar, A. Ramesh Rajkumar, K. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol Original Article BACKGROUND: Papanicolaou (Pap) staining technique is a conventional technique used in cytology but it is time consuming. AIM: The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy of Rapid Economical Acetic acid Papanicolaou stain (REAP) over conventional staining technique in studying normal oral mucosa. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty patients were selected and were grouped based on their habits. Two smears were obtained from each patient and were subjected to both the staining techniques. A total of 160 slides were studied for features such as cellular outline, nuclear outline, nuclear details, cellular differentiation, micronuclei and cellular transparency. RESULTS: The conventional staining procedure showed 79 cases of optimal cellular staining, 78 cases of optimal nuclear staining, 35 cases of optimal nuclear details, 57 cases of optimal differentiation and 27 cases of optimal transparency and 33 cases of optimal micronuclei. REAP staining showed 75 cases of optimal cellular staining, 64 cases of optimal nuclear staining, 20 cases of optimal nuclear details, 36 cases of optimal differentiation and 28 cases of optimal transparency and 25 cases of optimal micronuclei. CONCLUSION: REAP staining effectively reduces the time and the cost factor, but the cytological details are well observed under conventional staining technique in normal patients. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9364633/ /pubmed/35968181 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_135_20 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Panneerselvam, Karthika Karthik, Raghavendhar K Ramadoss, Ramya Kumar, A. Ramesh Rajkumar, K. Rapid economical acetic acid Papanicolaou staining procedure versus conventional staining procedure in normal oral mucosa |
title | Rapid economical acetic acid Papanicolaou staining procedure versus conventional staining procedure in normal oral mucosa |
title_full | Rapid economical acetic acid Papanicolaou staining procedure versus conventional staining procedure in normal oral mucosa |
title_fullStr | Rapid economical acetic acid Papanicolaou staining procedure versus conventional staining procedure in normal oral mucosa |
title_full_unstemmed | Rapid economical acetic acid Papanicolaou staining procedure versus conventional staining procedure in normal oral mucosa |
title_short | Rapid economical acetic acid Papanicolaou staining procedure versus conventional staining procedure in normal oral mucosa |
title_sort | rapid economical acetic acid papanicolaou staining procedure versus conventional staining procedure in normal oral mucosa |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35968181 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_135_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT panneerselvamkarthika rapideconomicalaceticacidpapanicolaoustainingprocedureversusconventionalstainingprocedureinnormaloralmucosa AT karthikraghavendhark rapideconomicalaceticacidpapanicolaoustainingprocedureversusconventionalstainingprocedureinnormaloralmucosa AT ramadossramya rapideconomicalaceticacidpapanicolaoustainingprocedureversusconventionalstainingprocedureinnormaloralmucosa AT kumararamesh rapideconomicalaceticacidpapanicolaoustainingprocedureversusconventionalstainingprocedureinnormaloralmucosa AT rajkumark rapideconomicalaceticacidpapanicolaoustainingprocedureversusconventionalstainingprocedureinnormaloralmucosa |