Cargando…
Benchmarking ultra-high molecular weight DNA preservation methods for long-read and long-range sequencing
BACKGROUND: Studies in vertebrate genomics require sampling from a broad range of tissue types, taxa, and localities. Recent advancements in long-read and long-range genome sequencing have made it possible to produce high-quality chromosome-level genome assemblies for almost any organism. However, a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35946988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giac068 |
_version_ | 1784765196425756672 |
---|---|
author | Dahn, Hollis A Mountcastle, Jacquelyn Balacco, Jennifer Winkler, Sylke Bista, Iliana Schmitt, Anthony D Pettersson, Olga Vinnere Formenti, Giulio Oliver, Karen Smith, Michelle Tan, Wenhua Kraus, Anne Mac, Stephen Komoroske, Lisa M Lama, Tanya Crawford, Andrew J Murphy, Robert W Brown, Samara Scott, Alan F Morin, Phillip A Jarvis, Erich D Fedrigo, Olivier |
author_facet | Dahn, Hollis A Mountcastle, Jacquelyn Balacco, Jennifer Winkler, Sylke Bista, Iliana Schmitt, Anthony D Pettersson, Olga Vinnere Formenti, Giulio Oliver, Karen Smith, Michelle Tan, Wenhua Kraus, Anne Mac, Stephen Komoroske, Lisa M Lama, Tanya Crawford, Andrew J Murphy, Robert W Brown, Samara Scott, Alan F Morin, Phillip A Jarvis, Erich D Fedrigo, Olivier |
author_sort | Dahn, Hollis A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Studies in vertebrate genomics require sampling from a broad range of tissue types, taxa, and localities. Recent advancements in long-read and long-range genome sequencing have made it possible to produce high-quality chromosome-level genome assemblies for almost any organism. However, adequate tissue preservation for the requisite ultra-high molecular weight DNA (uHMW DNA) remains a major challenge. Here we present a comparative study of preservation methods for field and laboratory tissue sampling, across vertebrate classes and different tissue types. RESULTS: We find that storage temperature was the strongest predictor of uHMW fragment lengths. While immediate flash-freezing remains the sample preservation gold standard, samples preserved in 95% EtOH or 20–25% DMSO-EDTA showed little fragment length degradation when stored at 4°C for 6 hours. Samples in 95% EtOH or 20–25% DMSO-EDTA kept at 4°C for 1 week after dissection still yielded adequate amounts of uHMW DNA for most applications. Tissue type was a significant predictor of total DNA yield but not fragment length. Preservation solution had a smaller but significant influence on both fragment length and DNA yield. CONCLUSION: We provide sample preservation guidelines that ensure sufficient DNA integrity and amount required for use with long-read and long-range sequencing technologies across vertebrates. Our best practices generated the uHMW DNA needed for the high-quality reference genomes for phase 1 of the Vertebrate Genomes Project, whose ultimate mission is to generate chromosome-level reference genome assemblies of all ∼70,000 extant vertebrate species. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9364683 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93646832022-08-11 Benchmarking ultra-high molecular weight DNA preservation methods for long-read and long-range sequencing Dahn, Hollis A Mountcastle, Jacquelyn Balacco, Jennifer Winkler, Sylke Bista, Iliana Schmitt, Anthony D Pettersson, Olga Vinnere Formenti, Giulio Oliver, Karen Smith, Michelle Tan, Wenhua Kraus, Anne Mac, Stephen Komoroske, Lisa M Lama, Tanya Crawford, Andrew J Murphy, Robert W Brown, Samara Scott, Alan F Morin, Phillip A Jarvis, Erich D Fedrigo, Olivier Gigascience Research BACKGROUND: Studies in vertebrate genomics require sampling from a broad range of tissue types, taxa, and localities. Recent advancements in long-read and long-range genome sequencing have made it possible to produce high-quality chromosome-level genome assemblies for almost any organism. However, adequate tissue preservation for the requisite ultra-high molecular weight DNA (uHMW DNA) remains a major challenge. Here we present a comparative study of preservation methods for field and laboratory tissue sampling, across vertebrate classes and different tissue types. RESULTS: We find that storage temperature was the strongest predictor of uHMW fragment lengths. While immediate flash-freezing remains the sample preservation gold standard, samples preserved in 95% EtOH or 20–25% DMSO-EDTA showed little fragment length degradation when stored at 4°C for 6 hours. Samples in 95% EtOH or 20–25% DMSO-EDTA kept at 4°C for 1 week after dissection still yielded adequate amounts of uHMW DNA for most applications. Tissue type was a significant predictor of total DNA yield but not fragment length. Preservation solution had a smaller but significant influence on both fragment length and DNA yield. CONCLUSION: We provide sample preservation guidelines that ensure sufficient DNA integrity and amount required for use with long-read and long-range sequencing technologies across vertebrates. Our best practices generated the uHMW DNA needed for the high-quality reference genomes for phase 1 of the Vertebrate Genomes Project, whose ultimate mission is to generate chromosome-level reference genome assemblies of all ∼70,000 extant vertebrate species. Oxford University Press 2022-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9364683/ /pubmed/35946988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giac068 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press GigaScience. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Dahn, Hollis A Mountcastle, Jacquelyn Balacco, Jennifer Winkler, Sylke Bista, Iliana Schmitt, Anthony D Pettersson, Olga Vinnere Formenti, Giulio Oliver, Karen Smith, Michelle Tan, Wenhua Kraus, Anne Mac, Stephen Komoroske, Lisa M Lama, Tanya Crawford, Andrew J Murphy, Robert W Brown, Samara Scott, Alan F Morin, Phillip A Jarvis, Erich D Fedrigo, Olivier Benchmarking ultra-high molecular weight DNA preservation methods for long-read and long-range sequencing |
title | Benchmarking ultra-high molecular weight DNA preservation methods for long-read and long-range sequencing |
title_full | Benchmarking ultra-high molecular weight DNA preservation methods for long-read and long-range sequencing |
title_fullStr | Benchmarking ultra-high molecular weight DNA preservation methods for long-read and long-range sequencing |
title_full_unstemmed | Benchmarking ultra-high molecular weight DNA preservation methods for long-read and long-range sequencing |
title_short | Benchmarking ultra-high molecular weight DNA preservation methods for long-read and long-range sequencing |
title_sort | benchmarking ultra-high molecular weight dna preservation methods for long-read and long-range sequencing |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35946988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giac068 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dahnhollisa benchmarkingultrahighmolecularweightdnapreservationmethodsforlongreadandlongrangesequencing AT mountcastlejacquelyn benchmarkingultrahighmolecularweightdnapreservationmethodsforlongreadandlongrangesequencing AT balaccojennifer benchmarkingultrahighmolecularweightdnapreservationmethodsforlongreadandlongrangesequencing AT winklersylke benchmarkingultrahighmolecularweightdnapreservationmethodsforlongreadandlongrangesequencing AT bistailiana benchmarkingultrahighmolecularweightdnapreservationmethodsforlongreadandlongrangesequencing AT schmittanthonyd benchmarkingultrahighmolecularweightdnapreservationmethodsforlongreadandlongrangesequencing AT petterssonolgavinnere benchmarkingultrahighmolecularweightdnapreservationmethodsforlongreadandlongrangesequencing AT formentigiulio benchmarkingultrahighmolecularweightdnapreservationmethodsforlongreadandlongrangesequencing AT oliverkaren benchmarkingultrahighmolecularweightdnapreservationmethodsforlongreadandlongrangesequencing AT smithmichelle benchmarkingultrahighmolecularweightdnapreservationmethodsforlongreadandlongrangesequencing AT tanwenhua benchmarkingultrahighmolecularweightdnapreservationmethodsforlongreadandlongrangesequencing AT krausanne benchmarkingultrahighmolecularweightdnapreservationmethodsforlongreadandlongrangesequencing AT macstephen benchmarkingultrahighmolecularweightdnapreservationmethodsforlongreadandlongrangesequencing AT komoroskelisam benchmarkingultrahighmolecularweightdnapreservationmethodsforlongreadandlongrangesequencing AT lamatanya benchmarkingultrahighmolecularweightdnapreservationmethodsforlongreadandlongrangesequencing AT crawfordandrewj benchmarkingultrahighmolecularweightdnapreservationmethodsforlongreadandlongrangesequencing AT murphyrobertw benchmarkingultrahighmolecularweightdnapreservationmethodsforlongreadandlongrangesequencing AT brownsamara benchmarkingultrahighmolecularweightdnapreservationmethodsforlongreadandlongrangesequencing AT scottalanf benchmarkingultrahighmolecularweightdnapreservationmethodsforlongreadandlongrangesequencing AT morinphillipa benchmarkingultrahighmolecularweightdnapreservationmethodsforlongreadandlongrangesequencing AT jarviserichd benchmarkingultrahighmolecularweightdnapreservationmethodsforlongreadandlongrangesequencing AT fedrigoolivier benchmarkingultrahighmolecularweightdnapreservationmethodsforlongreadandlongrangesequencing |