Cargando…
Self-monitoring of blood pressure in pregnancy: A mixed methods evaluation of a national roll-out in the context of a pandemic
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how English maternity units implemented self-monitoring of blood pressure (SMBP) in pregnancy in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Mixed methods including surveys, anonymised patient data and in-depth interviews with women. SETTING: Maternity units across England. PAR...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364829/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35933759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.07.006 |
_version_ | 1784765226181197824 |
---|---|
author | Wilson, Hannah Tucker, Katherine L. Chisholm, Alison Hodgkinson, James Lavallee, Layla Mackillop, Lucy Cairns, Alexandra E. Hinton, Lisa Podschies, Charlie Chappell, Lucy C. McManus, Richard J. |
author_facet | Wilson, Hannah Tucker, Katherine L. Chisholm, Alison Hodgkinson, James Lavallee, Layla Mackillop, Lucy Cairns, Alexandra E. Hinton, Lisa Podschies, Charlie Chappell, Lucy C. McManus, Richard J. |
author_sort | Wilson, Hannah |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how English maternity units implemented self-monitoring of blood pressure (SMBP) in pregnancy in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Mixed methods including surveys, anonymised patient data and in-depth interviews with women. SETTING: Maternity units across England. PARTICIPANTS: 45 maternity units completed a survey about the implementation of SMBP (supported by the provision of guidance and blood pressure monitors) during the pandemic, 166 women completed a survey about their experiences of SMBP, and 23 women took part in in-depth interviews. Clinical data from 627 women undertaking SMBP were available from 13 maternity units. RESULTS: SMBP was predominantly used to provide additional BP monitoring for hypertensive or high-risk pregnant women. Overall maternity units and women were positive about its use in terms of reducing the need for additional face-to-face contacts and giving women more control and insight into their own BP. However, there were challenges in setting up SMBP services rapidly and embedding them within existing care pathways, particularly around interpreting readings and managing the provision of monitors. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable proportion of maternity units in England commenced a SMBP service for hypertensive or high-risk women from March 2020. There is a need for further research into appropriate care pathways, including guidance around white coat or masked hypertension and the use of SMBP postnatally. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9364829 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93648292022-08-10 Self-monitoring of blood pressure in pregnancy: A mixed methods evaluation of a national roll-out in the context of a pandemic Wilson, Hannah Tucker, Katherine L. Chisholm, Alison Hodgkinson, James Lavallee, Layla Mackillop, Lucy Cairns, Alexandra E. Hinton, Lisa Podschies, Charlie Chappell, Lucy C. McManus, Richard J. Pregnancy Hypertens Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how English maternity units implemented self-monitoring of blood pressure (SMBP) in pregnancy in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Mixed methods including surveys, anonymised patient data and in-depth interviews with women. SETTING: Maternity units across England. PARTICIPANTS: 45 maternity units completed a survey about the implementation of SMBP (supported by the provision of guidance and blood pressure monitors) during the pandemic, 166 women completed a survey about their experiences of SMBP, and 23 women took part in in-depth interviews. Clinical data from 627 women undertaking SMBP were available from 13 maternity units. RESULTS: SMBP was predominantly used to provide additional BP monitoring for hypertensive or high-risk pregnant women. Overall maternity units and women were positive about its use in terms of reducing the need for additional face-to-face contacts and giving women more control and insight into their own BP. However, there were challenges in setting up SMBP services rapidly and embedding them within existing care pathways, particularly around interpreting readings and managing the provision of monitors. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable proportion of maternity units in England commenced a SMBP service for hypertensive or high-risk women from March 2020. There is a need for further research into appropriate care pathways, including guidance around white coat or masked hypertension and the use of SMBP postnatally. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy. 2022-12 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9364829/ /pubmed/35933759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.07.006 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Wilson, Hannah Tucker, Katherine L. Chisholm, Alison Hodgkinson, James Lavallee, Layla Mackillop, Lucy Cairns, Alexandra E. Hinton, Lisa Podschies, Charlie Chappell, Lucy C. McManus, Richard J. Self-monitoring of blood pressure in pregnancy: A mixed methods evaluation of a national roll-out in the context of a pandemic |
title | Self-monitoring of blood pressure in pregnancy: A mixed methods evaluation of a national roll-out in the context of a pandemic |
title_full | Self-monitoring of blood pressure in pregnancy: A mixed methods evaluation of a national roll-out in the context of a pandemic |
title_fullStr | Self-monitoring of blood pressure in pregnancy: A mixed methods evaluation of a national roll-out in the context of a pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | Self-monitoring of blood pressure in pregnancy: A mixed methods evaluation of a national roll-out in the context of a pandemic |
title_short | Self-monitoring of blood pressure in pregnancy: A mixed methods evaluation of a national roll-out in the context of a pandemic |
title_sort | self-monitoring of blood pressure in pregnancy: a mixed methods evaluation of a national roll-out in the context of a pandemic |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364829/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35933759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.07.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wilsonhannah selfmonitoringofbloodpressureinpregnancyamixedmethodsevaluationofanationalrolloutinthecontextofapandemic AT tuckerkatherinel selfmonitoringofbloodpressureinpregnancyamixedmethodsevaluationofanationalrolloutinthecontextofapandemic AT chisholmalison selfmonitoringofbloodpressureinpregnancyamixedmethodsevaluationofanationalrolloutinthecontextofapandemic AT hodgkinsonjames selfmonitoringofbloodpressureinpregnancyamixedmethodsevaluationofanationalrolloutinthecontextofapandemic AT lavalleelayla selfmonitoringofbloodpressureinpregnancyamixedmethodsevaluationofanationalrolloutinthecontextofapandemic AT mackilloplucy selfmonitoringofbloodpressureinpregnancyamixedmethodsevaluationofanationalrolloutinthecontextofapandemic AT cairnsalexandrae selfmonitoringofbloodpressureinpregnancyamixedmethodsevaluationofanationalrolloutinthecontextofapandemic AT hintonlisa selfmonitoringofbloodpressureinpregnancyamixedmethodsevaluationofanationalrolloutinthecontextofapandemic AT podschiescharlie selfmonitoringofbloodpressureinpregnancyamixedmethodsevaluationofanationalrolloutinthecontextofapandemic AT chappelllucyc selfmonitoringofbloodpressureinpregnancyamixedmethodsevaluationofanationalrolloutinthecontextofapandemic AT mcmanusrichardj selfmonitoringofbloodpressureinpregnancyamixedmethodsevaluationofanationalrolloutinthecontextofapandemic |