Cargando…

A Review of Imaging Methods to Assess Ultrasound-Mediated Ablation

Ultrasound ablation techniques are minimally invasive alternatives to surgical resection and have rapidly increased in use. The response of tissue to HIFU ablation differs based on the relative contributions of thermal and mechanical effects, which can be varied to achieve optimal ablation parameter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fite, Brett Z., Wang, James, Ghanouni, Pejman, Ferrara, Katherine W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AAAS 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35957844
http://dx.doi.org/10.34133/2022/9758652
_version_ 1784765217724432384
author Fite, Brett Z.
Wang, James
Ghanouni, Pejman
Ferrara, Katherine W.
author_facet Fite, Brett Z.
Wang, James
Ghanouni, Pejman
Ferrara, Katherine W.
author_sort Fite, Brett Z.
collection PubMed
description Ultrasound ablation techniques are minimally invasive alternatives to surgical resection and have rapidly increased in use. The response of tissue to HIFU ablation differs based on the relative contributions of thermal and mechanical effects, which can be varied to achieve optimal ablation parameters for a given tissue type and location. In tumor ablation, similar to surgical resection, it is desirable to include a safety margin of ablated tissue around the entirety of the tumor. A factor in optimizing ablative techniques is minimizing the recurrence rate, which can be due to incomplete ablation of the target tissue. Further, combining focal ablation with immunotherapy is likely to be key for effective treatment of metastatic cancer, and therefore characterizing the impact of ablation on the tumor microenvironment will be important. Thus, visualization and quantification of the extent of ablation is an integral component of ablative procedures. The aim of this review article is to describe the radiological findings after ultrasound ablation across multiple imaging modalities. This review presents readers with a general overview of the current and emerging imaging methods to assess the efficacy of ultrasound ablative treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9364780
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AAAS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93647802022-08-10 A Review of Imaging Methods to Assess Ultrasound-Mediated Ablation Fite, Brett Z. Wang, James Ghanouni, Pejman Ferrara, Katherine W. BME Front Review Article Ultrasound ablation techniques are minimally invasive alternatives to surgical resection and have rapidly increased in use. The response of tissue to HIFU ablation differs based on the relative contributions of thermal and mechanical effects, which can be varied to achieve optimal ablation parameters for a given tissue type and location. In tumor ablation, similar to surgical resection, it is desirable to include a safety margin of ablated tissue around the entirety of the tumor. A factor in optimizing ablative techniques is minimizing the recurrence rate, which can be due to incomplete ablation of the target tissue. Further, combining focal ablation with immunotherapy is likely to be key for effective treatment of metastatic cancer, and therefore characterizing the impact of ablation on the tumor microenvironment will be important. Thus, visualization and quantification of the extent of ablation is an integral component of ablative procedures. The aim of this review article is to describe the radiological findings after ultrasound ablation across multiple imaging modalities. This review presents readers with a general overview of the current and emerging imaging methods to assess the efficacy of ultrasound ablative treatments. AAAS 2022-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9364780/ /pubmed/35957844 http://dx.doi.org/10.34133/2022/9758652 Text en Copyright © 2022 Brett Z. Fite et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Exclusive Licensee Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, CAS. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Review Article
Fite, Brett Z.
Wang, James
Ghanouni, Pejman
Ferrara, Katherine W.
A Review of Imaging Methods to Assess Ultrasound-Mediated Ablation
title A Review of Imaging Methods to Assess Ultrasound-Mediated Ablation
title_full A Review of Imaging Methods to Assess Ultrasound-Mediated Ablation
title_fullStr A Review of Imaging Methods to Assess Ultrasound-Mediated Ablation
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Imaging Methods to Assess Ultrasound-Mediated Ablation
title_short A Review of Imaging Methods to Assess Ultrasound-Mediated Ablation
title_sort review of imaging methods to assess ultrasound-mediated ablation
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35957844
http://dx.doi.org/10.34133/2022/9758652
work_keys_str_mv AT fitebrettz areviewofimagingmethodstoassessultrasoundmediatedablation
AT wangjames areviewofimagingmethodstoassessultrasoundmediatedablation
AT ghanounipejman areviewofimagingmethodstoassessultrasoundmediatedablation
AT ferrarakatherinew areviewofimagingmethodstoassessultrasoundmediatedablation
AT fitebrettz reviewofimagingmethodstoassessultrasoundmediatedablation
AT wangjames reviewofimagingmethodstoassessultrasoundmediatedablation
AT ghanounipejman reviewofimagingmethodstoassessultrasoundmediatedablation
AT ferrarakatherinew reviewofimagingmethodstoassessultrasoundmediatedablation